Emanuela Pizzolla, Mirta Fiorio, Angela Marotta, Elisa Raffaella Ferrè, Matthew Longo
{"title":"EXPRESS:精神疲劳对感知手重无影响。","authors":"Emanuela Pizzolla, Mirta Fiorio, Angela Marotta, Elisa Raffaella Ferrè, Matthew Longo","doi":"10.1177/17470218251361426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fatigue has a profound impact on various sensory and perceptual processes, yet its effects differ depending on whether it arises from physical or mental exertion. While physical fatigue is known to alter body weight perception, it remains unclear whether mental fatigue has a similar effect. This study tested the hypothesis that mental fatigue, like physical fatigue, would influence the recently identified perceptual bias of hand weight underestimation, where individuals perceive their hand as lighter than its actual weight. Twenty-four participants completed a validated mental fatigue induction task, followed by pre- and post-fatigue assessments of hand weight perception using a weight judgment paradigm. As expected, the fatigue task significantly increased subjective ratings of mental fatigue. However, contrary to the hypothesis, the degree of hand weight underestimation remained unchanged between pre- and post-fatigue sessions, a Bayesian analysis strongly supported the null hypothesis. These results suggest that mental fatigue, unlike physical fatigue, does not significantly alter sensory mechanisms underlying hand weight perception. This study underscores the distinct pathways through which physical and mental fatigue interact with perceptual processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251361426"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPRESS: No effect of mental fatigue on perceived hand weight.\",\"authors\":\"Emanuela Pizzolla, Mirta Fiorio, Angela Marotta, Elisa Raffaella Ferrè, Matthew Longo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17470218251361426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Fatigue has a profound impact on various sensory and perceptual processes, yet its effects differ depending on whether it arises from physical or mental exertion. While physical fatigue is known to alter body weight perception, it remains unclear whether mental fatigue has a similar effect. This study tested the hypothesis that mental fatigue, like physical fatigue, would influence the recently identified perceptual bias of hand weight underestimation, where individuals perceive their hand as lighter than its actual weight. Twenty-four participants completed a validated mental fatigue induction task, followed by pre- and post-fatigue assessments of hand weight perception using a weight judgment paradigm. As expected, the fatigue task significantly increased subjective ratings of mental fatigue. However, contrary to the hypothesis, the degree of hand weight underestimation remained unchanged between pre- and post-fatigue sessions, a Bayesian analysis strongly supported the null hypothesis. These results suggest that mental fatigue, unlike physical fatigue, does not significantly alter sensory mechanisms underlying hand weight perception. This study underscores the distinct pathways through which physical and mental fatigue interact with perceptual processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17470218251361426\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251361426\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251361426","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
EXPRESS: No effect of mental fatigue on perceived hand weight.
Fatigue has a profound impact on various sensory and perceptual processes, yet its effects differ depending on whether it arises from physical or mental exertion. While physical fatigue is known to alter body weight perception, it remains unclear whether mental fatigue has a similar effect. This study tested the hypothesis that mental fatigue, like physical fatigue, would influence the recently identified perceptual bias of hand weight underestimation, where individuals perceive their hand as lighter than its actual weight. Twenty-four participants completed a validated mental fatigue induction task, followed by pre- and post-fatigue assessments of hand weight perception using a weight judgment paradigm. As expected, the fatigue task significantly increased subjective ratings of mental fatigue. However, contrary to the hypothesis, the degree of hand weight underestimation remained unchanged between pre- and post-fatigue sessions, a Bayesian analysis strongly supported the null hypothesis. These results suggest that mental fatigue, unlike physical fatigue, does not significantly alter sensory mechanisms underlying hand weight perception. This study underscores the distinct pathways through which physical and mental fatigue interact with perceptual processes.
期刊介绍:
Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling.
QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form.
The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.