儿科流行病学的因果推断和调查数据:从观察数据中归纳治疗效果。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Lizbeth Burgos-Ochoa, Felix J Clouth
{"title":"儿科流行病学的因果推断和调查数据:从观察数据中归纳治疗效果。","authors":"Lizbeth Burgos-Ochoa, Felix J Clouth","doi":"10.1111/ppe.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Survey data are essential in paediatric epidemiology, providing valuable insights into child health outcomes. The potential outcomes framework has advanced causal inference using observational data. However, traditional design-based adjustments, especially sample weights, are often overlooked. This omission limits the ability to generalise findings to the broader population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study demonstrates three approaches for estimating the population average treatment effect (PATE) in a practical example, examining the impact of household second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure on blood pressure in school-aged children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2020, we assessed the effect of household SHS exposure, a non-randomised treatment, on blood pressure in school-aged children. We applied estimators based on Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW), G-computation, Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (TMLE), and regression adjustment. Models without adjustments were run for comparison. We examined point estimates and the efficiency of the estimates obtained from these methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The largest differences were observed between the unadjusted regression models and the fully adjusted methods (IPTW, G-computation, and TMLE), which account for both confounding and survey weights. While the inclusion of the sample weights leads to wider confidence intervals for all methods, G-computation and TMLE showed comparatively narrower confidence intervals. Confidence intervals for the models not adjusted for sample weights were likely underestimated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the important role of sample weights in causal inference. Generalisability of the average treatment effect as estimated on data sampled using common survey designs to a defined population requires the use of sample weights. The estimators described provide a framework for incorporating sample weights, and their use in health research is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":19698,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal Inference and Survey Data in Paediatric Epidemiology: Generalising Treatment Effects From Observational Data.\",\"authors\":\"Lizbeth Burgos-Ochoa, Felix J Clouth\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ppe.70042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Survey data are essential in paediatric epidemiology, providing valuable insights into child health outcomes. The potential outcomes framework has advanced causal inference using observational data. However, traditional design-based adjustments, especially sample weights, are often overlooked. This omission limits the ability to generalise findings to the broader population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study demonstrates three approaches for estimating the population average treatment effect (PATE) in a practical example, examining the impact of household second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure on blood pressure in school-aged children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2020, we assessed the effect of household SHS exposure, a non-randomised treatment, on blood pressure in school-aged children. We applied estimators based on Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW), G-computation, Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (TMLE), and regression adjustment. Models without adjustments were run for comparison. We examined point estimates and the efficiency of the estimates obtained from these methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The largest differences were observed between the unadjusted regression models and the fully adjusted methods (IPTW, G-computation, and TMLE), which account for both confounding and survey weights. While the inclusion of the sample weights leads to wider confidence intervals for all methods, G-computation and TMLE showed comparatively narrower confidence intervals. Confidence intervals for the models not adjusted for sample weights were likely underestimated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the important role of sample weights in causal inference. Generalisability of the average treatment effect as estimated on data sampled using common survey designs to a defined population requires the use of sample weights. The estimators described provide a framework for incorporating sample weights, and their use in health research is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.70042\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.70042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:调查数据在儿科流行病学中是必不可少的,为儿童健康结果提供了宝贵的见解。潜在结果框架利用观测数据进行了高级因果推理。然而,传统的基于设计的调整,特别是样本权重,经常被忽视。这种遗漏限制了将研究结果推广到更广泛人群的能力。目的:本研究通过一个实例,展示了三种估算人群平均治疗效果(PATE)的方法,研究了家庭二手烟(SHS)暴露对学龄儿童血压的影响。方法:使用2017-2020年国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的数据,我们评估了家庭SHS暴露(一种非随机治疗)对学龄儿童血压的影响。我们应用了基于处理加权逆概率(IPTW)、g计算、目标最大似然估计(TMLE)和回归调整的估计器。没有进行调整的模型进行比较。我们检验了从这些方法得到的点估计和估计的效率。结果:未调整的回归模型与完全调整的回归模型(IPTW、G-computation和TMLE)之间的差异最大,这既考虑了混杂因素,也考虑了调查权重。虽然纳入样本权重导致所有方法的置信区间较宽,但g计算和TMLE的置信区间相对较窄。未根据样本权重调整的模型的置信区间可能被低估了。结论:本研究突出了样本权重在因果推理中的重要作用。根据使用普通调查设计的抽样数据估计的平均处理效果的概括性需要使用样本权重。所描述的估计值为纳入样本权重提供了一个框架,建议在卫生研究中使用这些估计值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Causal Inference and Survey Data in Paediatric Epidemiology: Generalising Treatment Effects From Observational Data.

Background: Survey data are essential in paediatric epidemiology, providing valuable insights into child health outcomes. The potential outcomes framework has advanced causal inference using observational data. However, traditional design-based adjustments, especially sample weights, are often overlooked. This omission limits the ability to generalise findings to the broader population.

Objective: This study demonstrates three approaches for estimating the population average treatment effect (PATE) in a practical example, examining the impact of household second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure on blood pressure in school-aged children.

Methods: Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2020, we assessed the effect of household SHS exposure, a non-randomised treatment, on blood pressure in school-aged children. We applied estimators based on Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW), G-computation, Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (TMLE), and regression adjustment. Models without adjustments were run for comparison. We examined point estimates and the efficiency of the estimates obtained from these methods.

Results: The largest differences were observed between the unadjusted regression models and the fully adjusted methods (IPTW, G-computation, and TMLE), which account for both confounding and survey weights. While the inclusion of the sample weights leads to wider confidence intervals for all methods, G-computation and TMLE showed comparatively narrower confidence intervals. Confidence intervals for the models not adjusted for sample weights were likely underestimated.

Conclusions: This study highlights the important role of sample weights in causal inference. Generalisability of the average treatment effect as estimated on data sampled using common survey designs to a defined population requires the use of sample weights. The estimators described provide a framework for incorporating sample weights, and their use in health research is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
84
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology crosses the boundaries between the epidemiologist and the paediatrician, obstetrician or specialist in child health, ensuring that important paediatric and perinatal studies reach those clinicians for whom the results are especially relevant. In addition to original research articles, the Journal also includes commentaries, book reviews and annotations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信