Huicong Liu, Hui Li, Lisha Xiao, Yubiao Guo, Gengpeng Lin
{"title":"Super-ARMS检测晚期非小细胞肺癌EGFR突变的生物标志物及预后价值","authors":"Huicong Liu, Hui Li, Lisha Xiao, Yubiao Guo, Gengpeng Lin","doi":"10.2147/OTT.S518837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>ctDNA is a non-invasive and convenient method for detecting EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its sensitivity is lower than that of tissue-based testing. To enhance ctDNA detection efficiency, we identified the patient population most suitable for ctDNA testing, assessed the relationship between ctDNA and tumor markers, and examined the clinical significance of ctDNA in medical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective study was conducted, including 135 patients with NSCLC who underwent histological and liquid Super-ARMS tests. Of these, 92 patients with EGFR mutations detected in both tumor tissue and plasma were classified into the EGFR<sup>t+, p+</sup> group, while 43 patients with EGFR mutations detected only in tumor tissue were classified into the EGFR<sup>t+, p-</sup> group. The clinical features and outcomes between these two groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The positivity rate of Super-ARMS test was 68.1% (92/135). The presence of EGFR<sup>t+, p+</sup> in the Super-ARMS test was significantly associated with pleural effusion, bone, liver, and multiple organ metastases. Compared to the EGFR<sup>t+, p+</sup> group, the EGFR<sup>t+, p-</sup> group had a significantly better PFS (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels demonstrated a strong predictive value for identifying plasma EGFR-mutated patients (AUC 0.828, sensitivity 68.8%, specificity 84.4%), while Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUV<sub>max</sub>) also showed diagnostic value for plasma EGFR-mutated patients (AUC 0.78). Additionally, combination of TP53 and EGFR mutations in plasma provided improved risk stratification for PFS (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients exhibiting metastasis, elevated levels of tumor markers and SUV<sub>max</sub> are more suitable for plasma EGFR mutation testing in clinical NSCLC management. Moreover, a positive plasma ctDNA test not only guides targeted therapy but also predicts a worse prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19534,"journal":{"name":"OncoTargets and therapy","volume":"18 ","pages":"789-801"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12255349/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomarker and Prognostic Value of Super-ARMS Detection for EGFR Mutation in Advanced NSCLC.\",\"authors\":\"Huicong Liu, Hui Li, Lisha Xiao, Yubiao Guo, Gengpeng Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OTT.S518837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>ctDNA is a non-invasive and convenient method for detecting EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its sensitivity is lower than that of tissue-based testing. To enhance ctDNA detection efficiency, we identified the patient population most suitable for ctDNA testing, assessed the relationship between ctDNA and tumor markers, and examined the clinical significance of ctDNA in medical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective study was conducted, including 135 patients with NSCLC who underwent histological and liquid Super-ARMS tests. Of these, 92 patients with EGFR mutations detected in both tumor tissue and plasma were classified into the EGFR<sup>t+, p+</sup> group, while 43 patients with EGFR mutations detected only in tumor tissue were classified into the EGFR<sup>t+, p-</sup> group. The clinical features and outcomes between these two groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The positivity rate of Super-ARMS test was 68.1% (92/135). The presence of EGFR<sup>t+, p+</sup> in the Super-ARMS test was significantly associated with pleural effusion, bone, liver, and multiple organ metastases. Compared to the EGFR<sup>t+, p+</sup> group, the EGFR<sup>t+, p-</sup> group had a significantly better PFS (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels demonstrated a strong predictive value for identifying plasma EGFR-mutated patients (AUC 0.828, sensitivity 68.8%, specificity 84.4%), while Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUV<sub>max</sub>) also showed diagnostic value for plasma EGFR-mutated patients (AUC 0.78). Additionally, combination of TP53 and EGFR mutations in plasma provided improved risk stratification for PFS (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients exhibiting metastasis, elevated levels of tumor markers and SUV<sub>max</sub> are more suitable for plasma EGFR mutation testing in clinical NSCLC management. Moreover, a positive plasma ctDNA test not only guides targeted therapy but also predicts a worse prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OncoTargets and therapy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"789-801\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12255349/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OncoTargets and therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S518837\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OncoTargets and therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S518837","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biomarker and Prognostic Value of Super-ARMS Detection for EGFR Mutation in Advanced NSCLC.
Background: ctDNA is a non-invasive and convenient method for detecting EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its sensitivity is lower than that of tissue-based testing. To enhance ctDNA detection efficiency, we identified the patient population most suitable for ctDNA testing, assessed the relationship between ctDNA and tumor markers, and examined the clinical significance of ctDNA in medical practice.
Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted, including 135 patients with NSCLC who underwent histological and liquid Super-ARMS tests. Of these, 92 patients with EGFR mutations detected in both tumor tissue and plasma were classified into the EGFRt+, p+ group, while 43 patients with EGFR mutations detected only in tumor tissue were classified into the EGFRt+, p- group. The clinical features and outcomes between these two groups were compared.
Results: The positivity rate of Super-ARMS test was 68.1% (92/135). The presence of EGFRt+, p+ in the Super-ARMS test was significantly associated with pleural effusion, bone, liver, and multiple organ metastases. Compared to the EGFRt+, p+ group, the EGFRt+, p- group had a significantly better PFS (P < 0.01). Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels demonstrated a strong predictive value for identifying plasma EGFR-mutated patients (AUC 0.828, sensitivity 68.8%, specificity 84.4%), while Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) also showed diagnostic value for plasma EGFR-mutated patients (AUC 0.78). Additionally, combination of TP53 and EGFR mutations in plasma provided improved risk stratification for PFS (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Patients exhibiting metastasis, elevated levels of tumor markers and SUVmax are more suitable for plasma EGFR mutation testing in clinical NSCLC management. Moreover, a positive plasma ctDNA test not only guides targeted therapy but also predicts a worse prognosis.
期刊介绍:
OncoTargets and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed journal focusing on molecular aspects of cancer research, that is, the molecular diagnosis of and targeted molecular or precision therapy for all types of cancer.
The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, basic science, reviews and evaluations, expert opinion and commentary that shed novel insight on a cancer or cancer subtype.
Specific topics covered by the journal include:
-Novel therapeutic targets and innovative agents
-Novel therapeutic regimens for improved benefit and/or decreased side effects
-Early stage clinical trials
Further considerations when submitting to OncoTargets and Therapy:
-Studies containing in vivo animal model data will be considered favorably.
-Tissue microarray analyses will not be considered except in cases where they are supported by comprehensive biological studies involving multiple cell lines.
-Biomarker association studies will be considered only when validated by comprehensive in vitro data and analysis of human tissue samples.
-Studies utilizing publicly available data (e.g. GWAS/TCGA/GEO etc.) should add to the body of knowledge about a specific disease or relevant phenotype and must be validated using the authors’ own data through replication in an independent sample set and functional follow-up.
-Bioinformatics studies must be validated using the authors’ own data through replication in an independent sample set and functional follow-up.
-Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) studies will not be considered.