液体活检在转移性乳腺癌中的临床应用——ESSO-EYSAC国际调查。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Ina Suppan, Dara Lundon, Pankaj Kumar Garg, Carmella Caballero, Ellen Heitzer, Andreas Brandl
{"title":"液体活检在转移性乳腺癌中的临床应用——ESSO-EYSAC国际调查。","authors":"Ina Suppan, Dara Lundon, Pankaj Kumar Garg, Carmella Caballero, Ellen Heitzer, Andreas Brandl","doi":"10.1002/jso.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although recommendations for using Liquid Biopsy (LB) approaches to guide therapeutic decisions in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) have been embedded in various guidelines, uptake in clinical practice is slow. Here, we aimed to assess the utilization and key issues for implementation of LB across Europe.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using the Redcap platform, we developed an online questionnaire including nineteen questions investigating three principal areas: respondent demographics; awareness, knowledge, and access to LB approaches; as well as future perspectives of LB. The survey was distributed to networks of surgical oncologists, via email, social media, and the ESSO-EYSAC website from March 2023 to May 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 292 breast cancer experts from 39 different countries completed the survey. Only 58 participants (20%) reported implementation of guidelines regarding LB testing. Overall, 119 participants (40.7%) indicated current use of liquid biopsy. The top three indications for LB utilization were \"clinical studies\" (n = 107, 36.8%), the \"evaluation of therapeutic possibilities\" (n = 109, 37.5%) and \"prognostication\" (n = 59, 20.3%). The major reasons for not using LB testing in the treatment of mBC patients were high costs and lack of reimbursement (n = 133, 38.7%) followed by lack of access (n = 126, 36.6%) and lack of evidence of the clinical utility (n = 62, 18.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LB testing is slowly becoming more popular in clinical practice, but still faces major difficulties such as high costs, and lack of reimbursement. More evidence is needed to show that individualization of treatment by utilization of LB leads to better outcome in mBC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Use of Liquid Biopsy in Metastatic Breast Cancer-An ESSO-EYSAC International Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Ina Suppan, Dara Lundon, Pankaj Kumar Garg, Carmella Caballero, Ellen Heitzer, Andreas Brandl\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.70045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although recommendations for using Liquid Biopsy (LB) approaches to guide therapeutic decisions in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) have been embedded in various guidelines, uptake in clinical practice is slow. Here, we aimed to assess the utilization and key issues for implementation of LB across Europe.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using the Redcap platform, we developed an online questionnaire including nineteen questions investigating three principal areas: respondent demographics; awareness, knowledge, and access to LB approaches; as well as future perspectives of LB. The survey was distributed to networks of surgical oncologists, via email, social media, and the ESSO-EYSAC website from March 2023 to May 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 292 breast cancer experts from 39 different countries completed the survey. Only 58 participants (20%) reported implementation of guidelines regarding LB testing. Overall, 119 participants (40.7%) indicated current use of liquid biopsy. The top three indications for LB utilization were \\\"clinical studies\\\" (n = 107, 36.8%), the \\\"evaluation of therapeutic possibilities\\\" (n = 109, 37.5%) and \\\"prognostication\\\" (n = 59, 20.3%). The major reasons for not using LB testing in the treatment of mBC patients were high costs and lack of reimbursement (n = 133, 38.7%) followed by lack of access (n = 126, 36.6%) and lack of evidence of the clinical utility (n = 62, 18.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LB testing is slowly becoming more popular in clinical practice, but still faces major difficulties such as high costs, and lack of reimbursement. More evidence is needed to show that individualization of treatment by utilization of LB leads to better outcome in mBC patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70045\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:尽管各种指南中都推荐使用液体活检(LB)方法指导转移性乳腺癌(mBC)的治疗决策,但在临床实践中的应用速度很慢。在这里,我们的目的是评估在欧洲实施LB的利用率和关键问题。材料和方法:使用Redcap平台,我们开发了一份在线问卷,包括19个问题,调查三个主要领域:受访者人口统计;对LB方法的认识、知识和获取;该调查于2023年3月至2023年5月通过电子邮件、社交媒体和ESSO-EYSAC网站分发给外科肿瘤学家网络。结果:共有来自39个不同国家的292名乳腺癌专家完成了调查。只有58名参与者(20%)报告实施了关于LB测试的指导方针。总体而言,119名参与者(40.7%)表示目前使用液体活检。使用LB的前3个适应症分别是“临床研究”(n = 107, 36.8%)、“治疗可能性评估”(n = 109, 37.5%)和“预后”(n = 59, 20.3%)。在治疗mBC患者中不使用LB检测的主要原因是费用高和缺乏报销(n = 133, 38.7%),其次是缺乏获取(n = 126, 36.6%)和缺乏临床效用证据(n = 62, 18.0%)。结论:LB检测在临床实践中逐渐普及,但仍面临成本高、缺乏报销等主要困难。需要更多的证据来证明利用LB的个体化治疗可以使mBC患者获得更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Use of Liquid Biopsy in Metastatic Breast Cancer-An ESSO-EYSAC International Survey.

Introduction: Although recommendations for using Liquid Biopsy (LB) approaches to guide therapeutic decisions in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) have been embedded in various guidelines, uptake in clinical practice is slow. Here, we aimed to assess the utilization and key issues for implementation of LB across Europe.

Materials and methods: Using the Redcap platform, we developed an online questionnaire including nineteen questions investigating three principal areas: respondent demographics; awareness, knowledge, and access to LB approaches; as well as future perspectives of LB. The survey was distributed to networks of surgical oncologists, via email, social media, and the ESSO-EYSAC website from March 2023 to May 2023.

Results: A total of 292 breast cancer experts from 39 different countries completed the survey. Only 58 participants (20%) reported implementation of guidelines regarding LB testing. Overall, 119 participants (40.7%) indicated current use of liquid biopsy. The top three indications for LB utilization were "clinical studies" (n = 107, 36.8%), the "evaluation of therapeutic possibilities" (n = 109, 37.5%) and "prognostication" (n = 59, 20.3%). The major reasons for not using LB testing in the treatment of mBC patients were high costs and lack of reimbursement (n = 133, 38.7%) followed by lack of access (n = 126, 36.6%) and lack of evidence of the clinical utility (n = 62, 18.0%).

Conclusion: LB testing is slowly becoming more popular in clinical practice, but still faces major difficulties such as high costs, and lack of reimbursement. More evidence is needed to show that individualization of treatment by utilization of LB leads to better outcome in mBC patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信