Ina Suppan, Dara Lundon, Pankaj Kumar Garg, Carmella Caballero, Ellen Heitzer, Andreas Brandl
{"title":"液体活检在转移性乳腺癌中的临床应用——ESSO-EYSAC国际调查。","authors":"Ina Suppan, Dara Lundon, Pankaj Kumar Garg, Carmella Caballero, Ellen Heitzer, Andreas Brandl","doi":"10.1002/jso.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although recommendations for using Liquid Biopsy (LB) approaches to guide therapeutic decisions in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) have been embedded in various guidelines, uptake in clinical practice is slow. Here, we aimed to assess the utilization and key issues for implementation of LB across Europe.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using the Redcap platform, we developed an online questionnaire including nineteen questions investigating three principal areas: respondent demographics; awareness, knowledge, and access to LB approaches; as well as future perspectives of LB. The survey was distributed to networks of surgical oncologists, via email, social media, and the ESSO-EYSAC website from March 2023 to May 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 292 breast cancer experts from 39 different countries completed the survey. Only 58 participants (20%) reported implementation of guidelines regarding LB testing. Overall, 119 participants (40.7%) indicated current use of liquid biopsy. The top three indications for LB utilization were \"clinical studies\" (n = 107, 36.8%), the \"evaluation of therapeutic possibilities\" (n = 109, 37.5%) and \"prognostication\" (n = 59, 20.3%). The major reasons for not using LB testing in the treatment of mBC patients were high costs and lack of reimbursement (n = 133, 38.7%) followed by lack of access (n = 126, 36.6%) and lack of evidence of the clinical utility (n = 62, 18.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LB testing is slowly becoming more popular in clinical practice, but still faces major difficulties such as high costs, and lack of reimbursement. More evidence is needed to show that individualization of treatment by utilization of LB leads to better outcome in mBC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Use of Liquid Biopsy in Metastatic Breast Cancer-An ESSO-EYSAC International Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Ina Suppan, Dara Lundon, Pankaj Kumar Garg, Carmella Caballero, Ellen Heitzer, Andreas Brandl\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.70045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although recommendations for using Liquid Biopsy (LB) approaches to guide therapeutic decisions in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) have been embedded in various guidelines, uptake in clinical practice is slow. Here, we aimed to assess the utilization and key issues for implementation of LB across Europe.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using the Redcap platform, we developed an online questionnaire including nineteen questions investigating three principal areas: respondent demographics; awareness, knowledge, and access to LB approaches; as well as future perspectives of LB. The survey was distributed to networks of surgical oncologists, via email, social media, and the ESSO-EYSAC website from March 2023 to May 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 292 breast cancer experts from 39 different countries completed the survey. Only 58 participants (20%) reported implementation of guidelines regarding LB testing. Overall, 119 participants (40.7%) indicated current use of liquid biopsy. The top three indications for LB utilization were \\\"clinical studies\\\" (n = 107, 36.8%), the \\\"evaluation of therapeutic possibilities\\\" (n = 109, 37.5%) and \\\"prognostication\\\" (n = 59, 20.3%). The major reasons for not using LB testing in the treatment of mBC patients were high costs and lack of reimbursement (n = 133, 38.7%) followed by lack of access (n = 126, 36.6%) and lack of evidence of the clinical utility (n = 62, 18.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LB testing is slowly becoming more popular in clinical practice, but still faces major difficulties such as high costs, and lack of reimbursement. More evidence is needed to show that individualization of treatment by utilization of LB leads to better outcome in mBC patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70045\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Use of Liquid Biopsy in Metastatic Breast Cancer-An ESSO-EYSAC International Survey.
Introduction: Although recommendations for using Liquid Biopsy (LB) approaches to guide therapeutic decisions in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) have been embedded in various guidelines, uptake in clinical practice is slow. Here, we aimed to assess the utilization and key issues for implementation of LB across Europe.
Materials and methods: Using the Redcap platform, we developed an online questionnaire including nineteen questions investigating three principal areas: respondent demographics; awareness, knowledge, and access to LB approaches; as well as future perspectives of LB. The survey was distributed to networks of surgical oncologists, via email, social media, and the ESSO-EYSAC website from March 2023 to May 2023.
Results: A total of 292 breast cancer experts from 39 different countries completed the survey. Only 58 participants (20%) reported implementation of guidelines regarding LB testing. Overall, 119 participants (40.7%) indicated current use of liquid biopsy. The top three indications for LB utilization were "clinical studies" (n = 107, 36.8%), the "evaluation of therapeutic possibilities" (n = 109, 37.5%) and "prognostication" (n = 59, 20.3%). The major reasons for not using LB testing in the treatment of mBC patients were high costs and lack of reimbursement (n = 133, 38.7%) followed by lack of access (n = 126, 36.6%) and lack of evidence of the clinical utility (n = 62, 18.0%).
Conclusion: LB testing is slowly becoming more popular in clinical practice, but still faces major difficulties such as high costs, and lack of reimbursement. More evidence is needed to show that individualization of treatment by utilization of LB leads to better outcome in mBC patients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.