超越成本:新兴市场生物仿制药采购的基于价值的框架——泰国的经验。

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-07-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2025.2526827
Anunchai Assawamakin, Nilawan Upakdee, Khachen Kongpakwattana
{"title":"超越成本:新兴市场生物仿制药采购的基于价值的框架——泰国的经验。","authors":"Anunchai Assawamakin, Nilawan Upakdee, Khachen Kongpakwattana","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2025.2526827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biosimilars offer potential for increased access to critical biological therapies in emerging-markets like Thailand. However, making procurement decisions for these complex molecules requires considering multiple factors beyond cost. This study aimed to develop and test a context-specific, value-based procurement framework for biosimilars in Thailand using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining a literature review with expert consensus workshops. The literature review identified existing biosimilar selection criteria, which were mapped onto the Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT) Value-Based Procurement (VBP) framework. Two expert consensus workshops were conducted to develop and refine a Thai-specific MCDA tool. The initial framework underwent a feasibility study in five hospitals across Thailand, with feedback incorporated into the refined version.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature review yielded seven relevant studies, predominantly from established markets. The expert workshops produced a tailored MCDA tool with seven key criteria: Quality Assessment, Stability Assessment, Comparability Exercise, Indications and Extrapolation, Pharmacovigilance and Risk Management, Real-World Evidence and Switching Studies, and Other Considerations. Each criterion was weighted based on its perceived importance in the Thai context. The feasibility study resulted in refinements, such as adjusting criterion weights and incorporating flexibility for hospital-specific priorities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents a comprehensive, context-specific MCDA tool for biosimilar procurement in Thailand. By balancing scientific rigour with practical considerations, this framework has the potential to optimise biosimilar selection, enhancing access to vital biological therapies while ensuring quality and cost-effectiveness. The approach taken to develop this framework could serve as an initiative for other emerging markets seeking to improve their biosimilar procurement strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"2526827"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247093/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond cost: a value-based framework for biosimilar procurement in emerging markets - the Thai experience.\",\"authors\":\"Anunchai Assawamakin, Nilawan Upakdee, Khachen Kongpakwattana\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20523211.2025.2526827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biosimilars offer potential for increased access to critical biological therapies in emerging-markets like Thailand. However, making procurement decisions for these complex molecules requires considering multiple factors beyond cost. This study aimed to develop and test a context-specific, value-based procurement framework for biosimilars in Thailand using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining a literature review with expert consensus workshops. The literature review identified existing biosimilar selection criteria, which were mapped onto the Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT) Value-Based Procurement (VBP) framework. Two expert consensus workshops were conducted to develop and refine a Thai-specific MCDA tool. The initial framework underwent a feasibility study in five hospitals across Thailand, with feedback incorporated into the refined version.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature review yielded seven relevant studies, predominantly from established markets. The expert workshops produced a tailored MCDA tool with seven key criteria: Quality Assessment, Stability Assessment, Comparability Exercise, Indications and Extrapolation, Pharmacovigilance and Risk Management, Real-World Evidence and Switching Studies, and Other Considerations. Each criterion was weighted based on its perceived importance in the Thai context. The feasibility study resulted in refinements, such as adjusting criterion weights and incorporating flexibility for hospital-specific priorities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents a comprehensive, context-specific MCDA tool for biosimilar procurement in Thailand. By balancing scientific rigour with practical considerations, this framework has the potential to optimise biosimilar selection, enhancing access to vital biological therapies while ensuring quality and cost-effectiveness. The approach taken to develop this framework could serve as an initiative for other emerging markets seeking to improve their biosimilar procurement strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"2526827\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247093/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2025.2526827\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2025.2526827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:生物仿制药为泰国等新兴市场提供了获得关键生物疗法的可能性。然而,这些复杂分子的采购决策需要考虑成本之外的多种因素。本研究旨在利用多标准决策分析(MCDA)开发和测试泰国生物仿制药的具体情况、基于价值的采购框架。方法:本研究采用混合方法,结合文献综述和专家共识研讨会。文献综述确定了现有的生物仿制药选择标准,并将其映射到最具经济优势招标(MEAT)基于价值的采购(VBP)框架。举办了两次专家共识讲习班,以发展和完善泰国特有的MCDA工具。最初的框架在泰国的五家医院进行了可行性研究,并将反馈意见纳入了改进版本。结果:文献综述产生了七项相关研究,主要来自成熟市场。专家研讨会制定了量身定制的MCDA工具,其中包括七个关键标准:质量评估、稳定性评估、可比性练习、适应症和外推、药物警戒和风险管理、真实世界证据和转换研究以及其他考虑因素。每个标准都是根据其在泰国情况下的重要性进行加权的。可行性研究的结果是改进,例如调整标准权重和纳入医院特定优先事项的灵活性。结论:本研究为泰国生物仿制药采购提供了一个全面的、具体情况的MCDA工具。通过平衡科学严谨性和实际考虑,该框架有可能优化生物类似药的选择,在确保质量和成本效益的同时,提高重要生物疗法的可及性。制定这一框架的方法可以作为其他新兴市场寻求改进其生物仿制药采购战略的倡议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond cost: a value-based framework for biosimilar procurement in emerging markets - the Thai experience.

Background: Biosimilars offer potential for increased access to critical biological therapies in emerging-markets like Thailand. However, making procurement decisions for these complex molecules requires considering multiple factors beyond cost. This study aimed to develop and test a context-specific, value-based procurement framework for biosimilars in Thailand using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA).

Methods: This study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining a literature review with expert consensus workshops. The literature review identified existing biosimilar selection criteria, which were mapped onto the Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT) Value-Based Procurement (VBP) framework. Two expert consensus workshops were conducted to develop and refine a Thai-specific MCDA tool. The initial framework underwent a feasibility study in five hospitals across Thailand, with feedback incorporated into the refined version.

Results: The literature review yielded seven relevant studies, predominantly from established markets. The expert workshops produced a tailored MCDA tool with seven key criteria: Quality Assessment, Stability Assessment, Comparability Exercise, Indications and Extrapolation, Pharmacovigilance and Risk Management, Real-World Evidence and Switching Studies, and Other Considerations. Each criterion was weighted based on its perceived importance in the Thai context. The feasibility study resulted in refinements, such as adjusting criterion weights and incorporating flexibility for hospital-specific priorities.

Conclusion: This study presents a comprehensive, context-specific MCDA tool for biosimilar procurement in Thailand. By balancing scientific rigour with practical considerations, this framework has the potential to optimise biosimilar selection, enhancing access to vital biological therapies while ensuring quality and cost-effectiveness. The approach taken to develop this framework could serve as an initiative for other emerging markets seeking to improve their biosimilar procurement strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信