{"title":"宠物生肉饲料中含有耐抗生素大肠杆菌、沙门氏菌和肠球菌的污染。","authors":"Rusmin Indra, Parinya Sroithongkham, Chavin Leelapsawas, Jitrapa Yindee, Siraphatson Wetchasirigul, Rungtip Chuanchuen, Pattrarat Chanchaithong","doi":"10.1111/jpn.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Raw meat-based diets (RMBDs) for pets, which contain raw meat from livestock, aquatic species, or wild-captive animals, are known to harbour feed-borne pathogens and antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria. This study investigated the contamination of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Enterococcus faecalis, and E. faecium in Thai RMBD products, focusing on their AMR phenotypic and genotypic properties. A total of 50 RMBD samples and five fresh-cooked diets (FCDs) were analysed for total aerobic colony counts (ACC) and the presence of third-generation cephalosporins (3GC)-resistant E. coli, Salmonella, E. faecalis, and E. faecium. The AMR phenotypes of isolated bacteria were determined using antimicrobial susceptibility testing and ESBL production, while bla<sub>CTX-M</sub> and mcr genes were detected by PCR assays. ACCs in RMBD samples were higher than those in FCD samples. The RMBD products tested positive for 3GC-resistant E. coli (n = 40, 80.0%), Salmonella spp. (n = 35, 70.0%), E. faecalis (n = 50, 100%), and E. faecium (n = 42, 84.0%). All 3GC-resistant E. coli isolates were ESBL producers carrying bla<sub>CTX-M</sub> group 1 and group 9. Among the Salmonella isolates, five ESBL-producing S. Infantis isolates carried bla<sub>CTX-M</sub> group 9. Two ESBL-producing E. coli and seven Salmonella isolates exhibited colistin resistance. No vancomycin resistance was observed in the enterococcal isolates. These findings underscore the high prevalence of Salmonella and ESBL-producing E. coli in RMBD products, emphasising the potential health risks associated with RMBD consumption for pets. This study highlights the need for awareness and preventive measures to mitigate AMR spread through pet foods.</p>","PeriodicalId":14942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contamination With Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Enterococcus in Raw Meat-Based Diets for Pets.\",\"authors\":\"Rusmin Indra, Parinya Sroithongkham, Chavin Leelapsawas, Jitrapa Yindee, Siraphatson Wetchasirigul, Rungtip Chuanchuen, Pattrarat Chanchaithong\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jpn.70004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Raw meat-based diets (RMBDs) for pets, which contain raw meat from livestock, aquatic species, or wild-captive animals, are known to harbour feed-borne pathogens and antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria. This study investigated the contamination of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Enterococcus faecalis, and E. faecium in Thai RMBD products, focusing on their AMR phenotypic and genotypic properties. A total of 50 RMBD samples and five fresh-cooked diets (FCDs) were analysed for total aerobic colony counts (ACC) and the presence of third-generation cephalosporins (3GC)-resistant E. coli, Salmonella, E. faecalis, and E. faecium. The AMR phenotypes of isolated bacteria were determined using antimicrobial susceptibility testing and ESBL production, while bla<sub>CTX-M</sub> and mcr genes were detected by PCR assays. ACCs in RMBD samples were higher than those in FCD samples. The RMBD products tested positive for 3GC-resistant E. coli (n = 40, 80.0%), Salmonella spp. (n = 35, 70.0%), E. faecalis (n = 50, 100%), and E. faecium (n = 42, 84.0%). All 3GC-resistant E. coli isolates were ESBL producers carrying bla<sub>CTX-M</sub> group 1 and group 9. Among the Salmonella isolates, five ESBL-producing S. Infantis isolates carried bla<sub>CTX-M</sub> group 9. Two ESBL-producing E. coli and seven Salmonella isolates exhibited colistin resistance. No vancomycin resistance was observed in the enterococcal isolates. These findings underscore the high prevalence of Salmonella and ESBL-producing E. coli in RMBD products, emphasising the potential health risks associated with RMBD consumption for pets. This study highlights the need for awareness and preventive measures to mitigate AMR spread through pet foods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.70004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.70004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Contamination With Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Enterococcus in Raw Meat-Based Diets for Pets.
Raw meat-based diets (RMBDs) for pets, which contain raw meat from livestock, aquatic species, or wild-captive animals, are known to harbour feed-borne pathogens and antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria. This study investigated the contamination of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Enterococcus faecalis, and E. faecium in Thai RMBD products, focusing on their AMR phenotypic and genotypic properties. A total of 50 RMBD samples and five fresh-cooked diets (FCDs) were analysed for total aerobic colony counts (ACC) and the presence of third-generation cephalosporins (3GC)-resistant E. coli, Salmonella, E. faecalis, and E. faecium. The AMR phenotypes of isolated bacteria were determined using antimicrobial susceptibility testing and ESBL production, while blaCTX-M and mcr genes were detected by PCR assays. ACCs in RMBD samples were higher than those in FCD samples. The RMBD products tested positive for 3GC-resistant E. coli (n = 40, 80.0%), Salmonella spp. (n = 35, 70.0%), E. faecalis (n = 50, 100%), and E. faecium (n = 42, 84.0%). All 3GC-resistant E. coli isolates were ESBL producers carrying blaCTX-M group 1 and group 9. Among the Salmonella isolates, five ESBL-producing S. Infantis isolates carried blaCTX-M group 9. Two ESBL-producing E. coli and seven Salmonella isolates exhibited colistin resistance. No vancomycin resistance was observed in the enterococcal isolates. These findings underscore the high prevalence of Salmonella and ESBL-producing E. coli in RMBD products, emphasising the potential health risks associated with RMBD consumption for pets. This study highlights the need for awareness and preventive measures to mitigate AMR spread through pet foods.
期刊介绍:
As an international forum for hypothesis-driven scientific research, the Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition publishes original papers in the fields of animal physiology, biochemistry and physiology of nutrition, animal nutrition, feed technology and preservation (only when related to animal nutrition). Well-conducted scientific work that meets the technical and ethical standards is considered only on the basis of scientific rigor.
Research on farm and companion animals is preferred. Comparative work on exotic species is welcome too. Pharmacological or toxicological experiments with a direct reference to nutrition are also considered. Manuscripts on fish and other aquatic non-mammals with topics on growth or nutrition will not be accepted. Manuscripts may be rejected on the grounds that the subject is too specialized or that the contribution they make to animal physiology and nutrition is insufficient.
In addition, reviews on topics of current interest within the scope of the journal are welcome. Authors are advised to send an outline to the Editorial Office for approval prior to submission.