Jessica M Lipschitz, Caleb Adler, Jorge Almeida, Shervin Assari, David Bond, Mason Breitzig, Ray DePaulo, Rif El-Mallakh, Jess Fiedorowicz, John Freshley, Gabriel Fries, Mark Frye, Fernando Goes, Robert Gonzalez, Rebekah Huber, Kay Jamison, Guodong Liu, Rodrigo Machado-Vieira, Pamela Mahon, Melvin G McInnis, Thomas Meyer, Youssef Nagy, John Nurnberger, Michael Ostacher, Sagar Parikh, Omar Pinjari, Kristin Raj, Matteo Respino, Marsal Sanches, Christopher Schneck, Manpreet Singh, Jair Soares, Steve Strakowski, Aimee Sullivan, Trisha Suppes, Michael Thase, Po Wang, Jeanette Waxmonsky, Deborah Yurgelun-Todd, Peter Zandi, Katherine E Burdick
{"title":"情绪障碍学习健康网络发展的考虑。","authors":"Jessica M Lipschitz, Caleb Adler, Jorge Almeida, Shervin Assari, David Bond, Mason Breitzig, Ray DePaulo, Rif El-Mallakh, Jess Fiedorowicz, John Freshley, Gabriel Fries, Mark Frye, Fernando Goes, Robert Gonzalez, Rebekah Huber, Kay Jamison, Guodong Liu, Rodrigo Machado-Vieira, Pamela Mahon, Melvin G McInnis, Thomas Meyer, Youssef Nagy, John Nurnberger, Michael Ostacher, Sagar Parikh, Omar Pinjari, Kristin Raj, Matteo Respino, Marsal Sanches, Christopher Schneck, Manpreet Singh, Jair Soares, Steve Strakowski, Aimee Sullivan, Trisha Suppes, Michael Thase, Po Wang, Jeanette Waxmonsky, Deborah Yurgelun-Todd, Peter Zandi, Katherine E Burdick","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.119904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Learning Health Networks (LHNs), such as the one described in Savitz et al. (in press), involve employing a network of treatment centers to produce standardized data from routine clinical practice, produce knowledge from that data, and systematically use that knowledge to inform care. To date, there are limited examples of LHNs in psychiatry. It is essential to establish robust dialogue around best practices for building LHNs to advance precision medicine in psychiatry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A task group consensus on key elements of LHNs as applied to mood disorders was convened. Task group members reviewed current literature and ongoing LHN network efforts and evaluated opportunities and gaps within psychiatry broadly, and mood disorders specifically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Task group members noted four key considerations for building LHNs for mood disorders. First, obtain qualitative and quantitative stakeholder input at every stage of development, specifically input from patients and patients' families, clinicians and health system leadership. Second, collect data on objective measures of functioning, such as neuropsychological testing, quality of life indicators, and blood-based markers of health, alongside more standard measures such as symptom severity. Third, carefully consider the details of how new evidence-based practices will be identified and implemented. Fourth, identify a plan for sustainability.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Literature was reviewed and discussed among expert task group members, but this was not a systematic review.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With stakeholder input, data on functioning as well as symptom severity, thoughtful implementation strategies, and an eye to sustainability, LHNs represent an important opportunity for advancement in the treatment of mood disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"119904"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Considerations in the development of learning health networks for mood disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica M Lipschitz, Caleb Adler, Jorge Almeida, Shervin Assari, David Bond, Mason Breitzig, Ray DePaulo, Rif El-Mallakh, Jess Fiedorowicz, John Freshley, Gabriel Fries, Mark Frye, Fernando Goes, Robert Gonzalez, Rebekah Huber, Kay Jamison, Guodong Liu, Rodrigo Machado-Vieira, Pamela Mahon, Melvin G McInnis, Thomas Meyer, Youssef Nagy, John Nurnberger, Michael Ostacher, Sagar Parikh, Omar Pinjari, Kristin Raj, Matteo Respino, Marsal Sanches, Christopher Schneck, Manpreet Singh, Jair Soares, Steve Strakowski, Aimee Sullivan, Trisha Suppes, Michael Thase, Po Wang, Jeanette Waxmonsky, Deborah Yurgelun-Todd, Peter Zandi, Katherine E Burdick\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jad.2025.119904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Learning Health Networks (LHNs), such as the one described in Savitz et al. (in press), involve employing a network of treatment centers to produce standardized data from routine clinical practice, produce knowledge from that data, and systematically use that knowledge to inform care. To date, there are limited examples of LHNs in psychiatry. It is essential to establish robust dialogue around best practices for building LHNs to advance precision medicine in psychiatry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A task group consensus on key elements of LHNs as applied to mood disorders was convened. Task group members reviewed current literature and ongoing LHN network efforts and evaluated opportunities and gaps within psychiatry broadly, and mood disorders specifically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Task group members noted four key considerations for building LHNs for mood disorders. First, obtain qualitative and quantitative stakeholder input at every stage of development, specifically input from patients and patients' families, clinicians and health system leadership. Second, collect data on objective measures of functioning, such as neuropsychological testing, quality of life indicators, and blood-based markers of health, alongside more standard measures such as symptom severity. Third, carefully consider the details of how new evidence-based practices will be identified and implemented. Fourth, identify a plan for sustainability.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Literature was reviewed and discussed among expert task group members, but this was not a systematic review.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With stakeholder input, data on functioning as well as symptom severity, thoughtful implementation strategies, and an eye to sustainability, LHNs represent an important opportunity for advancement in the treatment of mood disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"119904\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.119904\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.119904","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Considerations in the development of learning health networks for mood disorders.
Background: Learning Health Networks (LHNs), such as the one described in Savitz et al. (in press), involve employing a network of treatment centers to produce standardized data from routine clinical practice, produce knowledge from that data, and systematically use that knowledge to inform care. To date, there are limited examples of LHNs in psychiatry. It is essential to establish robust dialogue around best practices for building LHNs to advance precision medicine in psychiatry.
Methods: A task group consensus on key elements of LHNs as applied to mood disorders was convened. Task group members reviewed current literature and ongoing LHN network efforts and evaluated opportunities and gaps within psychiatry broadly, and mood disorders specifically.
Results: Task group members noted four key considerations for building LHNs for mood disorders. First, obtain qualitative and quantitative stakeholder input at every stage of development, specifically input from patients and patients' families, clinicians and health system leadership. Second, collect data on objective measures of functioning, such as neuropsychological testing, quality of life indicators, and blood-based markers of health, alongside more standard measures such as symptom severity. Third, carefully consider the details of how new evidence-based practices will be identified and implemented. Fourth, identify a plan for sustainability.
Limitations: Literature was reviewed and discussed among expert task group members, but this was not a systematic review.
Conclusions: With stakeholder input, data on functioning as well as symptom severity, thoughtful implementation strategies, and an eye to sustainability, LHNs represent an important opportunity for advancement in the treatment of mood disorders.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.