情绪障碍学习健康网络发展的考虑。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jessica M Lipschitz, Caleb Adler, Jorge Almeida, Shervin Assari, David Bond, Mason Breitzig, Ray DePaulo, Rif El-Mallakh, Jess Fiedorowicz, John Freshley, Gabriel Fries, Mark Frye, Fernando Goes, Robert Gonzalez, Rebekah Huber, Kay Jamison, Guodong Liu, Rodrigo Machado-Vieira, Pamela Mahon, Melvin G McInnis, Thomas Meyer, Youssef Nagy, John Nurnberger, Michael Ostacher, Sagar Parikh, Omar Pinjari, Kristin Raj, Matteo Respino, Marsal Sanches, Christopher Schneck, Manpreet Singh, Jair Soares, Steve Strakowski, Aimee Sullivan, Trisha Suppes, Michael Thase, Po Wang, Jeanette Waxmonsky, Deborah Yurgelun-Todd, Peter Zandi, Katherine E Burdick
{"title":"情绪障碍学习健康网络发展的考虑。","authors":"Jessica M Lipschitz, Caleb Adler, Jorge Almeida, Shervin Assari, David Bond, Mason Breitzig, Ray DePaulo, Rif El-Mallakh, Jess Fiedorowicz, John Freshley, Gabriel Fries, Mark Frye, Fernando Goes, Robert Gonzalez, Rebekah Huber, Kay Jamison, Guodong Liu, Rodrigo Machado-Vieira, Pamela Mahon, Melvin G McInnis, Thomas Meyer, Youssef Nagy, John Nurnberger, Michael Ostacher, Sagar Parikh, Omar Pinjari, Kristin Raj, Matteo Respino, Marsal Sanches, Christopher Schneck, Manpreet Singh, Jair Soares, Steve Strakowski, Aimee Sullivan, Trisha Suppes, Michael Thase, Po Wang, Jeanette Waxmonsky, Deborah Yurgelun-Todd, Peter Zandi, Katherine E Burdick","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.119904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Learning Health Networks (LHNs), such as the one described in Savitz et al. (in press), involve employing a network of treatment centers to produce standardized data from routine clinical practice, produce knowledge from that data, and systematically use that knowledge to inform care. To date, there are limited examples of LHNs in psychiatry. It is essential to establish robust dialogue around best practices for building LHNs to advance precision medicine in psychiatry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A task group consensus on key elements of LHNs as applied to mood disorders was convened. Task group members reviewed current literature and ongoing LHN network efforts and evaluated opportunities and gaps within psychiatry broadly, and mood disorders specifically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Task group members noted four key considerations for building LHNs for mood disorders. First, obtain qualitative and quantitative stakeholder input at every stage of development, specifically input from patients and patients' families, clinicians and health system leadership. Second, collect data on objective measures of functioning, such as neuropsychological testing, quality of life indicators, and blood-based markers of health, alongside more standard measures such as symptom severity. Third, carefully consider the details of how new evidence-based practices will be identified and implemented. Fourth, identify a plan for sustainability.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Literature was reviewed and discussed among expert task group members, but this was not a systematic review.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With stakeholder input, data on functioning as well as symptom severity, thoughtful implementation strategies, and an eye to sustainability, LHNs represent an important opportunity for advancement in the treatment of mood disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"119904"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Considerations in the development of learning health networks for mood disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica M Lipschitz, Caleb Adler, Jorge Almeida, Shervin Assari, David Bond, Mason Breitzig, Ray DePaulo, Rif El-Mallakh, Jess Fiedorowicz, John Freshley, Gabriel Fries, Mark Frye, Fernando Goes, Robert Gonzalez, Rebekah Huber, Kay Jamison, Guodong Liu, Rodrigo Machado-Vieira, Pamela Mahon, Melvin G McInnis, Thomas Meyer, Youssef Nagy, John Nurnberger, Michael Ostacher, Sagar Parikh, Omar Pinjari, Kristin Raj, Matteo Respino, Marsal Sanches, Christopher Schneck, Manpreet Singh, Jair Soares, Steve Strakowski, Aimee Sullivan, Trisha Suppes, Michael Thase, Po Wang, Jeanette Waxmonsky, Deborah Yurgelun-Todd, Peter Zandi, Katherine E Burdick\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jad.2025.119904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Learning Health Networks (LHNs), such as the one described in Savitz et al. (in press), involve employing a network of treatment centers to produce standardized data from routine clinical practice, produce knowledge from that data, and systematically use that knowledge to inform care. To date, there are limited examples of LHNs in psychiatry. It is essential to establish robust dialogue around best practices for building LHNs to advance precision medicine in psychiatry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A task group consensus on key elements of LHNs as applied to mood disorders was convened. Task group members reviewed current literature and ongoing LHN network efforts and evaluated opportunities and gaps within psychiatry broadly, and mood disorders specifically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Task group members noted four key considerations for building LHNs for mood disorders. First, obtain qualitative and quantitative stakeholder input at every stage of development, specifically input from patients and patients' families, clinicians and health system leadership. Second, collect data on objective measures of functioning, such as neuropsychological testing, quality of life indicators, and blood-based markers of health, alongside more standard measures such as symptom severity. Third, carefully consider the details of how new evidence-based practices will be identified and implemented. Fourth, identify a plan for sustainability.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Literature was reviewed and discussed among expert task group members, but this was not a systematic review.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With stakeholder input, data on functioning as well as symptom severity, thoughtful implementation strategies, and an eye to sustainability, LHNs represent an important opportunity for advancement in the treatment of mood disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"119904\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.119904\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.119904","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:学习健康网络(LHNs),如Savitz等人所描述的(即将出版),涉及使用一个治疗中心网络,从常规临床实践中产生标准化数据,从这些数据中产生知识,并系统地使用这些知识来告知护理。迄今为止,精神病学中lhn的例子有限。必须围绕建立lhn的最佳做法建立强有力的对话,以推进精神病学的精准医学。方法:召集一个任务小组就lhn应用于情绪障碍的关键要素达成共识。任务小组成员回顾了当前的文献和正在进行的LHN网络工作,并广泛评估了精神病学,特别是情绪障碍领域的机会和差距。结果:任务小组成员指出了建立情绪障碍lhn的四个关键考虑因素。首先,在发展的每个阶段获得定性和定量的利益攸关方投入,特别是来自患者和患者家属、临床医生和卫生系统领导层的投入。其次,收集客观功能测量的数据,如神经心理测试、生活质量指标和基于血液的健康指标,以及更标准的测量,如症状严重程度。第三,仔细考虑如何确定和实施新的循证实践的细节。第四,制定可持续发展计划。局限性:文献在专家任务小组成员中进行了回顾和讨论,但这不是一个系统的回顾。结论:有了利益相关者的意见,功能和症状严重程度的数据,深思熟虑的实施策略,以及对可持续性的关注,lhn代表了在情绪障碍治疗方面取得进展的重要机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Considerations in the development of learning health networks for mood disorders.

Background: Learning Health Networks (LHNs), such as the one described in Savitz et al. (in press), involve employing a network of treatment centers to produce standardized data from routine clinical practice, produce knowledge from that data, and systematically use that knowledge to inform care. To date, there are limited examples of LHNs in psychiatry. It is essential to establish robust dialogue around best practices for building LHNs to advance precision medicine in psychiatry.

Methods: A task group consensus on key elements of LHNs as applied to mood disorders was convened. Task group members reviewed current literature and ongoing LHN network efforts and evaluated opportunities and gaps within psychiatry broadly, and mood disorders specifically.

Results: Task group members noted four key considerations for building LHNs for mood disorders. First, obtain qualitative and quantitative stakeholder input at every stage of development, specifically input from patients and patients' families, clinicians and health system leadership. Second, collect data on objective measures of functioning, such as neuropsychological testing, quality of life indicators, and blood-based markers of health, alongside more standard measures such as symptom severity. Third, carefully consider the details of how new evidence-based practices will be identified and implemented. Fourth, identify a plan for sustainability.

Limitations: Literature was reviewed and discussed among expert task group members, but this was not a systematic review.

Conclusions: With stakeholder input, data on functioning as well as symptom severity, thoughtful implementation strategies, and an eye to sustainability, LHNs represent an important opportunity for advancement in the treatment of mood disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信