包括医疗点在内的环境中SARS-CoV-2的检测:Cobas SARS-CoV-2 NAT的性能和Cobas Liat系统的实用性。

IF 5.3 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Infectious Diseases and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-14 DOI:10.1007/s40121-025-01186-3
Myrto Bolanaki, Martin Möckel, Christopher Dodoo, Karen Gilliam, Elissa Robbins, D Jane Hata, Bruce White
{"title":"包括医疗点在内的环境中SARS-CoV-2的检测:Cobas SARS-CoV-2 NAT的性能和Cobas Liat系统的实用性。","authors":"Myrto Bolanaki, Martin Möckel, Christopher Dodoo, Karen Gilliam, Elissa Robbins, D Jane Hata, Bruce White","doi":"10.1007/s40121-025-01186-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a need to confirm the diagnostic performance of point-of-care (POC) testing for severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in emergency departments and time-sensitive outpatient settings. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of the Cobas<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test for use on the Cobas Liat System (POC SARS-CoV-2) with the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 Qualitative Assay for use on the Cobas 6800/8800 System (68/8800) when used to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection from clinical specimens collected at POC settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, two-site, non-interventional study, conducted in the US and Germany, collected fresh POC nasopharyngeal samples according to local procedures for upper respiratory swab sampling. Pairwise agreement was evaluated by estimating positive, negative, and overall percent agreement (PPA, NPA, and OPA, respectively) between POC SARS-CoV-2 and 68/8800 assays. Site-specific analyses were also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 317 evaluable samples were collected from March 30 to July 2023 (US site) and from November 7, 2023 to April 4, 2024 (German site). Relative to 68/8800, POC SARS-CoV-2 had a PPA of 98.8% (169/171) and an NPA of 90.4% (132/146), while the OPA was 95.0%. Site-specific analyses were broadly comparable to the overall results, although enrichment for positive samples at the US site resulted in a PPA and NPA of 98.6% (139/141) and 55.6% (5/9), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POC SARS-CoV-2 used in both POC and central laboratory settings showed good overall diagnostic performance relative to 68/8800, a widely used and accurate laboratory-based test, for detecting SARS-CoV-2. Efficient POC testing will help improve the timely management of SARS-CoV-2 infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":13592,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1815-1827"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Settings Including Point-of-Care: Performance of the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 NAT and Utility with the Cobas Liat System.\",\"authors\":\"Myrto Bolanaki, Martin Möckel, Christopher Dodoo, Karen Gilliam, Elissa Robbins, D Jane Hata, Bruce White\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40121-025-01186-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a need to confirm the diagnostic performance of point-of-care (POC) testing for severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in emergency departments and time-sensitive outpatient settings. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of the Cobas<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test for use on the Cobas Liat System (POC SARS-CoV-2) with the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 Qualitative Assay for use on the Cobas 6800/8800 System (68/8800) when used to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection from clinical specimens collected at POC settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, two-site, non-interventional study, conducted in the US and Germany, collected fresh POC nasopharyngeal samples according to local procedures for upper respiratory swab sampling. Pairwise agreement was evaluated by estimating positive, negative, and overall percent agreement (PPA, NPA, and OPA, respectively) between POC SARS-CoV-2 and 68/8800 assays. Site-specific analyses were also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 317 evaluable samples were collected from March 30 to July 2023 (US site) and from November 7, 2023 to April 4, 2024 (German site). Relative to 68/8800, POC SARS-CoV-2 had a PPA of 98.8% (169/171) and an NPA of 90.4% (132/146), while the OPA was 95.0%. Site-specific analyses were broadly comparable to the overall results, although enrichment for positive samples at the US site resulted in a PPA and NPA of 98.6% (139/141) and 55.6% (5/9), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POC SARS-CoV-2 used in both POC and central laboratory settings showed good overall diagnostic performance relative to 68/8800, a widely used and accurate laboratory-based test, for detecting SARS-CoV-2. Efficient POC testing will help improve the timely management of SARS-CoV-2 infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious Diseases and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1815-1827\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339825/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious Diseases and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-025-01186-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-025-01186-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在急诊科和时间敏感的门诊机构中,有必要确认重症急性呼吸道冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)的即时检测(POC)诊断性能。本研究旨在比较Cobas Liat系统上使用的Cobas®SARS-CoV-2核酸检测(POC SARS-CoV-2)与Cobas 6800/8800系统(68/8800)上使用的Cobas SARS-CoV-2定性分析(Cobas - cov -2定性分析)在检测POC环境采集的临床标本中的SARS-CoV-2感染时的诊断性能。方法:这项前瞻性、双中心、非介入性研究在美国和德国进行,根据当地上呼吸道拭子取样程序收集新鲜POC鼻咽样本。通过估计POC SARS-CoV-2和68/8800测定之间的阳性、阴性和总体一致性百分比(分别为PPA、NPA和OPA)来评估两两一致性。还进行了特定地点的分析。结果:总体而言,从2023年3月30日至7月(美国站点)和从2023年11月7日至2024年4月4日(德国站点)收集了317份可评估样本。与68/8800相比,POC SARS-CoV-2的PPA为98.8% (169/171),NPA为90.4% (132/146),OPA为95.0%。位点特异性分析与总体结果大致相当,尽管在美国位点富集阳性样品的PPA和NPA分别为98.6%(139/141)和55.6%(5/9)。结论:相对于广泛使用且准确的68/8800实验室检测SARS-CoV-2,在POC和中心实验室环境中使用的POC SARS-CoV-2总体诊断性能较好。有效的POC检测将有助于改善对SARS-CoV-2感染的及时管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Settings Including Point-of-Care: Performance of the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 NAT and Utility with the Cobas Liat System.

Introduction: There is a need to confirm the diagnostic performance of point-of-care (POC) testing for severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in emergency departments and time-sensitive outpatient settings. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of the Cobas® SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test for use on the Cobas Liat System (POC SARS-CoV-2) with the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 Qualitative Assay for use on the Cobas 6800/8800 System (68/8800) when used to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection from clinical specimens collected at POC settings.

Methods: This prospective, two-site, non-interventional study, conducted in the US and Germany, collected fresh POC nasopharyngeal samples according to local procedures for upper respiratory swab sampling. Pairwise agreement was evaluated by estimating positive, negative, and overall percent agreement (PPA, NPA, and OPA, respectively) between POC SARS-CoV-2 and 68/8800 assays. Site-specific analyses were also conducted.

Results: Overall, 317 evaluable samples were collected from March 30 to July 2023 (US site) and from November 7, 2023 to April 4, 2024 (German site). Relative to 68/8800, POC SARS-CoV-2 had a PPA of 98.8% (169/171) and an NPA of 90.4% (132/146), while the OPA was 95.0%. Site-specific analyses were broadly comparable to the overall results, although enrichment for positive samples at the US site resulted in a PPA and NPA of 98.6% (139/141) and 55.6% (5/9), respectively.

Conclusion: POC SARS-CoV-2 used in both POC and central laboratory settings showed good overall diagnostic performance relative to 68/8800, a widely used and accurate laboratory-based test, for detecting SARS-CoV-2. Efficient POC testing will help improve the timely management of SARS-CoV-2 infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
Infectious Diseases and Therapy Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
136
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of infectious disease therapies and interventions, including vaccines and devices. Studies relating to diagnostic products and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, bacterial and fungal infections, viral infections (including HIV/AIDS and hepatitis), parasitological diseases, tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, vaccinations and other interventions, and drug-resistance, chronic infections, epidemiology and tropical, emergent, pediatric, dermal and sexually-transmitted diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信