全髋关节置换术中假关节感染的一期翻修治疗。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-05-21 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1007/s43465-025-01405-6
H Humphries, W Wignadasan, A Fontalis, A Alsheddi, M Shaeir, F S Haddad
{"title":"全髋关节置换术中假关节感染的一期翻修治疗。","authors":"H Humphries, W Wignadasan, A Fontalis, A Alsheddi, M Shaeir, F S Haddad","doi":"10.1007/s43465-025-01405-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a highly successful procedure for managing hip osteoarthritis, with increasing numbers performed yearly. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication which remains one of the leading causes of implant failure and is increasing in prevalence, resulting in significant morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Traditional management of PJI has relied on two-stage revision, but recent evidence suggests that single-stage revision may be an effective alternative for select patients. This review looks at the pathogenesis, diagnosis and classification of PJI in THA, and examines the current literature on single-stage revision for PJI in THA, including its indications, surgical technique, and clinical outcomes. Indication of the procedure is determined by the patient comorbidities and biology, and micro-organism characteristics. The surgical technique involves the removal of infected implants, thorough debridement, and reimplantation of a new prosthesis within the same procedure. Single-stage revision is associated with reduced hospital stays, lower costs, and improved patient satisfaction compared to two-stage revision. While successful eradication of infection depends on factors such as host immunity, pathogen virulence, and soft tissue viability, studies have demonstrated comparable or superior infection-free survival rates for single-stage revision. Recent advances in microbiological diagnostics, biofilm disruption techniques, and multidisciplinary perioperative management have further enhanced the efficacy of single-stage revision. Despite some contraindications, including highly resistant organisms and severe soft tissue compromise, high-volume centers have expanded their indications with promising results. As the demand for THA continues to rise, optimizing PJI treatment strategies is critical. This review highlights the growing role of single-stage revision as a viable and cost effective approach for managing PJI in carefully selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"59 7","pages":"901-909"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254459/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-Stage Revision for Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infection in Total Hip Arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"H Humphries, W Wignadasan, A Fontalis, A Alsheddi, M Shaeir, F S Haddad\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43465-025-01405-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a highly successful procedure for managing hip osteoarthritis, with increasing numbers performed yearly. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication which remains one of the leading causes of implant failure and is increasing in prevalence, resulting in significant morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Traditional management of PJI has relied on two-stage revision, but recent evidence suggests that single-stage revision may be an effective alternative for select patients. This review looks at the pathogenesis, diagnosis and classification of PJI in THA, and examines the current literature on single-stage revision for PJI in THA, including its indications, surgical technique, and clinical outcomes. Indication of the procedure is determined by the patient comorbidities and biology, and micro-organism characteristics. The surgical technique involves the removal of infected implants, thorough debridement, and reimplantation of a new prosthesis within the same procedure. Single-stage revision is associated with reduced hospital stays, lower costs, and improved patient satisfaction compared to two-stage revision. While successful eradication of infection depends on factors such as host immunity, pathogen virulence, and soft tissue viability, studies have demonstrated comparable or superior infection-free survival rates for single-stage revision. Recent advances in microbiological diagnostics, biofilm disruption techniques, and multidisciplinary perioperative management have further enhanced the efficacy of single-stage revision. Despite some contraindications, including highly resistant organisms and severe soft tissue compromise, high-volume centers have expanded their indications with promising results. As the demand for THA continues to rise, optimizing PJI treatment strategies is critical. This review highlights the growing role of single-stage revision as a viable and cost effective approach for managing PJI in carefully selected patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"59 7\",\"pages\":\"901-909\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254459/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-025-01405-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-025-01405-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全髋关节置换术(THA)是一种非常成功的治疗髋关节骨关节炎的方法,每年的手术数量都在增加。假体关节感染(PJI)是一种毁灭性的并发症,它仍然是导致假体失败的主要原因之一,并且患病率正在增加,导致显著的发病率、死亡率和经济负担。PJI的传统管理依赖于两阶段翻修,但最近的证据表明,单阶段翻修可能是一种有效的选择。本文综述了THA中PJI的发病机制、诊断和分类,并检查了目前关于THA中PJI单阶段翻修的文献,包括其适应症、手术技术和临床结果。手术的适应症取决于患者的合并症、生物学和微生物特征。手术技术包括移除感染的假体,彻底清创,并在同一程序内重新植入新的假体。与两阶段翻修相比,单阶段翻修可缩短住院时间、降低成本并提高患者满意度。虽然感染的成功根除取决于宿主免疫、病原体毒力和软组织活力等因素,但研究表明,单期修复的无感染存活率相当或更高。微生物诊断、生物膜破坏技术和多学科围手术期管理的最新进展进一步提高了单期翻修的疗效。尽管存在一些禁忌症,包括高度耐药的生物体和严重的软组织损害,但大容量中心已经扩大了它们的适应症,并取得了令人满意的结果。随着全髋关节置换术的需求持续上升,优化PJI治疗策略至关重要。这篇综述强调了在精心挑选的患者中,单阶段翻修作为一种可行且成本有效的治疗PJI的方法日益重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single-Stage Revision for Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infection in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a highly successful procedure for managing hip osteoarthritis, with increasing numbers performed yearly. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication which remains one of the leading causes of implant failure and is increasing in prevalence, resulting in significant morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Traditional management of PJI has relied on two-stage revision, but recent evidence suggests that single-stage revision may be an effective alternative for select patients. This review looks at the pathogenesis, diagnosis and classification of PJI in THA, and examines the current literature on single-stage revision for PJI in THA, including its indications, surgical technique, and clinical outcomes. Indication of the procedure is determined by the patient comorbidities and biology, and micro-organism characteristics. The surgical technique involves the removal of infected implants, thorough debridement, and reimplantation of a new prosthesis within the same procedure. Single-stage revision is associated with reduced hospital stays, lower costs, and improved patient satisfaction compared to two-stage revision. While successful eradication of infection depends on factors such as host immunity, pathogen virulence, and soft tissue viability, studies have demonstrated comparable or superior infection-free survival rates for single-stage revision. Recent advances in microbiological diagnostics, biofilm disruption techniques, and multidisciplinary perioperative management have further enhanced the efficacy of single-stage revision. Despite some contraindications, including highly resistant organisms and severe soft tissue compromise, high-volume centers have expanded their indications with promising results. As the demand for THA continues to rise, optimizing PJI treatment strategies is critical. This review highlights the growing role of single-stage revision as a viable and cost effective approach for managing PJI in carefully selected patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信