酒精使用障碍群体治疗后高、低风险饮酒的预测因素

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Kristoffer Høiland, Espen Kristian Ajo Arnevik, Lien My Diep, Tove Mathisen, Anette Søgaard Nielsen, Jens Egeland
{"title":"酒精使用障碍群体治疗后高、低风险饮酒的预测因素","authors":"Kristoffer Høiland, Espen Kristian Ajo Arnevik, Lien My Diep, Tove Mathisen, Anette Søgaard Nielsen, Jens Egeland","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2025.10047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the factors influencing alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment outcomes is essential. More knowledge about patient characteristics that predict treatment outcomes can help personalise interventions, improve treatment planning and address the needs of specific subgroups. The frequency of treatment attendance may also affect drinking outcomes after treatment. Despite research efforts, uncertainty remains about how patient factors and treatment attendance influence treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine how patient factors and treatment attendance predict high- or low-risk drinking at the end of treatment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used data (<i>N</i> = 92) from a multisite observational study of treatment-seeking individuals with AUD attending group treatment. Sociodemographic measures, alcohol and substance use measures, cognitive functioning, psychological distress, personality functioning and quality of life were screened in univariate analyses. Significant variables were entered into a binary logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with a higher percentage of treatment attendance (odds ratio 0.96 [95% CI 0.93, 0.96]) and with greater responsiblity scores on the Severity Indices of Personality Functioning (odds ratio 0.30 [95% CI 0.14, 0.64]) had a decreased likelihood of high-risk drinking at treatment end. Substance use, psychological distress and cognitive functioning were not associated with drinking levels at the end of treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A higher percentage of treatment attendance has a minor effect on drinking levels. Being more responsible, as reflected in higher scores on the responsibility domain, reduces the likelihood of high-risk drinking at the end of treatment. Clinicians are encouraged to screen and assess personality functioning when planning treatment for individuals with AUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 4","pages":"e150"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of high- and low-risk drinking after group treatment for alcohol use disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Kristoffer Høiland, Espen Kristian Ajo Arnevik, Lien My Diep, Tove Mathisen, Anette Søgaard Nielsen, Jens Egeland\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjo.2025.10047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the factors influencing alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment outcomes is essential. More knowledge about patient characteristics that predict treatment outcomes can help personalise interventions, improve treatment planning and address the needs of specific subgroups. The frequency of treatment attendance may also affect drinking outcomes after treatment. Despite research efforts, uncertainty remains about how patient factors and treatment attendance influence treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine how patient factors and treatment attendance predict high- or low-risk drinking at the end of treatment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used data (<i>N</i> = 92) from a multisite observational study of treatment-seeking individuals with AUD attending group treatment. Sociodemographic measures, alcohol and substance use measures, cognitive functioning, psychological distress, personality functioning and quality of life were screened in univariate analyses. Significant variables were entered into a binary logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with a higher percentage of treatment attendance (odds ratio 0.96 [95% CI 0.93, 0.96]) and with greater responsiblity scores on the Severity Indices of Personality Functioning (odds ratio 0.30 [95% CI 0.14, 0.64]) had a decreased likelihood of high-risk drinking at treatment end. Substance use, psychological distress and cognitive functioning were not associated with drinking levels at the end of treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A higher percentage of treatment attendance has a minor effect on drinking levels. Being more responsible, as reflected in higher scores on the responsibility domain, reduces the likelihood of high-risk drinking at the end of treatment. Clinicians are encouraged to screen and assess personality functioning when planning treatment for individuals with AUD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"e150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10047\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:了解影响酒精使用障碍(AUD)治疗结果的因素至关重要。对患者特征的更多了解可以预测治疗结果,有助于个性化干预,改进治疗计划并满足特定亚组的需求。参加治疗的频率也可能影响治疗后的饮酒结果。尽管研究努力,患者因素和治疗出席率如何影响治疗结果的不确定性仍然存在。目的:研究患者因素和治疗出勤率如何预测治疗结束时的高风险或低风险饮酒。方法:我们使用的数据(N = 92)来自寻求治疗的AUD患者参加小组治疗的多地点观察性研究。在单变量分析中筛选了社会人口统计指标、酒精和物质使用指标、认知功能、心理困扰、人格功能和生活质量。将显著变量输入二元逻辑回归模型。结果:治疗出勤率较高的个体(优势比0.96 [95% CI 0.93, 0.96])和人格功能严重程度指数责任得分较高的个体(优势比0.30 [95% CI 0.14, 0.64])在治疗结束时高危饮酒的可能性降低。药物使用、心理困扰和认知功能与治疗结束时的饮酒水平无关。结论:较高的治疗出勤率对饮酒水平的影响较小。在责任领域得分越高,表现出的责任感越强,在治疗结束时高风险饮酒的可能性就越低。临床医生在为AUD患者制定治疗计划时,被鼓励筛查和评估人格功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors of high- and low-risk drinking after group treatment for alcohol use disorder.

Background: Understanding the factors influencing alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment outcomes is essential. More knowledge about patient characteristics that predict treatment outcomes can help personalise interventions, improve treatment planning and address the needs of specific subgroups. The frequency of treatment attendance may also affect drinking outcomes after treatment. Despite research efforts, uncertainty remains about how patient factors and treatment attendance influence treatment outcomes.

Aims: To examine how patient factors and treatment attendance predict high- or low-risk drinking at the end of treatment.

Method: We used data (N = 92) from a multisite observational study of treatment-seeking individuals with AUD attending group treatment. Sociodemographic measures, alcohol and substance use measures, cognitive functioning, psychological distress, personality functioning and quality of life were screened in univariate analyses. Significant variables were entered into a binary logistic regression model.

Results: Individuals with a higher percentage of treatment attendance (odds ratio 0.96 [95% CI 0.93, 0.96]) and with greater responsiblity scores on the Severity Indices of Personality Functioning (odds ratio 0.30 [95% CI 0.14, 0.64]) had a decreased likelihood of high-risk drinking at treatment end. Substance use, psychological distress and cognitive functioning were not associated with drinking levels at the end of treatment.

Conclusion: A higher percentage of treatment attendance has a minor effect on drinking levels. Being more responsible, as reflected in higher scores on the responsibility domain, reduces the likelihood of high-risk drinking at the end of treatment. Clinicians are encouraged to screen and assess personality functioning when planning treatment for individuals with AUD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信