脊柱桥接骨化对屈伸载荷下力学性能和骨折耐受性的影响。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Elizabeth A. Rapp van Roden, Corinne N. Riggin, Derek T. Holyoak, Dhara Amin, Patrick Hall, Juan Jose Paredes, Cynthia Day, Kathleen A. Rodowicz, Ryan Siskey, Michael R. Carhart
{"title":"脊柱桥接骨化对屈伸载荷下力学性能和骨折耐受性的影响。","authors":"Elizabeth A. Rapp van Roden,&nbsp;Corinne N. Riggin,&nbsp;Derek T. Holyoak,&nbsp;Dhara Amin,&nbsp;Patrick Hall,&nbsp;Juan Jose Paredes,&nbsp;Cynthia Day,&nbsp;Kathleen A. Rodowicz,&nbsp;Ryan Siskey,&nbsp;Michael R. Carhart","doi":"10.1007/s10439-025-03790-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) is characterized by “flowing” ossifications that form along the anterolateral aspect of contiguous vertebrae. While prior literature has identified that DISH patients are susceptible to spinal injury, the DISH-specific differences in mechanical response of human spines to applied bending have not been quantified. Therefore, the purpose of this work was to assess the effect of DISH on range of motion, stiffness, and fracture tolerance under flexion/extension loading.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Seven human cadaveric spines were dissected into specimens composed of three functional spinal units (3FSUs), spanning levels T1–T4, T5–T8, and T9–T12. For each 3FSU specimen, the presence of bridging DISH ossification was determined. Ten DISH-affected and eleven normal specimens were evaluated under flexion/extension range of motion followed by extension to failure/system limits.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>DISH-affected specimens had significantly less range of motion compared to normal specimens (1.8 deg vs. 3.2 deg, p = 0.0125) and were significantly stiffer (5.5 N·m/deg vs. 2.9 N·m/deg, p = 0.0167). All DISH-affected specimens fractured during extension to failure, whereas five normal specimens did not fracture under the test loading. Hazard ratio analyses indicated that DISH-affected specimens are four times more likely to fracture compared to normal specimens under a given torque and sixteen times more likely for a given extension angle. The normal specimen median energy at fracture was significantly greater than the DISH-affected group (301 Nm·deg vs. 81 Nm·deg, p = 0.006).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study demonstrates a significant increase in the injury potential of DISH spines during bending loading and provides the first quantitative support for clinical observations of compromised fracture tolerance within the DISH population. Future work classifying the severity of DISH in the context of mechanical response may assist in radiological identification of otherwise asymptomatic patients with increased potential for injury.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7986,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","volume":"53 10","pages":"2679 - 2688"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Spinal Bridging Ossification on Mechanical Properties and Fracture Tolerance Under Flexion/Extension Loading\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth A. Rapp van Roden,&nbsp;Corinne N. Riggin,&nbsp;Derek T. Holyoak,&nbsp;Dhara Amin,&nbsp;Patrick Hall,&nbsp;Juan Jose Paredes,&nbsp;Cynthia Day,&nbsp;Kathleen A. Rodowicz,&nbsp;Ryan Siskey,&nbsp;Michael R. Carhart\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10439-025-03790-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) is characterized by “flowing” ossifications that form along the anterolateral aspect of contiguous vertebrae. While prior literature has identified that DISH patients are susceptible to spinal injury, the DISH-specific differences in mechanical response of human spines to applied bending have not been quantified. Therefore, the purpose of this work was to assess the effect of DISH on range of motion, stiffness, and fracture tolerance under flexion/extension loading.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Seven human cadaveric spines were dissected into specimens composed of three functional spinal units (3FSUs), spanning levels T1–T4, T5–T8, and T9–T12. For each 3FSU specimen, the presence of bridging DISH ossification was determined. Ten DISH-affected and eleven normal specimens were evaluated under flexion/extension range of motion followed by extension to failure/system limits.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>DISH-affected specimens had significantly less range of motion compared to normal specimens (1.8 deg vs. 3.2 deg, p = 0.0125) and were significantly stiffer (5.5 N·m/deg vs. 2.9 N·m/deg, p = 0.0167). All DISH-affected specimens fractured during extension to failure, whereas five normal specimens did not fracture under the test loading. Hazard ratio analyses indicated that DISH-affected specimens are four times more likely to fracture compared to normal specimens under a given torque and sixteen times more likely for a given extension angle. The normal specimen median energy at fracture was significantly greater than the DISH-affected group (301 Nm·deg vs. 81 Nm·deg, p = 0.006).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study demonstrates a significant increase in the injury potential of DISH spines during bending loading and provides the first quantitative support for clinical observations of compromised fracture tolerance within the DISH population. Future work classifying the severity of DISH in the context of mechanical response may assist in radiological identification of otherwise asymptomatic patients with increased potential for injury.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"53 10\",\"pages\":\"2679 - 2688\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10439-025-03790-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10439-025-03790-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:弥漫性特发性骨骼肥厚症(DISH)的特征是沿连续椎骨的前外侧形成“流动”骨化。虽然先前的文献已经确定DISH患者容易发生脊柱损伤,但尚未量化DISH患者脊柱对施加弯曲的机械反应的特异性差异。因此,本研究的目的是评估DISH在屈伸载荷下对活动范围、刚度和骨折容忍度的影响。方法:将7条人体尸体脊柱解剖成3个功能脊柱单元(3fsu),跨越T1-T4、T5-T8和T9-T12水平。对于每个3FSU标本,确定存在桥接DISH骨化。10个受dish影响的标本和11个正常标本在屈曲/伸展运动范围下进行评估,然后扩展到失效/系统极限。结果:与正常标本相比,受dish影响的标本的活动范围明显小于正常标本(1.8度对3.2度,p = 0.0125),并且明显更僵硬(5.5 N·m/度对2.9 N·m/度,p = 0.0167)。所有受dish影响的试件在延伸至破坏过程中均发生断裂,而5个正常试件在试验载荷下未发生断裂。风险比分析表明,在给定扭矩下,受dish影响的标本骨折的可能性是正常标本的4倍,在给定延伸角度下骨折的可能性是正常标本的16倍。正常标本骨折处的中位能明显大于dish影响组(301 Nm·deg vs 81 Nm·deg, p = 0.006)。结论:本研究表明,在弯曲载荷下,DISH脊柱的损伤潜力显著增加,并为DISH人群骨折耐受性受损的临床观察提供了第一个定量支持。在机械反应的背景下,对DISH的严重程度进行分类的未来工作可能有助于放射学识别其他无症状但损伤可能性增加的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of Spinal Bridging Ossification on Mechanical Properties and Fracture Tolerance Under Flexion/Extension Loading

Purpose

Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) is characterized by “flowing” ossifications that form along the anterolateral aspect of contiguous vertebrae. While prior literature has identified that DISH patients are susceptible to spinal injury, the DISH-specific differences in mechanical response of human spines to applied bending have not been quantified. Therefore, the purpose of this work was to assess the effect of DISH on range of motion, stiffness, and fracture tolerance under flexion/extension loading.

Methods

Seven human cadaveric spines were dissected into specimens composed of three functional spinal units (3FSUs), spanning levels T1–T4, T5–T8, and T9–T12. For each 3FSU specimen, the presence of bridging DISH ossification was determined. Ten DISH-affected and eleven normal specimens were evaluated under flexion/extension range of motion followed by extension to failure/system limits.

Results

DISH-affected specimens had significantly less range of motion compared to normal specimens (1.8 deg vs. 3.2 deg, p = 0.0125) and were significantly stiffer (5.5 N·m/deg vs. 2.9 N·m/deg, p = 0.0167). All DISH-affected specimens fractured during extension to failure, whereas five normal specimens did not fracture under the test loading. Hazard ratio analyses indicated that DISH-affected specimens are four times more likely to fracture compared to normal specimens under a given torque and sixteen times more likely for a given extension angle. The normal specimen median energy at fracture was significantly greater than the DISH-affected group (301 Nm·deg vs. 81 Nm·deg, p = 0.006).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates a significant increase in the injury potential of DISH spines during bending loading and provides the first quantitative support for clinical observations of compromised fracture tolerance within the DISH population. Future work classifying the severity of DISH in the context of mechanical response may assist in radiological identification of otherwise asymptomatic patients with increased potential for injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Annals of Biomedical Engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.80%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Biomedical Engineering is an official journal of the Biomedical Engineering Society, publishing original articles in the major fields of bioengineering and biomedical engineering. The Annals is an interdisciplinary and international journal with the aim to highlight integrated approaches to the solutions of biological and biomedical problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信