慢性风湿病非药物治疗人工智能支持干预的范围综述

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Nirali Shah, Alexis Castellanos, Yen T Chen, John D Piette, Amy Bucher, Susan L Murphy
{"title":"慢性风湿病非药物治疗人工智能支持干预的范围综述","authors":"Nirali Shah, Alexis Castellanos, Yen T Chen, John D Piette, Amy Bucher, Susan L Murphy","doi":"10.1002/acr.25612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review summarizes AI-supported non-pharmacological interventions for adults with chronic rheumatic diseases, detailing their components, purpose, and current evidence base. We searched Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases for studies describing AI-supported interventions for adults with chronic rheumatic diseases. Eligible interventions targeted clinical outcomes (pain, function, disability, fatigue), psychological measures (depression, anxiety), or behavioral outcomes (physical activity, nutrition). All publication types (journal articles, conference abstracts, protocols) published in English language until January 19, 2025, were considered, and interventions of any duration, frequency, country of origin, or setting (inpatient, outpatient, community, and home setting) were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies and one extracted data on study characteristics, intervention components, AI methodologies, and outcomes. Fifteen AI-supported interventions were identified, primarily targeting osteoarthritis (OA) (73%) and focusing on education and exercise advice (67%). The most common AI tool was rule-based expert systems (40%), followed by natural language processing systems (33%) and machine learning algorithms (27%). The interventions ranged from 3 weeks to 12 months, while sample sizes ranged from 7 to 427 participants reflecting huge variability across studies. Most interventions demonstrated high usability, engagement, and adherence. Improvements in exercise compliance, physical activity, and symptoms such as pain and physical function were reported, though effects varied across studies and were sometimes not sustained long-term. AI-supported interventions show promise in promoting education, exercise, and behavioral guidance for adults with chronic rheumatic diseases. There is evidence for high usability and engagement but the clinical impact on long-term symptom management is uncertain.</p>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Scoping Review on AI-Supported Interventions for Non-Pharmacological Management of Chronic Rheumatic Diseases.\",\"authors\":\"Nirali Shah, Alexis Castellanos, Yen T Chen, John D Piette, Amy Bucher, Susan L Murphy\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acr.25612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This review summarizes AI-supported non-pharmacological interventions for adults with chronic rheumatic diseases, detailing their components, purpose, and current evidence base. We searched Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases for studies describing AI-supported interventions for adults with chronic rheumatic diseases. Eligible interventions targeted clinical outcomes (pain, function, disability, fatigue), psychological measures (depression, anxiety), or behavioral outcomes (physical activity, nutrition). All publication types (journal articles, conference abstracts, protocols) published in English language until January 19, 2025, were considered, and interventions of any duration, frequency, country of origin, or setting (inpatient, outpatient, community, and home setting) were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies and one extracted data on study characteristics, intervention components, AI methodologies, and outcomes. Fifteen AI-supported interventions were identified, primarily targeting osteoarthritis (OA) (73%) and focusing on education and exercise advice (67%). The most common AI tool was rule-based expert systems (40%), followed by natural language processing systems (33%) and machine learning algorithms (27%). The interventions ranged from 3 weeks to 12 months, while sample sizes ranged from 7 to 427 participants reflecting huge variability across studies. Most interventions demonstrated high usability, engagement, and adherence. Improvements in exercise compliance, physical activity, and symptoms such as pain and physical function were reported, though effects varied across studies and were sometimes not sustained long-term. AI-supported interventions show promise in promoting education, exercise, and behavioral guidance for adults with chronic rheumatic diseases. There is evidence for high usability and engagement but the clinical impact on long-term symptom management is uncertain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthritis Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthritis Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25612\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25612","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文综述了人工智能支持的成人慢性风湿病非药物干预措施,详细介绍了其成分、目的和目前的证据基础。我们检索了Embase、PubMed、Cochrane和Scopus数据库,寻找描述人工智能支持的成人慢性风湿病干预措施的研究。合格的干预措施针对临床结果(疼痛、功能、残疾、疲劳)、心理测量(抑郁、焦虑)或行为结果(身体活动、营养)。纳入了2025年1月19日前以英语发表的所有出版物类型(期刊文章、会议摘要、方案),并纳入了任何持续时间、频率、原产国或环境(住院、门诊、社区和家庭环境)的干预措施。两名审稿人独立筛选研究,一名审稿人提取研究特征、干预成分、人工智能方法和结果的数据。确定了15种人工智能支持的干预措施,主要针对骨关节炎(73%),重点是教育和运动建议(67%)。最常见的人工智能工具是基于规则的专家系统(40%),其次是自然语言处理系统(33%)和机器学习算法(27%)。干预从3周到12个月不等,而样本量从7到427名参与者不等,反映了研究之间的巨大差异。大多数干预显示出高可用性、参与度和依从性。据报道,运动依从性、身体活动以及疼痛和身体功能等症状有所改善,尽管研究的效果各不相同,有时不能长期持续。人工智能支持的干预措施有望促进成人慢性风湿病患者的教育、锻炼和行为指导。有证据表明高可用性和参与度,但对长期症状管理的临床影响尚不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Scoping Review on AI-Supported Interventions for Non-Pharmacological Management of Chronic Rheumatic Diseases.

This review summarizes AI-supported non-pharmacological interventions for adults with chronic rheumatic diseases, detailing their components, purpose, and current evidence base. We searched Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases for studies describing AI-supported interventions for adults with chronic rheumatic diseases. Eligible interventions targeted clinical outcomes (pain, function, disability, fatigue), psychological measures (depression, anxiety), or behavioral outcomes (physical activity, nutrition). All publication types (journal articles, conference abstracts, protocols) published in English language until January 19, 2025, were considered, and interventions of any duration, frequency, country of origin, or setting (inpatient, outpatient, community, and home setting) were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies and one extracted data on study characteristics, intervention components, AI methodologies, and outcomes. Fifteen AI-supported interventions were identified, primarily targeting osteoarthritis (OA) (73%) and focusing on education and exercise advice (67%). The most common AI tool was rule-based expert systems (40%), followed by natural language processing systems (33%) and machine learning algorithms (27%). The interventions ranged from 3 weeks to 12 months, while sample sizes ranged from 7 to 427 participants reflecting huge variability across studies. Most interventions demonstrated high usability, engagement, and adherence. Improvements in exercise compliance, physical activity, and symptoms such as pain and physical function were reported, though effects varied across studies and were sometimes not sustained long-term. AI-supported interventions show promise in promoting education, exercise, and behavioral guidance for adults with chronic rheumatic diseases. There is evidence for high usability and engagement but the clinical impact on long-term symptom management is uncertain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
368
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信