研究了LA-ICP-MS两相输样中气态碳和颗粒碳的敏感性差异。

IF 3.1 2区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Lukas Brunnbauer, David Ken Gibbs, Detlef Günther and Andreas Limbeck
{"title":"研究了LA-ICP-MS两相输样中气态碳和颗粒碳的敏感性差异。","authors":"Lukas Brunnbauer, David Ken Gibbs, Detlef Günther and Andreas Limbeck","doi":"10.1039/D5JA00172B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >LA-ICP-MS is a widely used analytical technique for elemental analysis of different solid samples, including carbon-based samples. To compensate for matrix-effects and instrumental drifts during analysis, application of an internal standard is recommended. For carbon-based samples, the application of carbon as an internal standard seems reasonable but is typically not recommended due to the so-called two-phase sample transport where ablated carbon is transported both as particulate and gaseous species. The quantitative deviations in the sensitivity of particulate and gaseous carbon have not been accessible so far but would provide useful insights into the application of carbon as an internal standard. More precisely, if similar sensitivity for particulate and gaseous carbon species is found, application as an internal standard would not be restricted. To investigate this, we analyze the two-phase sample transport of carbon upon ablation of 5 different polymers, which all form different ratios of particulate and gaseous carbon species. Amongst the studied materials, it has been observed that 2 samples provide almost exclusive formation of a gas phase. Correlating these observed signals for selected polymers with the ablated mass of carbon allows us to calculate the sensitivity of gaseous carbon species as 13.8 cts per pg. Using a mass balance approach, we estimated the sensitivity of particulate carbon for the 3 other polymers, where we find significant differences in sensitivity ranging from 1.69 cts per pg to 14.06 cts per pg. This indicates that the sensitivity for particulate carbon species is highly dependent on the sample matrix, resulting in sensitivity differences up to a factor of 7. All in all, the findings of this study support the results of carbon being an inadequate choice for an internal standard in LA-ICP-MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":81,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry","volume":" 8","pages":" 2179-2186"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12243101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the sensitivity difference of gaseous and particulate carbon in two-phase sample transport in LA-ICP-MS†\",\"authors\":\"Lukas Brunnbauer, David Ken Gibbs, Detlef Günther and Andreas Limbeck\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D5JA00172B\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >LA-ICP-MS is a widely used analytical technique for elemental analysis of different solid samples, including carbon-based samples. To compensate for matrix-effects and instrumental drifts during analysis, application of an internal standard is recommended. For carbon-based samples, the application of carbon as an internal standard seems reasonable but is typically not recommended due to the so-called two-phase sample transport where ablated carbon is transported both as particulate and gaseous species. The quantitative deviations in the sensitivity of particulate and gaseous carbon have not been accessible so far but would provide useful insights into the application of carbon as an internal standard. More precisely, if similar sensitivity for particulate and gaseous carbon species is found, application as an internal standard would not be restricted. To investigate this, we analyze the two-phase sample transport of carbon upon ablation of 5 different polymers, which all form different ratios of particulate and gaseous carbon species. Amongst the studied materials, it has been observed that 2 samples provide almost exclusive formation of a gas phase. Correlating these observed signals for selected polymers with the ablated mass of carbon allows us to calculate the sensitivity of gaseous carbon species as 13.8 cts per pg. Using a mass balance approach, we estimated the sensitivity of particulate carbon for the 3 other polymers, where we find significant differences in sensitivity ranging from 1.69 cts per pg to 14.06 cts per pg. This indicates that the sensitivity for particulate carbon species is highly dependent on the sample matrix, resulting in sensitivity differences up to a factor of 7. All in all, the findings of this study support the results of carbon being an inadequate choice for an internal standard in LA-ICP-MS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry\",\"volume\":\" 8\",\"pages\":\" 2179-2186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12243101/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ja/d5ja00172b\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ja/d5ja00172b","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

LA-ICP-MS是一种广泛应用于各种固体样品(包括碳基样品)元素分析的分析技术。为了补偿分析过程中的基质效应和仪器漂移,建议使用内部标准。对于碳基样品,碳作为内标的应用似乎是合理的,但通常不推荐,因为所谓的两相样品运输,其中烧蚀的碳以颗粒和气态两种形式运输。迄今为止,颗粒碳和气态碳的灵敏度的定量偏差还无法获得,但将为将碳作为内部标准的应用提供有用的见解。更确切地说,如果发现对颗粒和气态碳种类具有类似的灵敏度,则作为内部标准的应用将不受限制。为了研究这一点,我们分析了5种不同聚合物烧蚀后碳的两相样品输运,它们都形成了不同比例的颗粒碳和气态碳。在所研究的材料中,已观察到2个样品几乎完全形成气相。将所选聚合物的这些观测信号与碳的烧烧质量相关联,使我们能够计算出气态碳物种的灵敏度为13.8 cts / pg。使用质量平衡方法,我们估计了其他3种聚合物的颗粒碳的灵敏度,我们发现灵敏度在1.69 cts / pg到14.06 cts / pg之间存在显著差异。这表明颗粒碳物种的灵敏度高度依赖于样品基质。导致灵敏度差异高达7倍。总而言之,本研究的结果支持了碳作为LA-ICP-MS内标的不适当选择的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Investigating the sensitivity difference of gaseous and particulate carbon in two-phase sample transport in LA-ICP-MS†

Investigating the sensitivity difference of gaseous and particulate carbon in two-phase sample transport in LA-ICP-MS†

LA-ICP-MS is a widely used analytical technique for elemental analysis of different solid samples, including carbon-based samples. To compensate for matrix-effects and instrumental drifts during analysis, application of an internal standard is recommended. For carbon-based samples, the application of carbon as an internal standard seems reasonable but is typically not recommended due to the so-called two-phase sample transport where ablated carbon is transported both as particulate and gaseous species. The quantitative deviations in the sensitivity of particulate and gaseous carbon have not been accessible so far but would provide useful insights into the application of carbon as an internal standard. More precisely, if similar sensitivity for particulate and gaseous carbon species is found, application as an internal standard would not be restricted. To investigate this, we analyze the two-phase sample transport of carbon upon ablation of 5 different polymers, which all form different ratios of particulate and gaseous carbon species. Amongst the studied materials, it has been observed that 2 samples provide almost exclusive formation of a gas phase. Correlating these observed signals for selected polymers with the ablated mass of carbon allows us to calculate the sensitivity of gaseous carbon species as 13.8 cts per pg. Using a mass balance approach, we estimated the sensitivity of particulate carbon for the 3 other polymers, where we find significant differences in sensitivity ranging from 1.69 cts per pg to 14.06 cts per pg. This indicates that the sensitivity for particulate carbon species is highly dependent on the sample matrix, resulting in sensitivity differences up to a factor of 7. All in all, the findings of this study support the results of carbon being an inadequate choice for an internal standard in LA-ICP-MS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
26.50%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Innovative research on the fundamental theory and application of spectrometric techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信