薄垫层非连体桩-沉箱基础隔震效果:大型振动台试验

IF 5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Zhongwei Li, Guoliang Dai, Eng-Choon Leong, Zhiwei Chen, Hongbo Liu, Wenbo Zhu, Weiming Gong
{"title":"薄垫层非连体桩-沉箱基础隔震效果:大型振动台试验","authors":"Zhongwei Li,&nbsp;Guoliang Dai,&nbsp;Eng-Choon Leong,&nbsp;Zhiwei Chen,&nbsp;Hongbo Liu,&nbsp;Wenbo Zhu,&nbsp;Weiming Gong","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This paper reports the results of large-scale shaking table tests on a novel unconnected piles-caisson foundation (UPCF) with a thin cushion layer for seismic isolation. The tests compared traditional thick-cushion and thin-cushion UPCFs under various seismic intensities and wave types. The results demonstrated that the thin-cushion UPCF significantly outperformed traditional thick-cushion designs, achieving a maximum intensity isolation efficiency of 70.1%. This superior performance was attributed to the free rotation of cushion particles, enabling a larger natural vibration period of the cushion. A new evaluation parameter, intensity isolation efficiency, was introduced, which exhibits greater stability and relevancy than peak isolation efficiency. The study also revealed the impact of cushion material, thickness, and seismic wave characteristics on isolation performance, uncovering a nonlinear correlation between square root of acceleration and isolation efficiency. Additionally, an embedded thin-cushion design effectively reduced structural displacement but partly compromised isolation efficiency, highlighting the need for future research to balance these factors. This research contributes to the development of more effective seismic isolation strategies for bridges and other structures in high-intensity seismic zones.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 10","pages":"2369-2386"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seismic Isolation Effect of Unconnected Piles-Caisson Foundation With Thin Cushion Layer: Large-Scale Shaking Table Tests\",\"authors\":\"Zhongwei Li,&nbsp;Guoliang Dai,&nbsp;Eng-Choon Leong,&nbsp;Zhiwei Chen,&nbsp;Hongbo Liu,&nbsp;Wenbo Zhu,&nbsp;Weiming Gong\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eqe.4367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This paper reports the results of large-scale shaking table tests on a novel unconnected piles-caisson foundation (UPCF) with a thin cushion layer for seismic isolation. The tests compared traditional thick-cushion and thin-cushion UPCFs under various seismic intensities and wave types. The results demonstrated that the thin-cushion UPCF significantly outperformed traditional thick-cushion designs, achieving a maximum intensity isolation efficiency of 70.1%. This superior performance was attributed to the free rotation of cushion particles, enabling a larger natural vibration period of the cushion. A new evaluation parameter, intensity isolation efficiency, was introduced, which exhibits greater stability and relevancy than peak isolation efficiency. The study also revealed the impact of cushion material, thickness, and seismic wave characteristics on isolation performance, uncovering a nonlinear correlation between square root of acceleration and isolation efficiency. Additionally, an embedded thin-cushion design effectively reduced structural displacement but partly compromised isolation efficiency, highlighting the need for future research to balance these factors. This research contributes to the development of more effective seismic isolation strategies for bridges and other structures in high-intensity seismic zones.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics\",\"volume\":\"54 10\",\"pages\":\"2369-2386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4367\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4367","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文报道了一种具有薄隔震垫层的新型无连接桩沉箱基础(UPCF)的大型振动台试验结果。测试比较了传统厚垫和薄垫upcf在不同地震烈度和波型下的性能。结果表明,薄垫UPCF显著优于传统厚垫设计,最大强度隔离效率为70.1%。这种优异的性能归功于缓冲颗粒的自由旋转,使缓冲具有更大的自然振动周期。引入了一个新的评价参数——强度隔离效率,它比峰值隔离效率具有更大的稳定性和相关性。研究还揭示了缓冲材料、厚度和地震波特性对隔震性能的影响,揭示了加速度的平方根与隔震效率之间的非线性相关关系。此外,嵌入式薄垫设计有效地减少了结构位移,但在一定程度上降低了隔震效率,因此需要未来的研究来平衡这些因素。该研究有助于开发更有效的高烈度地震带桥梁和其他结构的隔震策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seismic Isolation Effect of Unconnected Piles-Caisson Foundation With Thin Cushion Layer: Large-Scale Shaking Table Tests

This paper reports the results of large-scale shaking table tests on a novel unconnected piles-caisson foundation (UPCF) with a thin cushion layer for seismic isolation. The tests compared traditional thick-cushion and thin-cushion UPCFs under various seismic intensities and wave types. The results demonstrated that the thin-cushion UPCF significantly outperformed traditional thick-cushion designs, achieving a maximum intensity isolation efficiency of 70.1%. This superior performance was attributed to the free rotation of cushion particles, enabling a larger natural vibration period of the cushion. A new evaluation parameter, intensity isolation efficiency, was introduced, which exhibits greater stability and relevancy than peak isolation efficiency. The study also revealed the impact of cushion material, thickness, and seismic wave characteristics on isolation performance, uncovering a nonlinear correlation between square root of acceleration and isolation efficiency. Additionally, an embedded thin-cushion design effectively reduced structural displacement but partly compromised isolation efficiency, highlighting the need for future research to balance these factors. This research contributes to the development of more effective seismic isolation strategies for bridges and other structures in high-intensity seismic zones.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信