职业治疗主导的环境评估和修改——对区域/农村环境中试点实施研究的定量评估

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Alison Pighills, Susan Melchert, Tessa Brondello, Alicia Eden, Erin Rickman, Anna Tynan
{"title":"职业治疗主导的环境评估和修改——对区域/农村环境中试点实施研究的定量评估","authors":"Alison Pighills,&nbsp;Susan Melchert,&nbsp;Tessa Brondello,&nbsp;Alicia Eden,&nbsp;Erin Rickman,&nbsp;Anna Tynan","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Environmental assessment and modification is an effective fall prevention intervention for high-risk older people, which has not yet been adopted in routine occupational therapy practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A pilot pre-post quantitative implementation study was carried out in a regional hospital and health service, within a community-based occupational therapy service, in Queensland between 2019 and 2022, involving 279 occupational therapy medical chart audits of people aged ≥65 at high risk of falls, clinical practice observations of 9 participating occupational therapists, and 32 staff questionnaires.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Consumer and Community Involvement</h3>\n \n <p>Occupational therapists were included as co-researchers, but there was no health consumer or community involvement in the study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Baseline fall rates were higher than anticipated, with 71% of clients sustaining ≥1 fall in the year preceding intervention and 52% sustaining ≥2 falls. Sixty per cent of people with ≥3 of the 5 identified fall risk factors died during the study period. Implementation outcomes included penetration, fidelity, acceptability, and sustainability.</p>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Penetration</h3>\n \n <p>A fall prevention environmental assessment was provided when indicated in 80% of cases during and immediately after implementation. This increased to 97% 2 years after implementation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Fidelity</h3>\n \n <p>When intervention was indicated, the occupational therapists delivered a high-intensity fall prevention environmental intervention, as per protocol, in 100% of cases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Acceptability</h3>\n \n <p>Staff surveys revealed a marginal, non-statistically significant, increase in staff knowledge, attitude, confidence, and experience in fall prevention between the baseline and follow-up periods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Sustainability</h3>\n \n <p>Medical chart audits revealed that implementation was sustained for 30 months and beyond post implementation.</p>\n </section>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This project demonstrated that environmental assessment and modification was delivered per protocol, embedded in clinical practice, and sustained after implementation. Occupational therapists' precision, in determining who should receive the intervention, increased over time. The results of this pilot will inform the design of a national implementation study, which commenced in 2025.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY</h3>\n \n <p>Checking an older person's home for fall risks can help lower their chances of falling by about 38%, especially if they are more likely to fall. People may be at higher risk because of how they do certain tasks, the tasks themselves, hazards in the environment, health issues, or a mix of these things. An occupational therapist does the assessment by watching the older person do daily tasks, like getting dressed or doing chores. This helps to find out what might cause a fall. The therapist then talks with the person about which activities they feel are most risky, asks for their ideas on how to stay safe, and helps them to make a plan. The therapist also checks in later to help put the plan into action. In this study, we trained therapists to do this kind of fall check. We looked at whether occupational therapists followed the training, if the right people were offered the assessment, and if it was still used after the project ended. We found that therapists did the assessments as they were trained to and with the people who needed them most. The therapists also kept doing the assessments after the project was over. This likely helped reduce falls.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":"72 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1440-1630.70039","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupational therapy-led environmental assessment and modification—A quantitative evaluation of a pilot implementation study in a regional/rural setting\",\"authors\":\"Alison Pighills,&nbsp;Susan Melchert,&nbsp;Tessa Brondello,&nbsp;Alicia Eden,&nbsp;Erin Rickman,&nbsp;Anna Tynan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1440-1630.70039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Environmental assessment and modification is an effective fall prevention intervention for high-risk older people, which has not yet been adopted in routine occupational therapy practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A pilot pre-post quantitative implementation study was carried out in a regional hospital and health service, within a community-based occupational therapy service, in Queensland between 2019 and 2022, involving 279 occupational therapy medical chart audits of people aged ≥65 at high risk of falls, clinical practice observations of 9 participating occupational therapists, and 32 staff questionnaires.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Consumer and Community Involvement</h3>\\n \\n <p>Occupational therapists were included as co-researchers, but there was no health consumer or community involvement in the study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Baseline fall rates were higher than anticipated, with 71% of clients sustaining ≥1 fall in the year preceding intervention and 52% sustaining ≥2 falls. Sixty per cent of people with ≥3 of the 5 identified fall risk factors died during the study period. Implementation outcomes included penetration, fidelity, acceptability, and sustainability.</p>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Penetration</h3>\\n \\n <p>A fall prevention environmental assessment was provided when indicated in 80% of cases during and immediately after implementation. This increased to 97% 2 years after implementation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Fidelity</h3>\\n \\n <p>When intervention was indicated, the occupational therapists delivered a high-intensity fall prevention environmental intervention, as per protocol, in 100% of cases.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Acceptability</h3>\\n \\n <p>Staff surveys revealed a marginal, non-statistically significant, increase in staff knowledge, attitude, confidence, and experience in fall prevention between the baseline and follow-up periods.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Sustainability</h3>\\n \\n <p>Medical chart audits revealed that implementation was sustained for 30 months and beyond post implementation.</p>\\n </section>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This project demonstrated that environmental assessment and modification was delivered per protocol, embedded in clinical practice, and sustained after implementation. Occupational therapists' precision, in determining who should receive the intervention, increased over time. The results of this pilot will inform the design of a national implementation study, which commenced in 2025.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY</h3>\\n \\n <p>Checking an older person's home for fall risks can help lower their chances of falling by about 38%, especially if they are more likely to fall. People may be at higher risk because of how they do certain tasks, the tasks themselves, hazards in the environment, health issues, or a mix of these things. An occupational therapist does the assessment by watching the older person do daily tasks, like getting dressed or doing chores. This helps to find out what might cause a fall. The therapist then talks with the person about which activities they feel are most risky, asks for their ideas on how to stay safe, and helps them to make a plan. The therapist also checks in later to help put the plan into action. In this study, we trained therapists to do this kind of fall check. We looked at whether occupational therapists followed the training, if the right people were offered the assessment, and if it was still used after the project ended. We found that therapists did the assessments as they were trained to and with the people who needed them most. The therapists also kept doing the assessments after the project was over. This likely helped reduce falls.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal\",\"volume\":\"72 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1440-1630.70039\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.70039\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.70039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境评价与改造是一种有效的预防高危老年人跌倒的干预措施,在常规的职业治疗实践中尚未被采用。方法于2019年至2022年在昆士兰州一家地区医院和卫生服务机构开展了一项量化实施前的试点研究,该研究涉及279名年龄≥65岁的跌倒高风险人群的职业治疗医疗图表审计,9名参与职业治疗师的临床实践观察。32份员工问卷。职业治疗师作为共同研究人员,但没有健康消费者或社区参与研究。结果基线跌倒率高于预期,71%的患者在干预前一年跌倒≥1次,52%跌倒≥2次。在研究期间,在5个确定的跌倒危险因素中,有≥3个因素的人死亡的比例为60%。实施结果包括渗透性、保真度、可接受性和可持续性。在实施期间和实施后立即对80%的病例进行了预防跌倒环境评估。实施两年后,这一比例增加到97%。当需要干预时,职业治疗师根据协议对100%的病例进行了高强度的预防跌倒环境干预。工作人员调查显示,在基线和随访期间,工作人员在预防跌倒方面的知识、态度、信心和经验有了边际的、非统计上显著的增加。可持续性医疗图表审计显示,实施后持续了30个月甚至更长时间。结论本项目证明了环境评估和修改是按方案进行的,嵌入临床实践,并在实施后持续进行。随着时间的推移,职业治疗师在决定谁应该接受干预方面的准确性也在提高。这项试验的结果将为2025年开始的一项国家执行研究的设计提供参考。检查老年人的家是否有跌倒风险,可以帮助他们降低约38%的跌倒几率,尤其是如果他们更容易摔倒的话。人们面临更高的风险可能是因为他们完成某些任务的方式,任务本身,环境中的危害,健康问题,或者这些事情的混合。职业治疗师通过观察老年人的日常活动来进行评估,比如穿衣服或做家务。这有助于找出可能导致跌倒的原因。然后治疗师与患者讨论他们认为哪些活动最危险,询问他们关于如何保持安全的想法,并帮助他们制定计划。治疗师也会在稍后进行检查,帮助将计划付诸实施。在这项研究中,我们训练治疗师做这种跌落检查。我们考察了职业治疗师是否遵循了培训,是否有合适的人接受了评估,以及项目结束后是否仍在使用评估。我们发现,治疗师在接受培训时,会与最需要他们的人一起进行评估。在项目结束后,治疗师也继续进行评估。这可能有助于减少跌倒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Occupational therapy-led environmental assessment and modification—A quantitative evaluation of a pilot implementation study in a regional/rural setting

Occupational therapy-led environmental assessment and modification—A quantitative evaluation of a pilot implementation study in a regional/rural setting

Introduction

Environmental assessment and modification is an effective fall prevention intervention for high-risk older people, which has not yet been adopted in routine occupational therapy practice.

Methods

A pilot pre-post quantitative implementation study was carried out in a regional hospital and health service, within a community-based occupational therapy service, in Queensland between 2019 and 2022, involving 279 occupational therapy medical chart audits of people aged ≥65 at high risk of falls, clinical practice observations of 9 participating occupational therapists, and 32 staff questionnaires.

Consumer and Community Involvement

Occupational therapists were included as co-researchers, but there was no health consumer or community involvement in the study.

Results

Baseline fall rates were higher than anticipated, with 71% of clients sustaining ≥1 fall in the year preceding intervention and 52% sustaining ≥2 falls. Sixty per cent of people with ≥3 of the 5 identified fall risk factors died during the study period. Implementation outcomes included penetration, fidelity, acceptability, and sustainability.

Penetration

A fall prevention environmental assessment was provided when indicated in 80% of cases during and immediately after implementation. This increased to 97% 2 years after implementation.

Fidelity

When intervention was indicated, the occupational therapists delivered a high-intensity fall prevention environmental intervention, as per protocol, in 100% of cases.

Acceptability

Staff surveys revealed a marginal, non-statistically significant, increase in staff knowledge, attitude, confidence, and experience in fall prevention between the baseline and follow-up periods.

Sustainability

Medical chart audits revealed that implementation was sustained for 30 months and beyond post implementation.

Conclusion

This project demonstrated that environmental assessment and modification was delivered per protocol, embedded in clinical practice, and sustained after implementation. Occupational therapists' precision, in determining who should receive the intervention, increased over time. The results of this pilot will inform the design of a national implementation study, which commenced in 2025.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Checking an older person's home for fall risks can help lower their chances of falling by about 38%, especially if they are more likely to fall. People may be at higher risk because of how they do certain tasks, the tasks themselves, hazards in the environment, health issues, or a mix of these things. An occupational therapist does the assessment by watching the older person do daily tasks, like getting dressed or doing chores. This helps to find out what might cause a fall. The therapist then talks with the person about which activities they feel are most risky, asks for their ideas on how to stay safe, and helps them to make a plan. The therapist also checks in later to help put the plan into action. In this study, we trained therapists to do this kind of fall check. We looked at whether occupational therapists followed the training, if the right people were offered the assessment, and if it was still used after the project ended. We found that therapists did the assessments as they were trained to and with the people who needed them most. The therapists also kept doing the assessments after the project was over. This likely helped reduce falls.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信