从数量到反应性:推进基于动力学的天然化合物抗氧化测试方法和食品应用

IF 12 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Rajat Suhag, Lucrezia Angeli, Matteo Scampicchio, Giovanna Ferrentino
{"title":"从数量到反应性:推进基于动力学的天然化合物抗氧化测试方法和食品应用","authors":"Rajat Suhag,&nbsp;Lucrezia Angeli,&nbsp;Matteo Scampicchio,&nbsp;Giovanna Ferrentino","doi":"10.1111/1541-4337.70229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Traditional antioxidant testing methods primarily focus on quantifying antioxidant capacity but fail to capture their reactivity and effectiveness over time. Kinetic-based methods provide a deeper understanding of antioxidant performance by assessing reaction rates and inhibition mechanisms. This review discusses the advanced kinetic-based antioxidant testing methods, including the integration of kinetic modeling in traditional assays like 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and oxygen radical absorbance capacity, along with inhibited autoxidation methods based on isothermal calorimetry, oxygen uptake, and differential photocalorimetry (DPC). The principles, advantages, and limitations of these methods are discussed, along with their applications. Additionally, challenges related to instrumentation, standardization, and practical implementation are highlighted. Various kinetic-based antioxidant testing methods have been developed, each with its own set of advantages and limitations. Despite these differences, all these methods share one significant advantage: the ability to provide detailed kinetic information on antioxidant behavior. Continuous monitoring of antioxidant reactivity enables a deeper understanding of how these compounds function in inhibiting oxidation. Furthermore, most of these methods allow testing in real food-based oxidizable substrates, enhancing their relevance for food applications. Although techniques such as oxygen uptake and DPC may be limited by throughput capacity, methods like isothermal calorimetry and oxidizable substrate monitoring offer high-throughput capabilities, making them suitable for large-scale screening. This review presents a range of kinetic-based antioxidant testing methods that can be chosen and applied according to specific experimental requirements and convenience, providing flexibility to address various food-related oxidation challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":155,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","volume":"24 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1541-4337.70229","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Quantity to Reactivity: Advancing Kinetic-Based Antioxidant Testing Methods for Natural Compounds and Food Applications\",\"authors\":\"Rajat Suhag,&nbsp;Lucrezia Angeli,&nbsp;Matteo Scampicchio,&nbsp;Giovanna Ferrentino\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1541-4337.70229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Traditional antioxidant testing methods primarily focus on quantifying antioxidant capacity but fail to capture their reactivity and effectiveness over time. Kinetic-based methods provide a deeper understanding of antioxidant performance by assessing reaction rates and inhibition mechanisms. This review discusses the advanced kinetic-based antioxidant testing methods, including the integration of kinetic modeling in traditional assays like 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and oxygen radical absorbance capacity, along with inhibited autoxidation methods based on isothermal calorimetry, oxygen uptake, and differential photocalorimetry (DPC). The principles, advantages, and limitations of these methods are discussed, along with their applications. Additionally, challenges related to instrumentation, standardization, and practical implementation are highlighted. Various kinetic-based antioxidant testing methods have been developed, each with its own set of advantages and limitations. Despite these differences, all these methods share one significant advantage: the ability to provide detailed kinetic information on antioxidant behavior. Continuous monitoring of antioxidant reactivity enables a deeper understanding of how these compounds function in inhibiting oxidation. Furthermore, most of these methods allow testing in real food-based oxidizable substrates, enhancing their relevance for food applications. Although techniques such as oxygen uptake and DPC may be limited by throughput capacity, methods like isothermal calorimetry and oxidizable substrate monitoring offer high-throughput capabilities, making them suitable for large-scale screening. This review presents a range of kinetic-based antioxidant testing methods that can be chosen and applied according to specific experimental requirements and convenience, providing flexibility to address various food-related oxidation challenges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety\",\"volume\":\"24 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1541-4337.70229\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4337.70229\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4337.70229","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统的抗氧化测试方法主要集中在量化抗氧化能力,但未能捕捉到它们随时间的反应性和有效性。基于动力学的方法通过评估反应速率和抑制机制提供了对抗氧化性能更深入的了解。本文综述了先进的基于动力学的抗氧化测试方法,包括将动力学模型与传统的1,1-二苯基-2-吡啶肼(DPPH)和氧自由基吸收能力等方法相结合,以及基于等温量热法、摄氧量法和微分光量热法(DPC)的抑制自氧化方法。讨论了这些方法的原理、优点和局限性,以及它们的应用。此外,还强调了与仪器、标准化和实际实现相关的挑战。各种基于动力学的抗氧化剂测试方法已经开发出来,每种方法都有自己的一套优点和局限性。尽管存在这些差异,但所有这些方法都有一个显著的优点:能够提供抗氧化行为的详细动力学信息。对抗氧化反应性的持续监测使我们能够更深入地了解这些化合物在抑制氧化中的作用。此外,这些方法中的大多数允许在真正的食品基可氧化底物中进行测试,从而增强了它们与食品应用的相关性。虽然吸氧和DPC等技术可能受到通量能力的限制,但等温量热法和可氧化底物监测等方法提供了高通量能力,使其适合大规模筛选。本文综述了一系列基于动力学的抗氧化剂测试方法,这些方法可以根据特定的实验要求和便利性选择和应用,为解决各种与食品有关的氧化挑战提供了灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

From Quantity to Reactivity: Advancing Kinetic-Based Antioxidant Testing Methods for Natural Compounds and Food Applications

From Quantity to Reactivity: Advancing Kinetic-Based Antioxidant Testing Methods for Natural Compounds and Food Applications

Traditional antioxidant testing methods primarily focus on quantifying antioxidant capacity but fail to capture their reactivity and effectiveness over time. Kinetic-based methods provide a deeper understanding of antioxidant performance by assessing reaction rates and inhibition mechanisms. This review discusses the advanced kinetic-based antioxidant testing methods, including the integration of kinetic modeling in traditional assays like 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and oxygen radical absorbance capacity, along with inhibited autoxidation methods based on isothermal calorimetry, oxygen uptake, and differential photocalorimetry (DPC). The principles, advantages, and limitations of these methods are discussed, along with their applications. Additionally, challenges related to instrumentation, standardization, and practical implementation are highlighted. Various kinetic-based antioxidant testing methods have been developed, each with its own set of advantages and limitations. Despite these differences, all these methods share one significant advantage: the ability to provide detailed kinetic information on antioxidant behavior. Continuous monitoring of antioxidant reactivity enables a deeper understanding of how these compounds function in inhibiting oxidation. Furthermore, most of these methods allow testing in real food-based oxidizable substrates, enhancing their relevance for food applications. Although techniques such as oxygen uptake and DPC may be limited by throughput capacity, methods like isothermal calorimetry and oxidizable substrate monitoring offer high-throughput capabilities, making them suitable for large-scale screening. This review presents a range of kinetic-based antioxidant testing methods that can be chosen and applied according to specific experimental requirements and convenience, providing flexibility to address various food-related oxidation challenges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
26.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (CRFSFS) is an online peer-reviewed journal established in 2002. It aims to provide scientists with unique and comprehensive reviews covering various aspects of food science and technology. CRFSFS publishes in-depth reviews addressing the chemical, microbiological, physical, sensory, and nutritional properties of foods, as well as food processing, engineering, analytical methods, and packaging. Manuscripts should contribute new insights and recommendations to the scientific knowledge on the topic. The journal prioritizes recent developments and encourages critical assessment of experimental design and interpretation of results. Topics related to food safety, such as preventive controls, ingredient contaminants, storage, food authenticity, and adulteration, are considered. Reviews on food hazards must demonstrate validity and reliability in real food systems, not just in model systems. Additionally, reviews on nutritional properties should provide a realistic perspective on how foods influence health, considering processing and storage effects on bioactivity. The journal also accepts reviews on consumer behavior, risk assessment, food regulations, and post-harvest physiology. Authors are encouraged to consult the Editor in Chief before submission to ensure topic suitability. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on analytical and sensory methods, quality control, and food safety approaches are welcomed, with authors advised to follow IFIS Good review practice guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信