Mie Sedoc Jørgensen, Stine Steen Høgenhaug, Carla Sharp, Sune Bo
{"title":"边缘型人格障碍的心理治疗:科学进展与未来方向","authors":"Mie Sedoc Jørgensen, Stine Steen Høgenhaug, Carla Sharp, Sune Bo","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Mentalization-based therapy (MBT) is an evidence-based treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD) and the second most studied psychotherapeutic intervention for this disorder. Despite its growing prominence, there is a lack of focused reviews summarizing the evidence base from randomized clinical trials (RCTs). This review aims to address this gap and highlight directions for future research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This narrative review synthesizes findings from RCTs evaluating MBT for BPD. Building on the seven studies identified in the Cochrane review by Storebø et al. (2020), we conducted an updated search to incorporate RCTs published to 1st April 2025, expanding the evidence base to 14 trials. Eligible studies were assessed for effectiveness outcomes and methodological quality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>While some trials report improvements in BPD symptoms and interpersonal functioning, significant limitations exist. Research has largely focused on symptom reduction, despite concerns about the validity of categorical PD diagnoses. The trials were predominantly conducted in European settings, involving primarily female participants, and did not sufficiently account for BPD severity, comorbidities, or developmental stages. All identified RCTs were at high risk of bias, with significant issues involving attention, attrition, and allegiance bias.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>MBT shows promise, but methodological shortcomings and limited generalizability constrain its evidence base. Future research should prioritize rigorously designed trials with diverse samples, assess core personality dysfunction using dimensional models, and explore adaptations for adolescents, older adults, and comorbid mental disorders to improve and broaden the clinical utility of MBT for BPD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mentalization-Based Therapy for Borderline Personality Disorder: State-Of-The-Science and Future Directions\",\"authors\":\"Mie Sedoc Jørgensen, Stine Steen Høgenhaug, Carla Sharp, Sune Bo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpp.70120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Mentalization-based therapy (MBT) is an evidence-based treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD) and the second most studied psychotherapeutic intervention for this disorder. Despite its growing prominence, there is a lack of focused reviews summarizing the evidence base from randomized clinical trials (RCTs). This review aims to address this gap and highlight directions for future research.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This narrative review synthesizes findings from RCTs evaluating MBT for BPD. Building on the seven studies identified in the Cochrane review by Storebø et al. (2020), we conducted an updated search to incorporate RCTs published to 1st April 2025, expanding the evidence base to 14 trials. Eligible studies were assessed for effectiveness outcomes and methodological quality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>While some trials report improvements in BPD symptoms and interpersonal functioning, significant limitations exist. Research has largely focused on symptom reduction, despite concerns about the validity of categorical PD diagnoses. The trials were predominantly conducted in European settings, involving primarily female participants, and did not sufficiently account for BPD severity, comorbidities, or developmental stages. All identified RCTs were at high risk of bias, with significant issues involving attention, attrition, and allegiance bias.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>MBT shows promise, but methodological shortcomings and limited generalizability constrain its evidence base. Future research should prioritize rigorously designed trials with diverse samples, assess core personality dysfunction using dimensional models, and explore adaptations for adolescents, older adults, and comorbid mental disorders to improve and broaden the clinical utility of MBT for BPD.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70120\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
基于心理的治疗(MBT)是一种基于证据的边缘型人格障碍(BPD)治疗方法,也是该疾病研究第二多的心理治疗干预方法。尽管其日益突出,但缺乏集中总结随机临床试验(rct)证据基础的综述。本文旨在弥补这一空白,并指出未来的研究方向。方法综合评价MBT治疗BPD的随机对照试验结果。在storeboø et al.(2020)在Cochrane综述中确定的7项研究的基础上,我们进行了一次更新的搜索,纳入了截至2025年4月1日发表的随机对照试验,将证据基础扩大到14项试验。评估符合条件的研究的有效性、结果和方法学质量。结果虽然一些试验报告了BPD症状和人际功能的改善,但存在明显的局限性。尽管对PD分类诊断的有效性存在担忧,但研究主要集中在症状减轻上。这些试验主要在欧洲进行,主要涉及女性参与者,并且没有充分考虑BPD的严重程度、合并症或发展阶段。所有确定的随机对照试验均存在高偏倚风险,主要涉及注意偏倚、流失偏倚和忠诚偏倚。结论MBT具有良好的应用前景,但方法上的缺陷和有限的可推广性限制了其证据基础。未来的研究应优先考虑不同样本的严格设计试验,使用维度模型评估核心人格功能障碍,并探索青少年、老年人和共病精神障碍的适应性,以改善和扩大MBT治疗BPD的临床应用。
Mentalization-Based Therapy for Borderline Personality Disorder: State-Of-The-Science and Future Directions
Introduction
Mentalization-based therapy (MBT) is an evidence-based treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD) and the second most studied psychotherapeutic intervention for this disorder. Despite its growing prominence, there is a lack of focused reviews summarizing the evidence base from randomized clinical trials (RCTs). This review aims to address this gap and highlight directions for future research.
Methods
This narrative review synthesizes findings from RCTs evaluating MBT for BPD. Building on the seven studies identified in the Cochrane review by Storebø et al. (2020), we conducted an updated search to incorporate RCTs published to 1st April 2025, expanding the evidence base to 14 trials. Eligible studies were assessed for effectiveness outcomes and methodological quality.
Results
While some trials report improvements in BPD symptoms and interpersonal functioning, significant limitations exist. Research has largely focused on symptom reduction, despite concerns about the validity of categorical PD diagnoses. The trials were predominantly conducted in European settings, involving primarily female participants, and did not sufficiently account for BPD severity, comorbidities, or developmental stages. All identified RCTs were at high risk of bias, with significant issues involving attention, attrition, and allegiance bias.
Conclusions
MBT shows promise, but methodological shortcomings and limited generalizability constrain its evidence base. Future research should prioritize rigorously designed trials with diverse samples, assess core personality dysfunction using dimensional models, and explore adaptations for adolescents, older adults, and comorbid mental disorders to improve and broaden the clinical utility of MBT for BPD.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.