边缘型人格障碍的心理治疗:科学进展与未来方向

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Mie Sedoc Jørgensen, Stine Steen Høgenhaug, Carla Sharp, Sune Bo
{"title":"边缘型人格障碍的心理治疗:科学进展与未来方向","authors":"Mie Sedoc Jørgensen,&nbsp;Stine Steen Høgenhaug,&nbsp;Carla Sharp,&nbsp;Sune Bo","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Mentalization-based therapy (MBT) is an evidence-based treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD) and the second most studied psychotherapeutic intervention for this disorder. Despite its growing prominence, there is a lack of focused reviews summarizing the evidence base from randomized clinical trials (RCTs). This review aims to address this gap and highlight directions for future research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This narrative review synthesizes findings from RCTs evaluating MBT for BPD. Building on the seven studies identified in the Cochrane review by Storebø et al. (2020), we conducted an updated search to incorporate RCTs published to 1st April 2025, expanding the evidence base to 14 trials. Eligible studies were assessed for effectiveness outcomes and methodological quality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>While some trials report improvements in BPD symptoms and interpersonal functioning, significant limitations exist. Research has largely focused on symptom reduction, despite concerns about the validity of categorical PD diagnoses. The trials were predominantly conducted in European settings, involving primarily female participants, and did not sufficiently account for BPD severity, comorbidities, or developmental stages. All identified RCTs were at high risk of bias, with significant issues involving attention, attrition, and allegiance bias.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>MBT shows promise, but methodological shortcomings and limited generalizability constrain its evidence base. Future research should prioritize rigorously designed trials with diverse samples, assess core personality dysfunction using dimensional models, and explore adaptations for adolescents, older adults, and comorbid mental disorders to improve and broaden the clinical utility of MBT for BPD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mentalization-Based Therapy for Borderline Personality Disorder: State-Of-The-Science and Future Directions\",\"authors\":\"Mie Sedoc Jørgensen,&nbsp;Stine Steen Høgenhaug,&nbsp;Carla Sharp,&nbsp;Sune Bo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpp.70120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Mentalization-based therapy (MBT) is an evidence-based treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD) and the second most studied psychotherapeutic intervention for this disorder. Despite its growing prominence, there is a lack of focused reviews summarizing the evidence base from randomized clinical trials (RCTs). This review aims to address this gap and highlight directions for future research.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This narrative review synthesizes findings from RCTs evaluating MBT for BPD. Building on the seven studies identified in the Cochrane review by Storebø et al. (2020), we conducted an updated search to incorporate RCTs published to 1st April 2025, expanding the evidence base to 14 trials. Eligible studies were assessed for effectiveness outcomes and methodological quality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>While some trials report improvements in BPD symptoms and interpersonal functioning, significant limitations exist. Research has largely focused on symptom reduction, despite concerns about the validity of categorical PD diagnoses. The trials were predominantly conducted in European settings, involving primarily female participants, and did not sufficiently account for BPD severity, comorbidities, or developmental stages. All identified RCTs were at high risk of bias, with significant issues involving attention, attrition, and allegiance bias.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>MBT shows promise, but methodological shortcomings and limited generalizability constrain its evidence base. Future research should prioritize rigorously designed trials with diverse samples, assess core personality dysfunction using dimensional models, and explore adaptations for adolescents, older adults, and comorbid mental disorders to improve and broaden the clinical utility of MBT for BPD.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70120\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于心理的治疗(MBT)是一种基于证据的边缘型人格障碍(BPD)治疗方法,也是该疾病研究第二多的心理治疗干预方法。尽管其日益突出,但缺乏集中总结随机临床试验(rct)证据基础的综述。本文旨在弥补这一空白,并指出未来的研究方向。方法综合评价MBT治疗BPD的随机对照试验结果。在storeboø et al.(2020)在Cochrane综述中确定的7项研究的基础上,我们进行了一次更新的搜索,纳入了截至2025年4月1日发表的随机对照试验,将证据基础扩大到14项试验。评估符合条件的研究的有效性、结果和方法学质量。结果虽然一些试验报告了BPD症状和人际功能的改善,但存在明显的局限性。尽管对PD分类诊断的有效性存在担忧,但研究主要集中在症状减轻上。这些试验主要在欧洲进行,主要涉及女性参与者,并且没有充分考虑BPD的严重程度、合并症或发展阶段。所有确定的随机对照试验均存在高偏倚风险,主要涉及注意偏倚、流失偏倚和忠诚偏倚。结论MBT具有良好的应用前景,但方法上的缺陷和有限的可推广性限制了其证据基础。未来的研究应优先考虑不同样本的严格设计试验,使用维度模型评估核心人格功能障碍,并探索青少年、老年人和共病精神障碍的适应性,以改善和扩大MBT治疗BPD的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mentalization-Based Therapy for Borderline Personality Disorder: State-Of-The-Science and Future Directions

Introduction

Mentalization-based therapy (MBT) is an evidence-based treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD) and the second most studied psychotherapeutic intervention for this disorder. Despite its growing prominence, there is a lack of focused reviews summarizing the evidence base from randomized clinical trials (RCTs). This review aims to address this gap and highlight directions for future research.

Methods

This narrative review synthesizes findings from RCTs evaluating MBT for BPD. Building on the seven studies identified in the Cochrane review by Storebø et al. (2020), we conducted an updated search to incorporate RCTs published to 1st April 2025, expanding the evidence base to 14 trials. Eligible studies were assessed for effectiveness outcomes and methodological quality.

Results

While some trials report improvements in BPD symptoms and interpersonal functioning, significant limitations exist. Research has largely focused on symptom reduction, despite concerns about the validity of categorical PD diagnoses. The trials were predominantly conducted in European settings, involving primarily female participants, and did not sufficiently account for BPD severity, comorbidities, or developmental stages. All identified RCTs were at high risk of bias, with significant issues involving attention, attrition, and allegiance bias.

Conclusions

MBT shows promise, but methodological shortcomings and limited generalizability constrain its evidence base. Future research should prioritize rigorously designed trials with diverse samples, assess core personality dysfunction using dimensional models, and explore adaptations for adolescents, older adults, and comorbid mental disorders to improve and broaden the clinical utility of MBT for BPD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信