解读家庭能源转型中可持续发展目标的协同效应:全球知识网络分析

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Xiaoxu An , Niu Dang , Fazi Zhang , Yinan Li , Yongshun Xie , Qiang Wang
{"title":"解读家庭能源转型中可持续发展目标的协同效应:全球知识网络分析","authors":"Xiaoxu An ,&nbsp;Niu Dang ,&nbsp;Fazi Zhang ,&nbsp;Yinan Li ,&nbsp;Yongshun Xie ,&nbsp;Qiang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Within the dual imperatives of climate change mitigation and attaining Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), household energy consumption emerges as a critical nexus connecting micro-level lifestyle demands with macro-level economic, social and environmental systems, warranting in-depth exploration of its multi-objective synergistic governance value. Addressing the prevalent single-goal orientation in research, this investigation integrated 2685 documents from the Web of Science database, spanning from 1998 to 2024 as data sources, within the framework of the United Nations 2030 Agenda. Utilizing systematic literature review, bibliometric and textual analysis techniques, it systematically mapped household energy consumption 's linkage network with the SDGs, identified research hotspots and weak links, uncovered multi-dimensional interaction patterns and constructed a governance framework. Results indicated rapid global research development, but significant geographical imbalance, hampering global governance programs formation. As sustainable development levels improved, research hotspots shifted from the single topic to the societal-environmental synergistic governance. Co-occurrence network analysis identified 11 linked SDGs. Among them, SDG1, SDG7, SDG11, SDG13, and SDG16 constituted the core of highly synergistic research, while the synergy between SDG5 and SDG8 remained underdeveloped. Overall, by pioneering knowledge network analysis of global household energy studies, this research deciphered its intrinsic logical interconnections with the SDGs, bridging the theoretical gap in multi-objective synergistic governance for sustainable household energy consumption, and providing support for resolving trade-off dilemmas among SDGs, and offering a guiding framework for future assessment and quantification of the impact of household energy consumption on the SDGs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 116069"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decoding the synergies of sustainable development goals in household energy transitions: A global knowledge network analysis\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoxu An ,&nbsp;Niu Dang ,&nbsp;Fazi Zhang ,&nbsp;Yinan Li ,&nbsp;Yongshun Xie ,&nbsp;Qiang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Within the dual imperatives of climate change mitigation and attaining Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), household energy consumption emerges as a critical nexus connecting micro-level lifestyle demands with macro-level economic, social and environmental systems, warranting in-depth exploration of its multi-objective synergistic governance value. Addressing the prevalent single-goal orientation in research, this investigation integrated 2685 documents from the Web of Science database, spanning from 1998 to 2024 as data sources, within the framework of the United Nations 2030 Agenda. Utilizing systematic literature review, bibliometric and textual analysis techniques, it systematically mapped household energy consumption 's linkage network with the SDGs, identified research hotspots and weak links, uncovered multi-dimensional interaction patterns and constructed a governance framework. Results indicated rapid global research development, but significant geographical imbalance, hampering global governance programs formation. As sustainable development levels improved, research hotspots shifted from the single topic to the societal-environmental synergistic governance. Co-occurrence network analysis identified 11 linked SDGs. Among them, SDG1, SDG7, SDG11, SDG13, and SDG16 constituted the core of highly synergistic research, while the synergy between SDG5 and SDG8 remained underdeveloped. Overall, by pioneering knowledge network analysis of global household energy studies, this research deciphered its intrinsic logical interconnections with the SDGs, bridging the theoretical gap in multi-objective synergistic governance for sustainable household energy consumption, and providing support for resolving trade-off dilemmas among SDGs, and offering a guiding framework for future assessment and quantification of the impact of household energy consumption on the SDGs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"224 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116069\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125007427\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125007427","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在减缓气候变化和实现可持续发展目标的双重要求下,家庭能源消费成为连接微观生活方式需求与宏观经济、社会和环境系统的关键纽带,需要深入探索其多目标协同治理价值。为了解决研究中普遍存在的单一目标导向问题,本调查在联合国2030年议程框架内整合了1998年至2024年期间Web of Science数据库中的2685份文件作为数据源。运用系统文献综述、文献计量学和文本分析等技术,系统绘制家庭能源消费与可持续发展目标的联动网络,识别研究热点和薄弱环节,揭示多维互动模式,构建治理框架。研究结果表明,全球研究发展迅速,但地域失衡严重,阻碍了全球治理方案的形成。随着可持续发展水平的提高,研究热点从单一主题转向社会-环境协同治理。共现网络分析确定了11个相关的可持续发展目标。其中,SDG1、SDG7、SDG11、SDG13、SDG16构成了协同性较强的研究核心,而SDG5与SDG8之间的协同性尚不充分。总体而言,本研究通过开创性的全球家庭能源研究知识网络分析,解读了其与可持续发展目标内在的逻辑联系,弥补了家庭可持续能源消费多目标协同治理的理论空白,为解决可持续发展目标之间的权衡困境提供了支持,为未来家庭能源消费对可持续发展目标影响的评估和量化提供了指导框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decoding the synergies of sustainable development goals in household energy transitions: A global knowledge network analysis
Within the dual imperatives of climate change mitigation and attaining Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), household energy consumption emerges as a critical nexus connecting micro-level lifestyle demands with macro-level economic, social and environmental systems, warranting in-depth exploration of its multi-objective synergistic governance value. Addressing the prevalent single-goal orientation in research, this investigation integrated 2685 documents from the Web of Science database, spanning from 1998 to 2024 as data sources, within the framework of the United Nations 2030 Agenda. Utilizing systematic literature review, bibliometric and textual analysis techniques, it systematically mapped household energy consumption 's linkage network with the SDGs, identified research hotspots and weak links, uncovered multi-dimensional interaction patterns and constructed a governance framework. Results indicated rapid global research development, but significant geographical imbalance, hampering global governance programs formation. As sustainable development levels improved, research hotspots shifted from the single topic to the societal-environmental synergistic governance. Co-occurrence network analysis identified 11 linked SDGs. Among them, SDG1, SDG7, SDG11, SDG13, and SDG16 constituted the core of highly synergistic research, while the synergy between SDG5 and SDG8 remained underdeveloped. Overall, by pioneering knowledge network analysis of global household energy studies, this research deciphered its intrinsic logical interconnections with the SDGs, bridging the theoretical gap in multi-objective synergistic governance for sustainable household energy consumption, and providing support for resolving trade-off dilemmas among SDGs, and offering a guiding framework for future assessment and quantification of the impact of household energy consumption on the SDGs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信