暴露于亚致死浓度杀虫剂对成年双翅蚜蝇迁移和觅食行为的影响

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Demeter Lorentha S. Gidari, Nickolas G. Kavallieratos, Maria C. Boukouvala
{"title":"暴露于亚致死浓度杀虫剂对成年双翅蚜蝇迁移和觅食行为的影响","authors":"Demeter Lorentha S. Gidari,&nbsp;Nickolas G. Kavallieratos,&nbsp;Maria C. Boukouvala","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Various pyrethroids and neonicotinoids have been evaluated against <em>Alphitobius diaperinus</em>. However, deltamethrin and a mixture of acetamiprid, d-tetramethrin, and piperonyl butoxide (d.a.p.) have never been examined for sublethal effects on <em>A. diaperinus</em> locomotion. Thus, the present study evaluated the impact of their LC<sub>10</sub> and LC<sub>30</sub> in the mobility traits of <em>A. diaperinus</em> adults (30 individuals/treatment), in the absence and presence of food source, after 8, 12, 24, and 48 h of exposure. Deltamethrin was more toxic compared to d.a.p. ANOVA revealed significant disruptions in locomotion, including increased immobility, reduced walking speed, and diminished climbing ability, especially with the LC<sub>30</sub> of deltamethrin, compared to the control group. The longest walking period was observed with the 12-h control group (609.5 s) vs. LC<sub>10</sub> and LC<sub>30</sub> of deltamethrin (235.3 and 300.2 s, respectively) and LC<sub>10</sub> and LC<sub>30</sub> of d.a.p. (456.1 and 481.7 s, respectively). Walking speed in the control groups was &gt;46.0 mm/s while decreased to 7.9 and 8.8 mm/s after 48 h of exposure to the LC<sub>30</sub> of deltamethrin and d.a.p., respectively. Negative effects were noted for the mobility of <em>A. diaperinus</em> in the presence of food source. Control group individuals stayed in the food for &gt;174 s while the insecticides-treated individuals for &lt;86 s at 12, 24, and 48 h of exposure. Both insecticides negatively influenced the mobility behavior in the presence and absence of food source and the walking speed. These findings underscore the potential of considering sublethal concentrations of insecticides in integrated pest management strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107327"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disruptions of mobility and foraging behavior of Alphitobius diaperinus adults exposed to sublethal insecticidal concentrations\",\"authors\":\"Demeter Lorentha S. Gidari,&nbsp;Nickolas G. Kavallieratos,&nbsp;Maria C. Boukouvala\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Various pyrethroids and neonicotinoids have been evaluated against <em>Alphitobius diaperinus</em>. However, deltamethrin and a mixture of acetamiprid, d-tetramethrin, and piperonyl butoxide (d.a.p.) have never been examined for sublethal effects on <em>A. diaperinus</em> locomotion. Thus, the present study evaluated the impact of their LC<sub>10</sub> and LC<sub>30</sub> in the mobility traits of <em>A. diaperinus</em> adults (30 individuals/treatment), in the absence and presence of food source, after 8, 12, 24, and 48 h of exposure. Deltamethrin was more toxic compared to d.a.p. ANOVA revealed significant disruptions in locomotion, including increased immobility, reduced walking speed, and diminished climbing ability, especially with the LC<sub>30</sub> of deltamethrin, compared to the control group. The longest walking period was observed with the 12-h control group (609.5 s) vs. LC<sub>10</sub> and LC<sub>30</sub> of deltamethrin (235.3 and 300.2 s, respectively) and LC<sub>10</sub> and LC<sub>30</sub> of d.a.p. (456.1 and 481.7 s, respectively). Walking speed in the control groups was &gt;46.0 mm/s while decreased to 7.9 and 8.8 mm/s after 48 h of exposure to the LC<sub>30</sub> of deltamethrin and d.a.p., respectively. Negative effects were noted for the mobility of <em>A. diaperinus</em> in the presence of food source. Control group individuals stayed in the food for &gt;174 s while the insecticides-treated individuals for &lt;86 s at 12, 24, and 48 h of exposure. Both insecticides negatively influenced the mobility behavior in the presence and absence of food source and the walking speed. These findings underscore the potential of considering sublethal concentrations of insecticides in integrated pest management strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crop Protection\",\"volume\":\"197 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crop Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425002194\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425002194","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

各种拟除虫菊酯和新烟碱类杀虫剂已被评价用于防治尿纹蚜。然而,溴氰菊酯和啶虫脒、d-胺菊酯和胡椒酰丁醇的混合物(d.a.p.)从未被检测过对尿蝇运动的亚致死效应。因此,本研究评估了它们的LC10和LC30在无食物源和有食物源的情况下,暴露8、12、24和48小时后对平腹依蚊成虫(30只/处理)流动性性状的影响。与d.a.p相比,溴氰菊酯的毒性更大。方差分析显示,与对照组相比,溴氰菊酯的LC30显著破坏了小鼠的运动能力,包括不动能力增加、行走速度减慢和攀爬能力下降,尤其是溴氰菊酯的LC30。行走时间最长的是12 h对照组(609.5 s),而溴氰菊酯的LC10和LC30分别为235.3和300.2 s, d.a.p的LC10和LC30分别为456.1和481.7 s。对照组的步行速度为46.0 mm/s,暴露于溴氰菊酯LC30 48 h后分别降至7.9和8.8 mm/s。在有食物源存在的情况下,对尿纹依蚊的移动性有负面影响。在暴露12、24和48 h时,对照组个体在食物中停留174 s,杀虫剂处理个体在食物中停留86 s。两种杀虫剂对有、无食物源时的移动行为和行走速度均有负向影响。这些发现强调了在害虫综合管理战略中考虑杀虫剂亚致死浓度的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Disruptions of mobility and foraging behavior of Alphitobius diaperinus adults exposed to sublethal insecticidal concentrations

Disruptions of mobility and foraging behavior of Alphitobius diaperinus adults exposed to sublethal insecticidal concentrations
Various pyrethroids and neonicotinoids have been evaluated against Alphitobius diaperinus. However, deltamethrin and a mixture of acetamiprid, d-tetramethrin, and piperonyl butoxide (d.a.p.) have never been examined for sublethal effects on A. diaperinus locomotion. Thus, the present study evaluated the impact of their LC10 and LC30 in the mobility traits of A. diaperinus adults (30 individuals/treatment), in the absence and presence of food source, after 8, 12, 24, and 48 h of exposure. Deltamethrin was more toxic compared to d.a.p. ANOVA revealed significant disruptions in locomotion, including increased immobility, reduced walking speed, and diminished climbing ability, especially with the LC30 of deltamethrin, compared to the control group. The longest walking period was observed with the 12-h control group (609.5 s) vs. LC10 and LC30 of deltamethrin (235.3 and 300.2 s, respectively) and LC10 and LC30 of d.a.p. (456.1 and 481.7 s, respectively). Walking speed in the control groups was >46.0 mm/s while decreased to 7.9 and 8.8 mm/s after 48 h of exposure to the LC30 of deltamethrin and d.a.p., respectively. Negative effects were noted for the mobility of A. diaperinus in the presence of food source. Control group individuals stayed in the food for >174 s while the insecticides-treated individuals for <86 s at 12, 24, and 48 h of exposure. Both insecticides negatively influenced the mobility behavior in the presence and absence of food source and the walking speed. These findings underscore the potential of considering sublethal concentrations of insecticides in integrated pest management strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Crop Protection
Crop Protection 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
200
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics: -Abiotic damage- Agronomic control methods- Assessment of pest and disease damage- Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases- Biological control- Biorational pesticides- Control of animal pests of world crops- Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms- Control of weeds and integrated management- Economic considerations- Effects of plant growth regulators- Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use- Environmental effects of pesticides- Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control- GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications- Importance and control of postharvest crop losses- Integrated control- Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies- Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection- Pesticide application methods- Pest management- Phytobiomes for pest and disease control- Resistance management- Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信