用牡丹作为诱捕作物治理柑橘蚜和黄龙冰的可行性研究

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Wellington Ivo Eduardo, Juan Camilo Cifuentes-Arenas, Eduardo Cassettari Monteferrante, Sílvio Aparecido Lopes, Renato Beozzo Bassanezi, Haroldo Xavier Linhares Volpe, Andréia Cristina de Oliveira Adami, Sílvia Helena Galvão de Miranda, João Roberto Spotti Lopes, Leandro Peña, Marcelo Pedreira de Miranda
{"title":"用牡丹作为诱捕作物治理柑橘蚜和黄龙冰的可行性研究","authors":"Wellington Ivo Eduardo, Juan Camilo Cifuentes-Arenas, Eduardo Cassettari Monteferrante, Sílvio Aparecido Lopes, Renato Beozzo Bassanezi, Haroldo Xavier Linhares Volpe, Andréia Cristina de Oliveira Adami, Sílvia Helena Galvão de Miranda, João Roberto Spotti Lopes, Leandro Peña, Marcelo Pedreira de Miranda","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trap cropping is a sustainable control method aimed at reducing pest insect populations in main crops. In this study, the effect of insecticide-treated <ce:italic>Murraya paniculata</ce:italic> as a trap crop to reduce <ce:italic>Diaphorina citri</ce:italic> populations and huanglongbing (HLB) incidence was evaluated in a large area of a commercial citrus orchard. Additionally, the economic viability of this tactic and the flushing pattern and synchrony of <ce:italic>M. paniculata</ce:italic> and sweet orange trees were assessed. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design, with four blocks (4.5 ha each) located at the orchard border. Each block contained two treatments: 1) <ce:italic>M. paniculata</ce:italic> trap crop treated with insecticides (with trap crop) and 2) absence of <ce:italic>M. paniculata</ce:italic> trap crop (without trap crop). The average psyllid population and cumulative HLB incidence in the plots with trap crop (0.1 psyllids/yellow stick card/fortnight and 2.1% symptomatic trees) were ≈31% lower than in plots without trap crop (0.14 psyllids/yellow stick card/fortnight and 3.1% symptomatic trees). The number of new shoots/branch was higher in <ce:italic>M. paniculata</ce:italic> than in citrus trees in 83% of the assessment dates. The trap crop tactic becomes viable when HLB incidence exceeds 4.5% for orchards with trees younger than three years, and 17.1% for orchards with trees between three and 5.5 years of age. Therefore, this study confirms that <ce:italic>M. paniculata</ce:italic> can be used as a trap crop for managing <ce:italic>D. citri</ce:italic> and HLB; however, its economic viability depends on disease incidence.","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Viability of using Murraya paniculata as a trap crop to manage Diaphorina citri and huanglongbing in citrus\",\"authors\":\"Wellington Ivo Eduardo, Juan Camilo Cifuentes-Arenas, Eduardo Cassettari Monteferrante, Sílvio Aparecido Lopes, Renato Beozzo Bassanezi, Haroldo Xavier Linhares Volpe, Andréia Cristina de Oliveira Adami, Sílvia Helena Galvão de Miranda, João Roberto Spotti Lopes, Leandro Peña, Marcelo Pedreira de Miranda\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Trap cropping is a sustainable control method aimed at reducing pest insect populations in main crops. In this study, the effect of insecticide-treated <ce:italic>Murraya paniculata</ce:italic> as a trap crop to reduce <ce:italic>Diaphorina citri</ce:italic> populations and huanglongbing (HLB) incidence was evaluated in a large area of a commercial citrus orchard. Additionally, the economic viability of this tactic and the flushing pattern and synchrony of <ce:italic>M. paniculata</ce:italic> and sweet orange trees were assessed. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design, with four blocks (4.5 ha each) located at the orchard border. Each block contained two treatments: 1) <ce:italic>M. paniculata</ce:italic> trap crop treated with insecticides (with trap crop) and 2) absence of <ce:italic>M. paniculata</ce:italic> trap crop (without trap crop). The average psyllid population and cumulative HLB incidence in the plots with trap crop (0.1 psyllids/yellow stick card/fortnight and 2.1% symptomatic trees) were ≈31% lower than in plots without trap crop (0.14 psyllids/yellow stick card/fortnight and 3.1% symptomatic trees). The number of new shoots/branch was higher in <ce:italic>M. paniculata</ce:italic> than in citrus trees in 83% of the assessment dates. The trap crop tactic becomes viable when HLB incidence exceeds 4.5% for orchards with trees younger than three years, and 17.1% for orchards with trees between three and 5.5 years of age. Therefore, this study confirms that <ce:italic>M. paniculata</ce:italic> can be used as a trap crop for managing <ce:italic>D. citri</ce:italic> and HLB; however, its economic viability depends on disease incidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crop Protection\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crop Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107333\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107333","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

陷阱种植是一种旨在减少主要作物害虫数量的可持续控制方法。本研究在一个大面积的柑桔商业果园中,评价了经杀虫剂处理的板栗作为诱捕作物对柑桔粉虱种群和黄龙病发病率的影响。此外,还评估了该策略的经济可行性,以及甜橙树和甜橙树的潮红模式和同步性。实验采用随机地块设计,在果园边界设置四个地块(每个地块4.5公顷)。每个区块包含2个处理:1)有杀虫剂处理(有诱捕作物)和2)无诱捕作物(没有诱捕作物)。陷阱作物区木虱平均种群数和累积HLB发病率(0.1只木虱/黄棍卡/两周,2.1%有症状树)比没有陷阱作物区(0.14只木虱/黄棍卡/两周,3.1%有症状树)低约31%。在83%的评估日期中,新梢/枝数均高于柑橘树。当树龄小于3年的果园HLB发病率超过4.5%,树龄在3 - 5.5年的果园HLB发病率超过17.1%时,陷阱作物策略是可行的。因此,本研究证实,金针叶可以作为柑橘和大戟叶枯病的诱捕作物;然而,其经济可行性取决于疾病发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Viability of using Murraya paniculata as a trap crop to manage Diaphorina citri and huanglongbing in citrus
Trap cropping is a sustainable control method aimed at reducing pest insect populations in main crops. In this study, the effect of insecticide-treated Murraya paniculata as a trap crop to reduce Diaphorina citri populations and huanglongbing (HLB) incidence was evaluated in a large area of a commercial citrus orchard. Additionally, the economic viability of this tactic and the flushing pattern and synchrony of M. paniculata and sweet orange trees were assessed. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design, with four blocks (4.5 ha each) located at the orchard border. Each block contained two treatments: 1) M. paniculata trap crop treated with insecticides (with trap crop) and 2) absence of M. paniculata trap crop (without trap crop). The average psyllid population and cumulative HLB incidence in the plots with trap crop (0.1 psyllids/yellow stick card/fortnight and 2.1% symptomatic trees) were ≈31% lower than in plots without trap crop (0.14 psyllids/yellow stick card/fortnight and 3.1% symptomatic trees). The number of new shoots/branch was higher in M. paniculata than in citrus trees in 83% of the assessment dates. The trap crop tactic becomes viable when HLB incidence exceeds 4.5% for orchards with trees younger than three years, and 17.1% for orchards with trees between three and 5.5 years of age. Therefore, this study confirms that M. paniculata can be used as a trap crop for managing D. citri and HLB; however, its economic viability depends on disease incidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Crop Protection
Crop Protection 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
200
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics: -Abiotic damage- Agronomic control methods- Assessment of pest and disease damage- Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases- Biological control- Biorational pesticides- Control of animal pests of world crops- Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms- Control of weeds and integrated management- Economic considerations- Effects of plant growth regulators- Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use- Environmental effects of pesticides- Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control- GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications- Importance and control of postharvest crop losses- Integrated control- Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies- Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection- Pesticide application methods- Pest management- Phytobiomes for pest and disease control- Resistance management- Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信