阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者在cpap远程监测期间呼吸暂停低通气指数的计算引起的关注。

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Celia Vidal, Jean-Pierre Mallet, Sarah Skinner, Raphael Gilson, Olivier Gaubert, Arnaud Prigent, Frédéric Gagnadoux, Arnaud Bourdin, Nicolas Molinari, Dany Jaffuel
{"title":"阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者在cpap远程监测期间呼吸暂停低通气指数的计算引起的关注。","authors":"Celia Vidal, Jean-Pierre Mallet, Sarah Skinner, Raphael Gilson, Olivier Gaubert, Arnaud Prigent, Frédéric Gagnadoux, Arnaud Bourdin, Nicolas Molinari, Dany Jaffuel","doi":"10.1186/s12931-025-03324-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) telemonitoring is increasingly important in managing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The Apnea-Hypopnea Index reported by CPAP devices (AHI<sub>flow</sub>) is used as a key indicator of treatment effectiveness. However, discrepancies in AHI<sub>flow</sub> calculation rules between manufacturers may affect clinical decision-making. No prior studies have investigated whether manufacturers' choices to exclude certain apnea-hypopnea events from the AHI<sub>flow</sub> calculation may influence the number of patients presenting an AHI<sub>flow</sub> alert. The aim of this proof-of-concept study was not to compare the manufacturers with each other, but to evaluate, for each manufacturer, how the different possible ways of calculating AHI<sub>flow</sub> influence the percentage of alert cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 13,764 CPAP-treated OSA patients monitored on October 2, 2023. AHI<sub>flow</sub> calculations were evaluated according to manufacturer-specific rules. When possible, we assessed the impact of excluding central hypopneas, events during major leaks, and/or ramp periods on the percentage of patients crossing the consensual AHI<sub>flow</sub> alert threshold of ≥ 10 events/h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified significant disparities in AHI<sub>flow</sub> calculations between manufacturers, which lead to significant differences in the number of patients flagged as being in an alert state. Excluding central hypopneas reduced the number of alert cases by 50%, while excluding apneas/hypopneas during major leaks or ramp periods reduced alerts by 20%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our proof-of-concept study highlights inconsistencies in AHI<sub>flow</sub> calculations among CPAP manufacturers, raising concerns about patient care. Establishing standardized AHI<sub>flow</sub> calculation criteria is essential to ensuring accurate monitoring and optimal patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":49131,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"244"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12255124/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concerns arising from the calculation of the apnea-hypopnea index during CPAP-telemonitoring of patients with obstructive sleep apnea.\",\"authors\":\"Celia Vidal, Jean-Pierre Mallet, Sarah Skinner, Raphael Gilson, Olivier Gaubert, Arnaud Prigent, Frédéric Gagnadoux, Arnaud Bourdin, Nicolas Molinari, Dany Jaffuel\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12931-025-03324-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) telemonitoring is increasingly important in managing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The Apnea-Hypopnea Index reported by CPAP devices (AHI<sub>flow</sub>) is used as a key indicator of treatment effectiveness. However, discrepancies in AHI<sub>flow</sub> calculation rules between manufacturers may affect clinical decision-making. No prior studies have investigated whether manufacturers' choices to exclude certain apnea-hypopnea events from the AHI<sub>flow</sub> calculation may influence the number of patients presenting an AHI<sub>flow</sub> alert. The aim of this proof-of-concept study was not to compare the manufacturers with each other, but to evaluate, for each manufacturer, how the different possible ways of calculating AHI<sub>flow</sub> influence the percentage of alert cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 13,764 CPAP-treated OSA patients monitored on October 2, 2023. AHI<sub>flow</sub> calculations were evaluated according to manufacturer-specific rules. When possible, we assessed the impact of excluding central hypopneas, events during major leaks, and/or ramp periods on the percentage of patients crossing the consensual AHI<sub>flow</sub> alert threshold of ≥ 10 events/h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified significant disparities in AHI<sub>flow</sub> calculations between manufacturers, which lead to significant differences in the number of patients flagged as being in an alert state. Excluding central hypopneas reduced the number of alert cases by 50%, while excluding apneas/hypopneas during major leaks or ramp periods reduced alerts by 20%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our proof-of-concept study highlights inconsistencies in AHI<sub>flow</sub> calculations among CPAP manufacturers, raising concerns about patient care. Establishing standardized AHI<sub>flow</sub> calculation criteria is essential to ensuring accurate monitoring and optimal patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory Research\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12255124/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-025-03324-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-025-03324-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:持续气道正压(CPAP)远程监测在治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)中越来越重要。CPAP设备报告的呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHIflow)被用作治疗效果的关键指标。然而,不同生产厂家间AHIflow计算规则的差异可能会影响临床决策。之前没有研究调查制造商选择从AHIflow计算中排除某些呼吸暂停低通气事件是否会影响出现AHIflow警报的患者数量。这一概念验证研究的目的不是相互比较制造商,而是评估每个制造商,计算AHIflow的不同可能方法如何影响警报病例的百分比。方法:对2023年10月2日监测的13764例经cpap治疗的OSA患者进行回顾性分析。AHIflow计算根据制造商特定规则进行评估。在可能的情况下,我们评估了排除中枢性低呼吸、主要泄漏期间的事件和/或斜坡期对患者越过同意的AHIflow警报阈值≥10事件/小时的百分比的影响。结果:我们确定了不同制造商在AHIflow计算上的显著差异,这导致了标记为处于警戒状态的患者数量的显著差异。排除中枢性呼吸不足可使警报病例减少50%,而排除重大泄漏或斜坡期间的呼吸暂停/呼吸不足可使警报减少20%。结论:我们的概念验证研究强调了CPAP制造商之间AHIflow计算的不一致性,引起了对患者护理的关注。建立标准化的AHIflow计算标准对于确保准确监测和最佳患者安全至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Concerns arising from the calculation of the apnea-hypopnea index during CPAP-telemonitoring of patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Concerns arising from the calculation of the apnea-hypopnea index during CPAP-telemonitoring of patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Concerns arising from the calculation of the apnea-hypopnea index during CPAP-telemonitoring of patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Background: Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) telemonitoring is increasingly important in managing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The Apnea-Hypopnea Index reported by CPAP devices (AHIflow) is used as a key indicator of treatment effectiveness. However, discrepancies in AHIflow calculation rules between manufacturers may affect clinical decision-making. No prior studies have investigated whether manufacturers' choices to exclude certain apnea-hypopnea events from the AHIflow calculation may influence the number of patients presenting an AHIflow alert. The aim of this proof-of-concept study was not to compare the manufacturers with each other, but to evaluate, for each manufacturer, how the different possible ways of calculating AHIflow influence the percentage of alert cases.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 13,764 CPAP-treated OSA patients monitored on October 2, 2023. AHIflow calculations were evaluated according to manufacturer-specific rules. When possible, we assessed the impact of excluding central hypopneas, events during major leaks, and/or ramp periods on the percentage of patients crossing the consensual AHIflow alert threshold of ≥ 10 events/h.

Results: We identified significant disparities in AHIflow calculations between manufacturers, which lead to significant differences in the number of patients flagged as being in an alert state. Excluding central hypopneas reduced the number of alert cases by 50%, while excluding apneas/hypopneas during major leaks or ramp periods reduced alerts by 20%.

Conclusions: Our proof-of-concept study highlights inconsistencies in AHIflow calculations among CPAP manufacturers, raising concerns about patient care. Establishing standardized AHIflow calculation criteria is essential to ensuring accurate monitoring and optimal patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory Research
Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
1.70%
发文量
314
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Respiratory Research publishes high-quality clinical and basic research, review and commentary articles on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related diseases. As the leading fully open access journal in the field, Respiratory Research provides an essential resource for pulmonologists, allergists, immunologists and other physicians, researchers, healthcare workers and medical students with worldwide dissemination of articles resulting in high visibility and generating international discussion. Topics of specific interest include asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis, genetics, infectious diseases, interstitial lung diseases, lung development, lung tumors, occupational and environmental factors, pulmonary circulation, pulmonary pharmacology and therapeutics, respiratory immunology, respiratory physiology, and sleep-related respiratory problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信