跨研究和临床背景的歌唱嗓音障碍指数:系统回顾。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Jean Carlos Gorges, Maria da Assunção C Matos, Isabel Monteiro da Costa, Isabel Maria de Oliveira Alcobia
{"title":"跨研究和临床背景的歌唱嗓音障碍指数:系统回顾。","authors":"Jean Carlos Gorges, Maria da Assunção C Matos, Isabel Monteiro da Costa, Isabel Maria de Oliveira Alcobia","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.06.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the applications of the Singing Voice Handicap Index (SVHI) in different clinical and scientific contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA) guidelines, covering articles published between 2018 and June 2024 in the Cochrane, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Scopus, and SciELO Brasil databases. Eligibility criteria included clinical trials and observational and statistical studies. Articles in Brazilian and European Portuguese, as well as English, were considered. Study selection was performed by three researchers: two independently conducted the initial screening, while the third resolved conflicts and made final decisions. The risk of bias and reliability of the evidence were assessed using the RoB 2.0 and GRADE tools to ensure the inclusion of methodologically robust studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 111 studies were gathered, and after all phases of selection, 26 were included. The findings revealed a wide range of SVHI applications in various clinical interventions, highlighting its adaptability to different methodological approaches.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>The evidence analysis showed that 92.31% of the studies had a low risk of bias, reinforcing the reliability of the evidence included in the review.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The diverse applicability of the SVHI as a vocal assessment instrument highlights its flexibility and adaptability across different study types and interventions. Moreover, this protocol has proven effective in standardizing and comparing results. This study reinforces the SVHI as an essential tool in both clinical and academic settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Singing Voice Handicap Index Across Research and Clinical Context: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Jean Carlos Gorges, Maria da Assunção C Matos, Isabel Monteiro da Costa, Isabel Maria de Oliveira Alcobia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.06.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the applications of the Singing Voice Handicap Index (SVHI) in different clinical and scientific contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA) guidelines, covering articles published between 2018 and June 2024 in the Cochrane, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Scopus, and SciELO Brasil databases. Eligibility criteria included clinical trials and observational and statistical studies. Articles in Brazilian and European Portuguese, as well as English, were considered. Study selection was performed by three researchers: two independently conducted the initial screening, while the third resolved conflicts and made final decisions. The risk of bias and reliability of the evidence were assessed using the RoB 2.0 and GRADE tools to ensure the inclusion of methodologically robust studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 111 studies were gathered, and after all phases of selection, 26 were included. The findings revealed a wide range of SVHI applications in various clinical interventions, highlighting its adaptability to different methodological approaches.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>The evidence analysis showed that 92.31% of the studies had a low risk of bias, reinforcing the reliability of the evidence included in the review.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The diverse applicability of the SVHI as a vocal assessment instrument highlights its flexibility and adaptability across different study types and interventions. Moreover, this protocol has proven effective in standardizing and comparing results. This study reinforces the SVHI as an essential tool in both clinical and academic settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.06.021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.06.021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在对歌唱嗓音障碍指数(SVHI)在不同临床和科学背景下的应用进行系统综述。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析方案(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目进行系统检索,涵盖2018年至2024年6月在Cochrane、ScienceDirect、Web of Science、Scopus和SciELO Brasil数据库中发表的文章。入选标准包括临床试验、观察性和统计学研究。巴西和欧洲葡萄牙语以及英语的文章都被考虑过。研究选择由三位研究人员进行:两位独立进行初步筛选,而第三位解决冲突并做出最终决定。使用RoB 2.0和GRADE工具评估偏倚风险和证据的可靠性,以确保纳入方法学上可靠的研究。结果:共收集到111项研究,经过各阶段筛选,最终纳入26项研究。研究结果揭示了SVHI在各种临床干预中的广泛应用,突出了其对不同方法学方法的适应性。证据水平:证据分析显示92.31%的研究偏倚风险较低,强化了纳入文献证据的可靠性。结论:SVHI作为一种声音评估工具的多样化适用性突出了其在不同研究类型和干预措施中的灵活性和适应性。此外,该协议已被证明在标准化和比较结果方面是有效的。这项研究加强了SVHI在临床和学术环境中的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Singing Voice Handicap Index Across Research and Clinical Context: A Systematic Review.

Objective: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the applications of the Singing Voice Handicap Index (SVHI) in different clinical and scientific contexts.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA) guidelines, covering articles published between 2018 and June 2024 in the Cochrane, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Scopus, and SciELO Brasil databases. Eligibility criteria included clinical trials and observational and statistical studies. Articles in Brazilian and European Portuguese, as well as English, were considered. Study selection was performed by three researchers: two independently conducted the initial screening, while the third resolved conflicts and made final decisions. The risk of bias and reliability of the evidence were assessed using the RoB 2.0 and GRADE tools to ensure the inclusion of methodologically robust studies.

Results: A total of 111 studies were gathered, and after all phases of selection, 26 were included. The findings revealed a wide range of SVHI applications in various clinical interventions, highlighting its adaptability to different methodological approaches.

Level of evidence: The evidence analysis showed that 92.31% of the studies had a low risk of bias, reinforcing the reliability of the evidence included in the review.

Conclusion: The diverse applicability of the SVHI as a vocal assessment instrument highlights its flexibility and adaptability across different study types and interventions. Moreover, this protocol has proven effective in standardizing and comparing results. This study reinforces the SVHI as an essential tool in both clinical and academic settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信