估计县级牙科保健利用成人在加利福尼亚州使用多层次模型与耙方法。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yilan Huang, Honghu Liu
{"title":"估计县级牙科保健利用成人在加利福尼亚州使用多层次模型与耙方法。","authors":"Yilan Huang, Honghu Liu","doi":"10.1186/s13690-025-01673-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Regular dental visits are essential for oral health, yet disparities between regions exist due to socioeconomic and geographic factors. While national surveys provide valuable data on dental care utilization, they generally lack sufficient sample sizes at the local level to generate reliable county-level estimates. Small area estimation techniques, such as multilevel regression and post-stratification (MRP), can help address this gap by producing robust estimates for smaller geographic areas. However, the MRP approach relies on detailed population data in the form of joint distributions and cannot be applied when only marginal distributions are available.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This paper introduces a hybrid approach combining multilevel modeling with the raking procedure. We used individual-level data from the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and census data from American Community Survey to estimate county-level dental care utilization among adults in California.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The county-level dental care utilization in California ranged from 52.5 to 73.1%, with a median of 63.1%. Our model-based estimates matched direct BRFSS estimates at metropolitan and micropolitan statistical area levels. Furthermore, we found significantly positive correlations between our model-based estimates and direct estimates from the California Health Interview Survey for 41 counties (Pearson coefficient: 0.801, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed approach accounts for individual- and area-level factors while overcoming data constraints that limit the application of MRP. The findings demonstrate the feasibility of this approach in generating county-level estimates, supporting public health planning and targeted interventions to reduce disparities in dental care utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"183"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247392/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating county-level dental care utilization among adults in California using multilevel modeling with raking approach.\",\"authors\":\"Yilan Huang, Honghu Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13690-025-01673-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Regular dental visits are essential for oral health, yet disparities between regions exist due to socioeconomic and geographic factors. While national surveys provide valuable data on dental care utilization, they generally lack sufficient sample sizes at the local level to generate reliable county-level estimates. Small area estimation techniques, such as multilevel regression and post-stratification (MRP), can help address this gap by producing robust estimates for smaller geographic areas. However, the MRP approach relies on detailed population data in the form of joint distributions and cannot be applied when only marginal distributions are available.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This paper introduces a hybrid approach combining multilevel modeling with the raking procedure. We used individual-level data from the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and census data from American Community Survey to estimate county-level dental care utilization among adults in California.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The county-level dental care utilization in California ranged from 52.5 to 73.1%, with a median of 63.1%. Our model-based estimates matched direct BRFSS estimates at metropolitan and micropolitan statistical area levels. Furthermore, we found significantly positive correlations between our model-based estimates and direct estimates from the California Health Interview Survey for 41 counties (Pearson coefficient: 0.801, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed approach accounts for individual- and area-level factors while overcoming data constraints that limit the application of MRP. The findings demonstrate the feasibility of this approach in generating county-level estimates, supporting public health planning and targeted interventions to reduce disparities in dental care utilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247392/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01673-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01673-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:定期看牙医对口腔健康至关重要,但由于社会经济和地理因素,地区之间存在差异。虽然国家调查提供了关于牙科保健利用的宝贵数据,但它们在地方一级通常缺乏足够的样本量,无法产生可靠的县级估计。小区域估计技术,例如多层回归和后分层(MRP),可以通过为较小的地理区域产生可靠的估计来帮助解决这一差距。然而,MRP方法依赖于联合分布形式的详细人口数据,当只有边际分布可用时不能应用。方法:本文介绍了一种多级建模与倾斜过程相结合的混合方法。我们使用2018年行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)的个人数据和美国社区调查的人口普查数据来估计加利福尼亚州成年人的县级牙科保健利用情况。结果:加州县级牙科保健使用率为52.5% ~ 73.1%,中位数为63.1%。我们基于模型的估计与大都市和小城市统计区域水平的直接BRFSS估计相匹配。此外,我们发现基于模型的估计值与来自41个县的加州健康访谈调查的直接估计值之间存在显著的正相关(Pearson系数:0.801,P)。结论:提出的方法考虑了个体和区域水平的因素,同时克服了限制MRP应用的数据约束。研究结果表明,这种方法在产生县级估计、支持公共卫生规划和有针对性的干预措施以减少牙科保健利用方面的差距方面是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Estimating county-level dental care utilization among adults in California using multilevel modeling with raking approach.

Estimating county-level dental care utilization among adults in California using multilevel modeling with raking approach.

Estimating county-level dental care utilization among adults in California using multilevel modeling with raking approach.

Estimating county-level dental care utilization among adults in California using multilevel modeling with raking approach.

Background: Regular dental visits are essential for oral health, yet disparities between regions exist due to socioeconomic and geographic factors. While national surveys provide valuable data on dental care utilization, they generally lack sufficient sample sizes at the local level to generate reliable county-level estimates. Small area estimation techniques, such as multilevel regression and post-stratification (MRP), can help address this gap by producing robust estimates for smaller geographic areas. However, the MRP approach relies on detailed population data in the form of joint distributions and cannot be applied when only marginal distributions are available.

Methods: This paper introduces a hybrid approach combining multilevel modeling with the raking procedure. We used individual-level data from the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and census data from American Community Survey to estimate county-level dental care utilization among adults in California.

Results: The county-level dental care utilization in California ranged from 52.5 to 73.1%, with a median of 63.1%. Our model-based estimates matched direct BRFSS estimates at metropolitan and micropolitan statistical area levels. Furthermore, we found significantly positive correlations between our model-based estimates and direct estimates from the California Health Interview Survey for 41 counties (Pearson coefficient: 0.801, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The proposed approach accounts for individual- and area-level factors while overcoming data constraints that limit the application of MRP. The findings demonstrate the feasibility of this approach in generating county-level estimates, supporting public health planning and targeted interventions to reduce disparities in dental care utilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信