彭普利单抗联合卡铂-紫杉醇作为中国转移性鳞状非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的成本-效果分析

IF 3.3 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Luwei Wang, Jiasheng Chen, Lihui Lin, Xiaowei Huang
{"title":"彭普利单抗联合卡铂-紫杉醇作为中国转移性鳞状非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的成本-效果分析","authors":"Luwei Wang, Jiasheng Chen, Lihui Lin, Xiaowei Huang","doi":"10.1186/s13561-025-00656-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Squamous NSCLC (sqNSCLC), a subtype with few targetable mutations, is often diagnosed at advanced stages. Platinum-based chemo-therapy, the first-line treatment, yields median overall survival (OS) of less than or equal to one year, underscoring the need for better therapies. Penpulimab, a novel PD-1 inhibitor developed in China, is a humanized IgG1 antibody with a modified Fc region. Phase III trial data (AK105-302) showed penpulimab + carboplatin-paclitaxel (PEN-CP) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in metastatic sqNSCLC vs. placebo (CP), with a favorable safety profile. However, its high cost and lack of cost-effectiveness analyses warrant further study. This research evaluates PEN-CP's cost-effectiveness vs. CP from the Chinese healthcare perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-state Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of PEN-CP as a first-line treatment for metastatic sqNSCLC. Clinical efficacy data were sourced from the AK105-302 trial, while drug costs were derived from national tender prices. Additional costs and health utilities were obtained from published literature. The primary outcomes included total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). To assess the robustness of the findings, both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to CP, the ICER for PEN-CP was $14,918.81 per QALY. The ICER values were below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $38,060.00 per QALY. The key drivers of the model outcomes were the price of penpulimab, the PFS stage utility value, and the cost of optimal supportive care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, penpulimab combined with first-line chemotherapy demonstrates is cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $38,060.00 per QALY for patients with metastatic sqNSCLC and represents a promising first-line treatment option.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"60"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12255038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-effectiveness analysis of penpulimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in China.\",\"authors\":\"Luwei Wang, Jiasheng Chen, Lihui Lin, Xiaowei Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13561-025-00656-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Squamous NSCLC (sqNSCLC), a subtype with few targetable mutations, is often diagnosed at advanced stages. Platinum-based chemo-therapy, the first-line treatment, yields median overall survival (OS) of less than or equal to one year, underscoring the need for better therapies. Penpulimab, a novel PD-1 inhibitor developed in China, is a humanized IgG1 antibody with a modified Fc region. Phase III trial data (AK105-302) showed penpulimab + carboplatin-paclitaxel (PEN-CP) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in metastatic sqNSCLC vs. placebo (CP), with a favorable safety profile. However, its high cost and lack of cost-effectiveness analyses warrant further study. This research evaluates PEN-CP's cost-effectiveness vs. CP from the Chinese healthcare perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-state Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of PEN-CP as a first-line treatment for metastatic sqNSCLC. Clinical efficacy data were sourced from the AK105-302 trial, while drug costs were derived from national tender prices. Additional costs and health utilities were obtained from published literature. The primary outcomes included total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). To assess the robustness of the findings, both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to CP, the ICER for PEN-CP was $14,918.81 per QALY. The ICER values were below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $38,060.00 per QALY. The key drivers of the model outcomes were the price of penpulimab, the PFS stage utility value, and the cost of optimal supportive care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, penpulimab combined with first-line chemotherapy demonstrates is cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $38,060.00 per QALY for patients with metastatic sqNSCLC and represents a promising first-line treatment option.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Economics Review\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12255038/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Economics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00656-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00656-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:鳞状非小细胞肺癌(sqNSCLC)是一种很少有靶向突变的亚型,通常在晚期被诊断出来。以铂为基础的化疗,一线治疗,产生的中位总生存期(OS)小于或等于1年,强调需要更好的治疗方法。Penpulimab是中国开发的一种新型PD-1抑制剂,是一种带有Fc区修饰的人源化IgG1抗体。III期试验数据(AK105-302)显示,与安慰剂(CP)相比,彭普利单抗+卡铂-紫杉醇(PEN-CP)可显著改善转移性sqNSCLC的无进展生存期(PFS)和OS,并具有良好的安全性。然而,其成本高,缺乏成本效益分析值得进一步研究。本研究从中国医疗保健的角度评估了PEN-CP与CP的成本效益。方法:建立一个三状态马尔可夫模型来评估PEN-CP作为转移性sqNSCLC一线治疗的成本-效果。临床疗效数据来源于AK105-302试验,药物成本来源于国家招标价格。从已发表的文献中获得了额外费用和保健费用。主要结局包括总成本、质量调整生命年(QALYs)和增量成本-效果比(ICERs)。为了评估研究结果的稳健性,我们进行了单向和概率敏感性分析。结果:与CP相比,PEN-CP的ICER为14918.81美元/ QALY。ICER值低于每个QALY $38,060.00的支付意愿阈值。模型结果的关键驱动因素是彭普利单抗的价格、PFS阶段效用值和最佳支持治疗的成本。结论:从中国医疗体系的角度来看,对于转移性sqNSCLC患者,penpulimumab联合一线化疗具有成本效益,其支付意愿阈值为38,060.00美元/ QALY,是一种有前景的一线治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of penpulimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in China.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of penpulimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in China.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of penpulimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in China.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of penpulimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in China.

Purpose: Squamous NSCLC (sqNSCLC), a subtype with few targetable mutations, is often diagnosed at advanced stages. Platinum-based chemo-therapy, the first-line treatment, yields median overall survival (OS) of less than or equal to one year, underscoring the need for better therapies. Penpulimab, a novel PD-1 inhibitor developed in China, is a humanized IgG1 antibody with a modified Fc region. Phase III trial data (AK105-302) showed penpulimab + carboplatin-paclitaxel (PEN-CP) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in metastatic sqNSCLC vs. placebo (CP), with a favorable safety profile. However, its high cost and lack of cost-effectiveness analyses warrant further study. This research evaluates PEN-CP's cost-effectiveness vs. CP from the Chinese healthcare perspective.

Methods: A three-state Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of PEN-CP as a first-line treatment for metastatic sqNSCLC. Clinical efficacy data were sourced from the AK105-302 trial, while drug costs were derived from national tender prices. Additional costs and health utilities were obtained from published literature. The primary outcomes included total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). To assess the robustness of the findings, both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.

Results: Compared to CP, the ICER for PEN-CP was $14,918.81 per QALY. The ICER values were below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $38,060.00 per QALY. The key drivers of the model outcomes were the price of penpulimab, the PFS stage utility value, and the cost of optimal supportive care.

Conclusions: From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, penpulimab combined with first-line chemotherapy demonstrates is cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $38,060.00 per QALY for patients with metastatic sqNSCLC and represents a promising first-line treatment option.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
59
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信