Joseph Nickel, Sujeeth Shanmugam, Niki Jona, Kaushal Shah, Predrag Gligorovic
{"title":"双相情感障碍英语自我报告测量的可读性。","authors":"Joseph Nickel, Sujeeth Shanmugam, Niki Jona, Kaushal Shah, Predrag Gligorovic","doi":"10.4088/PCC.24m03892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Self-report measures have been used as a tool to evaluate mania and depressive symptoms and aid in diagnosing bipolar disorder. The American Medical Association recommends that the evaluation reading be at a fifth- to sixth-grade level. The research literature has previously established that questionnaires regarding other psychiatric conditions have been written at an elevated reading level compared to the recommended guidelines. The objective of this study was to calculate the overall readability of measures in bipolar disorder and the individual readability of the items and instructions sections.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Measures in assessing bipolar disorder were selected from a publicly available literature search in the PsycINFO, PubMed, PubMed Central, and Google Scholar databases. Nine English-language measures met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The readability of each measure was analyzed via 4 validated formulas, Gunning Fog, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, FORCAST, and Flesch Reading Ease, through an external website (readable.com). Measures with an average readability greater than 6.00 were considered above the recommended reading level.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> All measures had at least 1 component (instructions or items) written above the recommended reading level. The mean reading level of the instructions and items sections were 9.35 (SD = 1.45; range, 7.03-11.51) and 8.78 (SD = 1.73; range, 5.59-11.31), respectively.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The results indicate that using these measures in populations with low reading literacy may be a limitation in correctly identifying manic and depressive symptomology. If the self-report symptom tool is utilized with a higher readability than the average patient, it may not be guaranteed that this tool will improve the diagnosis process.</p><p><p><i>Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2025;27(3):24m03892</i>.</p><p><p>\n <i>Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.</i>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":22814,"journal":{"name":"The primary care companion for CNS disorders","volume":"27 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Readability of English-Language Self-Report Measures in Bipolar Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Nickel, Sujeeth Shanmugam, Niki Jona, Kaushal Shah, Predrag Gligorovic\",\"doi\":\"10.4088/PCC.24m03892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Self-report measures have been used as a tool to evaluate mania and depressive symptoms and aid in diagnosing bipolar disorder. The American Medical Association recommends that the evaluation reading be at a fifth- to sixth-grade level. The research literature has previously established that questionnaires regarding other psychiatric conditions have been written at an elevated reading level compared to the recommended guidelines. The objective of this study was to calculate the overall readability of measures in bipolar disorder and the individual readability of the items and instructions sections.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Measures in assessing bipolar disorder were selected from a publicly available literature search in the PsycINFO, PubMed, PubMed Central, and Google Scholar databases. Nine English-language measures met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The readability of each measure was analyzed via 4 validated formulas, Gunning Fog, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, FORCAST, and Flesch Reading Ease, through an external website (readable.com). Measures with an average readability greater than 6.00 were considered above the recommended reading level.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> All measures had at least 1 component (instructions or items) written above the recommended reading level. The mean reading level of the instructions and items sections were 9.35 (SD = 1.45; range, 7.03-11.51) and 8.78 (SD = 1.73; range, 5.59-11.31), respectively.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The results indicate that using these measures in populations with low reading literacy may be a limitation in correctly identifying manic and depressive symptomology. If the self-report symptom tool is utilized with a higher readability than the average patient, it may not be guaranteed that this tool will improve the diagnosis process.</p><p><p><i>Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2025;27(3):24m03892</i>.</p><p><p>\\n <i>Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.</i>\\n </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The primary care companion for CNS disorders\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The primary care companion for CNS disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.24m03892\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The primary care companion for CNS disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.24m03892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Readability of English-Language Self-Report Measures in Bipolar Disorder.
Objective: Self-report measures have been used as a tool to evaluate mania and depressive symptoms and aid in diagnosing bipolar disorder. The American Medical Association recommends that the evaluation reading be at a fifth- to sixth-grade level. The research literature has previously established that questionnaires regarding other psychiatric conditions have been written at an elevated reading level compared to the recommended guidelines. The objective of this study was to calculate the overall readability of measures in bipolar disorder and the individual readability of the items and instructions sections.
Methods: Measures in assessing bipolar disorder were selected from a publicly available literature search in the PsycINFO, PubMed, PubMed Central, and Google Scholar databases. Nine English-language measures met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The readability of each measure was analyzed via 4 validated formulas, Gunning Fog, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, FORCAST, and Flesch Reading Ease, through an external website (readable.com). Measures with an average readability greater than 6.00 were considered above the recommended reading level.
Results: All measures had at least 1 component (instructions or items) written above the recommended reading level. The mean reading level of the instructions and items sections were 9.35 (SD = 1.45; range, 7.03-11.51) and 8.78 (SD = 1.73; range, 5.59-11.31), respectively.
Conclusion: The results indicate that using these measures in populations with low reading literacy may be a limitation in correctly identifying manic and depressive symptomology. If the self-report symptom tool is utilized with a higher readability than the average patient, it may not be guaranteed that this tool will improve the diagnosis process.
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2025;27(3):24m03892.
Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1998, The Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders (ISSN 2155-7780), formerly The Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, is an international, peer-reviewed, online-only journal, and its articles are indexed by the National Library of Medicine. PCC seeks to advance the clinical expertise of primary care physicians and other health care professionals who treat patients with mental and neurologic illnesses. PCC publishes research from disciplines such as medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and psychology, especially as it pertains to integrated delivery systems and interdisciplinary collaboration. PCC focuses on providing information of direct clinical utility and giving a voice to clinician researchers. Practice-based research from individuals and groups with clinical expertise is particularly welcome. Pertinent manuscript types include: -Original research -Systematic reviews -Meta-analyses -Case reports and series -Commenting letters to the editor Articles published in PCC typically cover attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety, addiction, sleep disorders, pain, Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson’s disease.