双相情感障碍英语自我报告测量的可读性。

Q4 Medicine
Joseph Nickel, Sujeeth Shanmugam, Niki Jona, Kaushal Shah, Predrag Gligorovic
{"title":"双相情感障碍英语自我报告测量的可读性。","authors":"Joseph Nickel, Sujeeth Shanmugam, Niki Jona, Kaushal Shah, Predrag Gligorovic","doi":"10.4088/PCC.24m03892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Self-report measures have been used as a tool to evaluate mania and depressive symptoms and aid in diagnosing bipolar disorder. The American Medical Association recommends that the evaluation reading be at a fifth- to sixth-grade level. The research literature has previously established that questionnaires regarding other psychiatric conditions have been written at an elevated reading level compared to the recommended guidelines. The objective of this study was to calculate the overall readability of measures in bipolar disorder and the individual readability of the items and instructions sections.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Measures in assessing bipolar disorder were selected from a publicly available literature search in the PsycINFO, PubMed, PubMed Central, and Google Scholar databases. Nine English-language measures met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The readability of each measure was analyzed via 4 validated formulas, Gunning Fog, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, FORCAST, and Flesch Reading Ease, through an external website (readable.com). Measures with an average readability greater than 6.00 were considered above the recommended reading level.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> All measures had at least 1 component (instructions or items) written above the recommended reading level. The mean reading level of the instructions and items sections were 9.35 (SD = 1.45; range, 7.03-11.51) and 8.78 (SD = 1.73; range, 5.59-11.31), respectively.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The results indicate that using these measures in populations with low reading literacy may be a limitation in correctly identifying manic and depressive symptomology. If the self-report symptom tool is utilized with a higher readability than the average patient, it may not be guaranteed that this tool will improve the diagnosis process.</p><p><p><i>Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2025;27(3):24m03892</i>.</p><p><p>\n <i>Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.</i>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":22814,"journal":{"name":"The primary care companion for CNS disorders","volume":"27 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Readability of English-Language Self-Report Measures in Bipolar Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Nickel, Sujeeth Shanmugam, Niki Jona, Kaushal Shah, Predrag Gligorovic\",\"doi\":\"10.4088/PCC.24m03892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Self-report measures have been used as a tool to evaluate mania and depressive symptoms and aid in diagnosing bipolar disorder. The American Medical Association recommends that the evaluation reading be at a fifth- to sixth-grade level. The research literature has previously established that questionnaires regarding other psychiatric conditions have been written at an elevated reading level compared to the recommended guidelines. The objective of this study was to calculate the overall readability of measures in bipolar disorder and the individual readability of the items and instructions sections.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Measures in assessing bipolar disorder were selected from a publicly available literature search in the PsycINFO, PubMed, PubMed Central, and Google Scholar databases. Nine English-language measures met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The readability of each measure was analyzed via 4 validated formulas, Gunning Fog, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, FORCAST, and Flesch Reading Ease, through an external website (readable.com). Measures with an average readability greater than 6.00 were considered above the recommended reading level.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> All measures had at least 1 component (instructions or items) written above the recommended reading level. The mean reading level of the instructions and items sections were 9.35 (SD = 1.45; range, 7.03-11.51) and 8.78 (SD = 1.73; range, 5.59-11.31), respectively.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The results indicate that using these measures in populations with low reading literacy may be a limitation in correctly identifying manic and depressive symptomology. If the self-report symptom tool is utilized with a higher readability than the average patient, it may not be guaranteed that this tool will improve the diagnosis process.</p><p><p><i>Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2025;27(3):24m03892</i>.</p><p><p>\\n <i>Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.</i>\\n </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The primary care companion for CNS disorders\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The primary care companion for CNS disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.24m03892\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The primary care companion for CNS disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.24m03892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:自我报告测量已被用作评估躁狂和抑郁症状的工具,并有助于诊断双相情感障碍。美国医学协会建议,评估阅读应该达到五年级到六年级的水平。先前的研究文献已经证实,与推荐指南相比,关于其他精神疾病的调查问卷的阅读水平有所提高。本研究的目的是计算双相情感障碍量表的整体可读性以及项目和说明部分的个人可读性。方法:从PsycINFO、PubMed、PubMed Central和谷歌Scholar数据库的公开文献检索中选择评估双相情感障碍的措施。9项英语测量符合纳入标准并进行了分析。通过外部网站(readable.com),通过4个经过验证的公式(Gunning Fog, Simple measure of Gobbledygook, cast和Flesch Reading Ease)对每个测量的可读性进行分析。平均可读性大于6.00的测量值被认为高于推荐阅读水平。结果:所有量表至少有1个成分(说明或项目)高于推荐阅读水平。指令和项目部分的平均阅读水平为9.35 (SD = 1.45;区间为7.03-11.51)和8.78 (SD = 1.73;区间分别为5.59-11.31)。结论:结果表明,在阅读能力低的人群中使用这些措施可能会限制正确识别躁狂和抑郁症状。如果使用自我报告症状工具的可读性高于一般患者,则可能无法保证该工具将改善诊断过程。中枢神经系统疾病伴发护理2025;27(3):24m03892。本文末尾列出了作者所属单位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Readability of English-Language Self-Report Measures in Bipolar Disorder.

Objective: Self-report measures have been used as a tool to evaluate mania and depressive symptoms and aid in diagnosing bipolar disorder. The American Medical Association recommends that the evaluation reading be at a fifth- to sixth-grade level. The research literature has previously established that questionnaires regarding other psychiatric conditions have been written at an elevated reading level compared to the recommended guidelines. The objective of this study was to calculate the overall readability of measures in bipolar disorder and the individual readability of the items and instructions sections.

Methods: Measures in assessing bipolar disorder were selected from a publicly available literature search in the PsycINFO, PubMed, PubMed Central, and Google Scholar databases. Nine English-language measures met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The readability of each measure was analyzed via 4 validated formulas, Gunning Fog, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, FORCAST, and Flesch Reading Ease, through an external website (readable.com). Measures with an average readability greater than 6.00 were considered above the recommended reading level.

Results: All measures had at least 1 component (instructions or items) written above the recommended reading level. The mean reading level of the instructions and items sections were 9.35 (SD = 1.45; range, 7.03-11.51) and 8.78 (SD = 1.73; range, 5.59-11.31), respectively.

Conclusion: The results indicate that using these measures in populations with low reading literacy may be a limitation in correctly identifying manic and depressive symptomology. If the self-report symptom tool is utilized with a higher readability than the average patient, it may not be guaranteed that this tool will improve the diagnosis process.

Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2025;27(3):24m03892.

Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: Founded in 1998, The Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders (ISSN 2155-7780), formerly The Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, is an international, peer-reviewed, online-only journal, and its articles are indexed by the National Library of Medicine. PCC seeks to advance the clinical expertise of primary care physicians and other health care professionals who treat patients with mental and neurologic illnesses. PCC publishes research from disciplines such as medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and psychology, especially as it pertains to integrated delivery systems and interdisciplinary collaboration. PCC focuses on providing information of direct clinical utility and giving a voice to clinician researchers. Practice-based research from individuals and groups with clinical expertise is particularly welcome. Pertinent manuscript types include: -Original research -Systematic reviews -Meta-analyses -Case reports and series -Commenting letters to the editor Articles published in PCC typically cover attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety, addiction, sleep disorders, pain, Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson’s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信