Uday Chand Jha, C P Nath, Pronob J Paul, Harsh Nayyar, Narendra Kumar, G P Dixit, Suman Sen, Yogesh Kumar, P V Vara Prasad
{"title":"鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum L.)耐热性的基因型适应多性状分析","authors":"Uday Chand Jha, C P Nath, Pronob J Paul, Harsh Nayyar, Narendra Kumar, G P Dixit, Suman Sen, Yogesh Kumar, P V Vara Prasad","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-07573-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increasing heat stress is detrimental to chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) growth and production. Therefore, dedicated efforts are urgently needed to develop heat tolerant chickpea genotypes for food security. This study evaluates the tolerance of 26 chickpea genotypes under heat stress and non-stress conditions across three years (2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-2020) under field conditions. Significant genotypic variation was observed for phenological (days to flowering, pod initiation, maturity) and physiological traits (chlorophyll content, nitrogen balance index, membrane stability) under both environments. Heat stress resulted in a considerable reduction in biomass and yield-related traits. Under heat stress, days to 50% flowering and maturity were reduced by 4 days and 24 days, respectively, while a 34.7% average yield reduction was observed compared to non-stressed conditions. Genotypes 'IPC 2014-55', 'IPC 2011-78', and 'ICC 92944' exhibited the least yield loss and showed better resilience under heat stress. The GGE biplot analysis identified genotypes with superior performance and stability, genotypes 'IPC 2014-55' and 'IPC 2011-78', performed consistently across both stressed and non-stressed conditions. AMMI analysis and PCA-based clustering revealed significant genotype-by-environment interactions, with certain genotypes like 'IPC 2019-05' exhibiting distinct variations under stress, because of extra early maturity. The study concludes that genotypes 'IPC 2014-55', 'IPC 2011-78', and 'IPC 2019-05' are promising candidates for breeding heat-tolerant chickpea. Correlation analysis indicated that selection of genotypes with high cell membrane stability, chlorophyll, high seed yield plant<sup>-1</sup>, and high pods plant<sup>-1</sup> under heat stress environment are suitable for developing heat tolerant chickpeas.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"25055"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254367/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decoding the heat stress resilience in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): multi-trait analysis for genotypic adaptation.\",\"authors\":\"Uday Chand Jha, C P Nath, Pronob J Paul, Harsh Nayyar, Narendra Kumar, G P Dixit, Suman Sen, Yogesh Kumar, P V Vara Prasad\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-07573-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Increasing heat stress is detrimental to chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) growth and production. Therefore, dedicated efforts are urgently needed to develop heat tolerant chickpea genotypes for food security. This study evaluates the tolerance of 26 chickpea genotypes under heat stress and non-stress conditions across three years (2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-2020) under field conditions. Significant genotypic variation was observed for phenological (days to flowering, pod initiation, maturity) and physiological traits (chlorophyll content, nitrogen balance index, membrane stability) under both environments. Heat stress resulted in a considerable reduction in biomass and yield-related traits. Under heat stress, days to 50% flowering and maturity were reduced by 4 days and 24 days, respectively, while a 34.7% average yield reduction was observed compared to non-stressed conditions. Genotypes 'IPC 2014-55', 'IPC 2011-78', and 'ICC 92944' exhibited the least yield loss and showed better resilience under heat stress. The GGE biplot analysis identified genotypes with superior performance and stability, genotypes 'IPC 2014-55' and 'IPC 2011-78', performed consistently across both stressed and non-stressed conditions. AMMI analysis and PCA-based clustering revealed significant genotype-by-environment interactions, with certain genotypes like 'IPC 2019-05' exhibiting distinct variations under stress, because of extra early maturity. The study concludes that genotypes 'IPC 2014-55', 'IPC 2011-78', and 'IPC 2019-05' are promising candidates for breeding heat-tolerant chickpea. Correlation analysis indicated that selection of genotypes with high cell membrane stability, chlorophyll, high seed yield plant<sup>-1</sup>, and high pods plant<sup>-1</sup> under heat stress environment are suitable for developing heat tolerant chickpeas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"25055\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254367/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07573-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07573-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Decoding the heat stress resilience in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): multi-trait analysis for genotypic adaptation.
Increasing heat stress is detrimental to chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) growth and production. Therefore, dedicated efforts are urgently needed to develop heat tolerant chickpea genotypes for food security. This study evaluates the tolerance of 26 chickpea genotypes under heat stress and non-stress conditions across three years (2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-2020) under field conditions. Significant genotypic variation was observed for phenological (days to flowering, pod initiation, maturity) and physiological traits (chlorophyll content, nitrogen balance index, membrane stability) under both environments. Heat stress resulted in a considerable reduction in biomass and yield-related traits. Under heat stress, days to 50% flowering and maturity were reduced by 4 days and 24 days, respectively, while a 34.7% average yield reduction was observed compared to non-stressed conditions. Genotypes 'IPC 2014-55', 'IPC 2011-78', and 'ICC 92944' exhibited the least yield loss and showed better resilience under heat stress. The GGE biplot analysis identified genotypes with superior performance and stability, genotypes 'IPC 2014-55' and 'IPC 2011-78', performed consistently across both stressed and non-stressed conditions. AMMI analysis and PCA-based clustering revealed significant genotype-by-environment interactions, with certain genotypes like 'IPC 2019-05' exhibiting distinct variations under stress, because of extra early maturity. The study concludes that genotypes 'IPC 2014-55', 'IPC 2011-78', and 'IPC 2019-05' are promising candidates for breeding heat-tolerant chickpea. Correlation analysis indicated that selection of genotypes with high cell membrane stability, chlorophyll, high seed yield plant-1, and high pods plant-1 under heat stress environment are suitable for developing heat tolerant chickpeas.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.