Hayley Pye, David S Brettle, Caitríona Lyons, Fauve Versaevel, Erio Barale-Thomas, Kurt Zatloukal, Darren Treanor
{"title":"在数字组织病理学中使用质量检查和过程：来自Bigpicture联盟的初步调查。","authors":"Hayley Pye, David S Brettle, Caitríona Lyons, Fauve Versaevel, Erio Barale-Thomas, Kurt Zatloukal, Darren Treanor","doi":"10.1136/jcp-2024-210010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>In the end-to-end digital pathology workflow, variability can be introduced at each step, resulting in differences in the final image dataset. The effectiveness of quality control processes at each step of the workflow will impact the extent and relevance of this variability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To assess the maturity of whole slide imaging (WSI) quality processes for the whole digital pathology workflow, we conducted an online questionnaire across 19 digitally active members of the Bigpicture consortium.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A key finding was that a lower proportion of centres are implementing rigorous quality processes and checks processes at the post-scanning steps of the WSI workflow, such as 'digital reporting and display' (44%) and computational analysis (34%), when compared with pre-scanning steps such as 'pre-staining' (72%) and 'staining' (77%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This information allows us to identify priorities for quality improvement of the overall WSI workflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":15391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"691-696"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505092/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of quality checks and processes across digital histopathology: an initial survey from the Bigpicture consortium.\",\"authors\":\"Hayley Pye, David S Brettle, Caitríona Lyons, Fauve Versaevel, Erio Barale-Thomas, Kurt Zatloukal, Darren Treanor\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jcp-2024-210010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>In the end-to-end digital pathology workflow, variability can be introduced at each step, resulting in differences in the final image dataset. The effectiveness of quality control processes at each step of the workflow will impact the extent and relevance of this variability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To assess the maturity of whole slide imaging (WSI) quality processes for the whole digital pathology workflow, we conducted an online questionnaire across 19 digitally active members of the Bigpicture consortium.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A key finding was that a lower proportion of centres are implementing rigorous quality processes and checks processes at the post-scanning steps of the WSI workflow, such as 'digital reporting and display' (44%) and computational analysis (34%), when compared with pre-scanning steps such as 'pre-staining' (72%) and 'staining' (77%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This information allows us to identify priorities for quality improvement of the overall WSI workflow.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"691-696\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505092/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp-2024-210010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp-2024-210010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Use of quality checks and processes across digital histopathology: an initial survey from the Bigpicture consortium.
Aims: In the end-to-end digital pathology workflow, variability can be introduced at each step, resulting in differences in the final image dataset. The effectiveness of quality control processes at each step of the workflow will impact the extent and relevance of this variability.
Methods: To assess the maturity of whole slide imaging (WSI) quality processes for the whole digital pathology workflow, we conducted an online questionnaire across 19 digitally active members of the Bigpicture consortium.
Results: A key finding was that a lower proportion of centres are implementing rigorous quality processes and checks processes at the post-scanning steps of the WSI workflow, such as 'digital reporting and display' (44%) and computational analysis (34%), when compared with pre-scanning steps such as 'pre-staining' (72%) and 'staining' (77%).
Conclusions: This information allows us to identify priorities for quality improvement of the overall WSI workflow.
期刊介绍：
Journal of Clinical Pathology is a leading international journal covering all aspects of pathology. Diagnostic and research areas covered include histopathology, virology, haematology, microbiology, cytopathology, chemical pathology, molecular pathology, forensic pathology, dermatopathology, neuropathology and immunopathology. Each issue contains Reviews, Original articles, Short reports, Correspondence and more.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
