全身固定调节视-动相互作用。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Naoki Kuroda, Ryo Teraoka, Shinya Harada, Wataru Teramoto
{"title":"全身固定调节视-动相互作用。","authors":"Naoki Kuroda, Ryo Teraoka, Shinya Harada, Wataru Teramoto","doi":"10.1007/s00221-025-07129-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peripersonal space (PPS) is the space immediately around each body part. A previous study reported that hand-centered PPS shrank after hand immobilization; however, little is known about what happens in the PPS of other body parts. Here, we investigated the effect of whole-body immobilization on trunk-centered PPS by fixing the whole-body in a large box. Two experiments were conducted. Experiment 1 compared trunk-centered PPS with and without a large box. Experiment 2 manipulated the box size (large or small) to investigate the effects of box embodiment. Participants were tasked with responding as quickly as possible to a tactile stimulus on their chest while viewing a visual probe approaching from various distances. A visual facilitation effect in PPS was defined as the amount that the visual probe facilitated tactile detection in each distance condition. In addition, participants evaluated body immobilization under all conditions. The results showed that the visual facilitation effect on tactile detection was significantly greater in the with-box than in the without-box conditions in Experiment 1, and was significantly greater in the small box than in the large box conditions in Experiment 2. However, neither experiment clearly estimated PPS boundaries, although the visual probe located at farther distances had significantly less visual facilitation effect. Perceived body immobilization was stronger in the with-box than without-box conditions in Experiment 1 and was stronger in the small box than in the large box conditions in Experiment 2. These results suggest that body immobilization, rather than box embodiments, can induce stronger visuotactile interaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 8","pages":"186"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12255558/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whole-body immobilization modulates visuotactile interaction.\",\"authors\":\"Naoki Kuroda, Ryo Teraoka, Shinya Harada, Wataru Teramoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00221-025-07129-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Peripersonal space (PPS) is the space immediately around each body part. A previous study reported that hand-centered PPS shrank after hand immobilization; however, little is known about what happens in the PPS of other body parts. Here, we investigated the effect of whole-body immobilization on trunk-centered PPS by fixing the whole-body in a large box. Two experiments were conducted. Experiment 1 compared trunk-centered PPS with and without a large box. Experiment 2 manipulated the box size (large or small) to investigate the effects of box embodiment. Participants were tasked with responding as quickly as possible to a tactile stimulus on their chest while viewing a visual probe approaching from various distances. A visual facilitation effect in PPS was defined as the amount that the visual probe facilitated tactile detection in each distance condition. In addition, participants evaluated body immobilization under all conditions. The results showed that the visual facilitation effect on tactile detection was significantly greater in the with-box than in the without-box conditions in Experiment 1, and was significantly greater in the small box than in the large box conditions in Experiment 2. However, neither experiment clearly estimated PPS boundaries, although the visual probe located at farther distances had significantly less visual facilitation effect. Perceived body immobilization was stronger in the with-box than without-box conditions in Experiment 1 and was stronger in the small box than in the large box conditions in Experiment 2. These results suggest that body immobilization, rather than box embodiments, can induce stronger visuotactile interaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Brain Research\",\"volume\":\"243 8\",\"pages\":\"186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12255558/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07129-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07129-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

周围空间(PPS)是紧挨着身体各个部位的空间。先前的一项研究报告了手固定后,以手为中心的PPS缩小;然而,对于身体其他部位的PPS发生了什么,我们知之甚少。在此,我们通过将全身固定在一个大盒子中来研究全身固定对躯干为中心的PPS的影响。进行了两个实验。实验1比较了树干中心PPS有和没有大盒子的情况。实验2通过对盒子尺寸(大或小)的操纵来考察盒子体现的效果。参与者的任务是在观看从不同距离靠近的视觉探针的同时,尽可能快地对胸部的触觉刺激做出反应。视觉促进效应定义为视觉探针在每个距离条件下促进触觉检测的程度。此外,参与者在所有条件下评估身体固定。结果表明,实验1中有盒组的视觉促进作用显著大于无盒组,实验2中小盒组的视觉促进作用显著大于大盒组。然而,两个实验都没有明确估计PPS边界,尽管距离较远的视觉探针的视觉促进效果明显较差。实验1中有箱条件下的身体固定化知觉强于无箱条件,实验2中小箱条件下的身体固定化知觉强于大箱条件。这些结果表明,身体固定,而不是盒子实施,可以诱导更强的视觉-触觉相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Whole-body immobilization modulates visuotactile interaction.

Peripersonal space (PPS) is the space immediately around each body part. A previous study reported that hand-centered PPS shrank after hand immobilization; however, little is known about what happens in the PPS of other body parts. Here, we investigated the effect of whole-body immobilization on trunk-centered PPS by fixing the whole-body in a large box. Two experiments were conducted. Experiment 1 compared trunk-centered PPS with and without a large box. Experiment 2 manipulated the box size (large or small) to investigate the effects of box embodiment. Participants were tasked with responding as quickly as possible to a tactile stimulus on their chest while viewing a visual probe approaching from various distances. A visual facilitation effect in PPS was defined as the amount that the visual probe facilitated tactile detection in each distance condition. In addition, participants evaluated body immobilization under all conditions. The results showed that the visual facilitation effect on tactile detection was significantly greater in the with-box than in the without-box conditions in Experiment 1, and was significantly greater in the small box than in the large box conditions in Experiment 2. However, neither experiment clearly estimated PPS boundaries, although the visual probe located at farther distances had significantly less visual facilitation effect. Perceived body immobilization was stronger in the with-box than without-box conditions in Experiment 1 and was stronger in the small box than in the large box conditions in Experiment 2. These results suggest that body immobilization, rather than box embodiments, can induce stronger visuotactile interaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信