血管内超声(IVUS)在经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统分流(TIPS)创建中的应用:一项比较传统TIPS与IVUS引导TIPS的系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Pooya Torkian, Reza Talaie, Siobhan Flanagan, Ashkan Heshmatzadeh Behzadi
{"title":"血管内超声(IVUS)在经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统分流(TIPS)创建中的应用:一项比较传统TIPS与IVUS引导TIPS的系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Pooya Torkian, Reza Talaie, Siobhan Flanagan, Ashkan Heshmatzadeh Behzadi","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the clinical and procedural benefits of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided portal vein access during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (iTIPS) creation compared to the conventional TIPS (cTIPS) technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of Medline and Google Scholar through August 30, 2024, was conducted to identify retrospective studies comparing iTIPS and cTIPS. A total of six studies, involving 418 patients (180 undergoing iTIPS and 238 undergoing cTIPS), met inclusion criteria. Matched comparison groups were used to analyze outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technical success rates were similar between iTIPS and cTIPS groups. One study reported a significantly lower complication rate with iTIPS, while three studies found no differences in complications. Notably, iTIPS significantly reduced fluoroscopy time by 9.74 minutes (p < 0.001) and radiation exposure by 583.4 mGy (p < 0.001) compared to cTIPS. The total procedure time and portal venous access time were shorter by 21 minutes (p < 0.001) and 15.49 minutes (p < 0.001), respectively, with IVUS guidance. Additionally, contrast agent use was 69.62 cc lower (p < 0.001) in iTIPS cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although based on a limited number of studies, these findings support IVUS-guided TIPS as a superior technique for improving procedural efficiency and reducing radiation exposure, procedure times, and contrast agent usage without compromising success rates. Its benefits are particularly pronounced in patients with complex anatomy or heightened risk factors.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>IVUS-guided TIPS demonstrates potential procedural and safety advantages over conventional techniques, particularly in anatomically complex or high-risk patients. These findings support further investigation and prospective validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) in Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) Creation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Conventional TIPS with IVUS-Guided TIPS.\",\"authors\":\"Pooya Torkian, Reza Talaie, Siobhan Flanagan, Ashkan Heshmatzadeh Behzadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjr/tqaf158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the clinical and procedural benefits of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided portal vein access during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (iTIPS) creation compared to the conventional TIPS (cTIPS) technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of Medline and Google Scholar through August 30, 2024, was conducted to identify retrospective studies comparing iTIPS and cTIPS. A total of six studies, involving 418 patients (180 undergoing iTIPS and 238 undergoing cTIPS), met inclusion criteria. Matched comparison groups were used to analyze outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technical success rates were similar between iTIPS and cTIPS groups. One study reported a significantly lower complication rate with iTIPS, while three studies found no differences in complications. Notably, iTIPS significantly reduced fluoroscopy time by 9.74 minutes (p < 0.001) and radiation exposure by 583.4 mGy (p < 0.001) compared to cTIPS. The total procedure time and portal venous access time were shorter by 21 minutes (p < 0.001) and 15.49 minutes (p < 0.001), respectively, with IVUS guidance. Additionally, contrast agent use was 69.62 cc lower (p < 0.001) in iTIPS cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although based on a limited number of studies, these findings support IVUS-guided TIPS as a superior technique for improving procedural efficiency and reducing radiation exposure, procedure times, and contrast agent usage without compromising success rates. Its benefits are particularly pronounced in patients with complex anatomy or heightened risk factors.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>IVUS-guided TIPS demonstrates potential procedural and safety advantages over conventional techniques, particularly in anatomically complex or high-risk patients. These findings support further investigation and prospective validation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf158\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf158","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了经颈静脉肝内门静脉分流术(iTIPS)中血管内超声(IVUS)引导门静脉通路与传统TIPS (cTIPS)技术相比的临床和程序优势。方法:综合检索Medline和谷歌Scholar到2024年8月30日,以确定比较iTIPS和cTIPS的回顾性研究。共有6项研究,涉及418例患者(180例接受iTIPS, 238例接受cTIPS),符合纳入标准。采用匹配的对照组分析结果。结果:iTIPS组与cTIPS组技术成功率相似。一项研究报告了iTIPS的并发症发生率显著降低,而三项研究发现并发症没有差异。值得注意的是,iTIPS显着减少了9.74分钟的透视时间(p结论:尽管基于有限数量的研究,这些发现支持ivus引导的TIPS作为一种优越的技术,可以提高手术效率,减少辐射暴露,手术时间和造影剂的使用,而不会影响成功率。对于解剖结构复杂或危险因素较高的患者,其益处尤其明显。知识进展:ivus引导的TIPS与传统技术相比具有潜在的程序性和安全性优势,特别是在解剖复杂或高危患者中。这些发现支持进一步的调查和前瞻性验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) in Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) Creation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Conventional TIPS with IVUS-Guided TIPS.

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the clinical and procedural benefits of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided portal vein access during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (iTIPS) creation compared to the conventional TIPS (cTIPS) technique.

Methods: A comprehensive search of Medline and Google Scholar through August 30, 2024, was conducted to identify retrospective studies comparing iTIPS and cTIPS. A total of six studies, involving 418 patients (180 undergoing iTIPS and 238 undergoing cTIPS), met inclusion criteria. Matched comparison groups were used to analyze outcomes.

Results: Technical success rates were similar between iTIPS and cTIPS groups. One study reported a significantly lower complication rate with iTIPS, while three studies found no differences in complications. Notably, iTIPS significantly reduced fluoroscopy time by 9.74 minutes (p < 0.001) and radiation exposure by 583.4 mGy (p < 0.001) compared to cTIPS. The total procedure time and portal venous access time were shorter by 21 minutes (p < 0.001) and 15.49 minutes (p < 0.001), respectively, with IVUS guidance. Additionally, contrast agent use was 69.62 cc lower (p < 0.001) in iTIPS cases.

Conclusion: Although based on a limited number of studies, these findings support IVUS-guided TIPS as a superior technique for improving procedural efficiency and reducing radiation exposure, procedure times, and contrast agent usage without compromising success rates. Its benefits are particularly pronounced in patients with complex anatomy or heightened risk factors.

Advances in knowledge: IVUS-guided TIPS demonstrates potential procedural and safety advantages over conventional techniques, particularly in anatomically complex or high-risk patients. These findings support further investigation and prospective validation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信