Martijn Arns, Nolan Williams, Jonathan Downar, Aleksandra Dojnov, John Coetzee, Roberto Goya-Maldonado
{"title":"三叉神经刺激作为经颅磁刺激临床试验的半主动控制条件:来自心脑耦合和临床结果的证据。","authors":"Martijn Arns, Nolan Williams, Jonathan Downar, Aleksandra Dojnov, John Coetzee, Roberto Goya-Maldonado","doi":"10.1016/j.brs.2025.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The inertness of sham controls in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies, particularly those involving Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), remains controversial. Using heart-brain coupling (HBC) as a frontal-vagal engagement measure, we analyzed pilot data and data from two placebo-controlled accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) trials (combined N=100). Active-TMS induced significantly stronger HBC compared to sham in both studies, with the effect size for TENS-sham considerably attenuated, and significantly stronger HBC for TENS-sham relative to SAINT-sham (d=0.9). HBC in the TENS-sham group was associated with clinical improvement (d=1.12), reflecting antidepressant effects of trigeminal nerve stimulation. These findings suggest TENS-sham should be seen as a semi-active control condition, also controlling for trigeminal nerve stimulation, resulting in downstream vagal and cortical engagement and thus controlling for this non-specific effect of TMS. Future studies should be aware of this semi-active effect and conduct power-analyses accordingly, modifying the expected effect size. Furthermore, HBC could be used to titrate the intensity of TENS-stimulation to minimize semi-active effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":9206,"journal":{"name":"Brain Stimulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation as a Semi-Active Control Condition in TMS Clinical Trials: Evidence From Heart-Brain Coupling and Clinical Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Martijn Arns, Nolan Williams, Jonathan Downar, Aleksandra Dojnov, John Coetzee, Roberto Goya-Maldonado\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brs.2025.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The inertness of sham controls in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies, particularly those involving Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), remains controversial. Using heart-brain coupling (HBC) as a frontal-vagal engagement measure, we analyzed pilot data and data from two placebo-controlled accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) trials (combined N=100). Active-TMS induced significantly stronger HBC compared to sham in both studies, with the effect size for TENS-sham considerably attenuated, and significantly stronger HBC for TENS-sham relative to SAINT-sham (d=0.9). HBC in the TENS-sham group was associated with clinical improvement (d=1.12), reflecting antidepressant effects of trigeminal nerve stimulation. These findings suggest TENS-sham should be seen as a semi-active control condition, also controlling for trigeminal nerve stimulation, resulting in downstream vagal and cortical engagement and thus controlling for this non-specific effect of TMS. Future studies should be aware of this semi-active effect and conduct power-analyses accordingly, modifying the expected effect size. Furthermore, HBC could be used to titrate the intensity of TENS-stimulation to minimize semi-active effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Stimulation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Stimulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2025.07.004\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Stimulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2025.07.004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation as a Semi-Active Control Condition in TMS Clinical Trials: Evidence From Heart-Brain Coupling and Clinical Outcomes.
The inertness of sham controls in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies, particularly those involving Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), remains controversial. Using heart-brain coupling (HBC) as a frontal-vagal engagement measure, we analyzed pilot data and data from two placebo-controlled accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) trials (combined N=100). Active-TMS induced significantly stronger HBC compared to sham in both studies, with the effect size for TENS-sham considerably attenuated, and significantly stronger HBC for TENS-sham relative to SAINT-sham (d=0.9). HBC in the TENS-sham group was associated with clinical improvement (d=1.12), reflecting antidepressant effects of trigeminal nerve stimulation. These findings suggest TENS-sham should be seen as a semi-active control condition, also controlling for trigeminal nerve stimulation, resulting in downstream vagal and cortical engagement and thus controlling for this non-specific effect of TMS. Future studies should be aware of this semi-active effect and conduct power-analyses accordingly, modifying the expected effect size. Furthermore, HBC could be used to titrate the intensity of TENS-stimulation to minimize semi-active effects.
期刊介绍:
Brain Stimulation publishes on the entire field of brain stimulation, including noninvasive and invasive techniques and technologies that alter brain function through the use of electrical, magnetic, radiowave, or focally targeted pharmacologic stimulation.
Brain Stimulation aims to be the premier journal for publication of original research in the field of neuromodulation. The journal includes: a) Original articles; b) Short Communications; c) Invited and original reviews; d) Technology and methodological perspectives (reviews of new devices, description of new methods, etc.); and e) Letters to the Editor. Special issues of the journal will be considered based on scientific merit.