童年同伴受害与物质使用开始的时间:来自双胞胎研究的证据。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Li Hazel Yu, Kristine Marceau, Valerie S Knopik, Laura Baker
{"title":"童年同伴受害与物质使用开始的时间:来自双胞胎研究的证据。","authors":"Li Hazel Yu, Kristine Marceau, Valerie S Knopik, Laura Baker","doi":"10.1007/s10519-025-10222-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies robustly link childhood peer victimization experience to the timing of substance use initiation. However, no study has investigated the contributions of genetic and environmental factors to this link. The current study focused on a sample of 779 twin pairs followed from age 9-10 to 19-20, which is racially/ethnically and socioeconomically representative of the greater Los Angeles area. The aims were to investigate (1) the associations between childhood victimization, including physical (e.g., kicking, pushing), verbal (e.g., taunting), and relational victimization (e.g., spreading rumors), and timing of substance use initiation, and (2) the contributions of genetic/environmental factors to these associations. Multinomial logistic regressions revealed several small associations, but none of these survived corrections for multiple testing. Univariate genetic models suggested genetic (A) and nonshared environmental influences (E) on verbal victimization (V<sub>A</sub> = .43, V<sub>E</sub> = .57), shared environmental (C) and nonshared environmental factors on relational victimization (V<sub>C</sub> = .22, V<sub>E</sub> = .78), and ambiguous familial influences and E on physical victimization (V<sub>A</sub> = .34, V<sub>E</sub> = .66; V<sub>C</sub> = .26, V<sub>E</sub> = .74). Timing of cigarette initiation were explained by A, C, and E (V<sub>A</sub> = .48, V<sub>C</sub> = .31, V<sub>E</sub> = .21). Quantitative sex differences in contributions of A, C, and E were detected for alcohol (V<sub>AM</sub> = .90, V<sub>EM</sub> = .10; V<sub>CF</sub> = .86, V<sub>EF</sub> = .14) and marijuana initiation (V<sub>AM</sub> = .89, V<sub>EM</sub> = .11; V<sub>CF</sub> = .79, V<sub>EF</sub> = .21); however, A could be dropped for females and C could be dropped for males across both variables. Multivariate twin analyses were not feasible, due to the low cross-trait correlations. These findings call into question the robustness of links between self-reported victimization in childhood and prospectively measured timing of substance initiation across adolescence.</p>","PeriodicalId":8715,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peer Victimization in Childhood and Timing of Substance Use Initiation: Evidence from a Twin Study.\",\"authors\":\"Li Hazel Yu, Kristine Marceau, Valerie S Knopik, Laura Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10519-025-10222-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous studies robustly link childhood peer victimization experience to the timing of substance use initiation. However, no study has investigated the contributions of genetic and environmental factors to this link. The current study focused on a sample of 779 twin pairs followed from age 9-10 to 19-20, which is racially/ethnically and socioeconomically representative of the greater Los Angeles area. The aims were to investigate (1) the associations between childhood victimization, including physical (e.g., kicking, pushing), verbal (e.g., taunting), and relational victimization (e.g., spreading rumors), and timing of substance use initiation, and (2) the contributions of genetic/environmental factors to these associations. Multinomial logistic regressions revealed several small associations, but none of these survived corrections for multiple testing. Univariate genetic models suggested genetic (A) and nonshared environmental influences (E) on verbal victimization (V<sub>A</sub> = .43, V<sub>E</sub> = .57), shared environmental (C) and nonshared environmental factors on relational victimization (V<sub>C</sub> = .22, V<sub>E</sub> = .78), and ambiguous familial influences and E on physical victimization (V<sub>A</sub> = .34, V<sub>E</sub> = .66; V<sub>C</sub> = .26, V<sub>E</sub> = .74). Timing of cigarette initiation were explained by A, C, and E (V<sub>A</sub> = .48, V<sub>C</sub> = .31, V<sub>E</sub> = .21). Quantitative sex differences in contributions of A, C, and E were detected for alcohol (V<sub>AM</sub> = .90, V<sub>EM</sub> = .10; V<sub>CF</sub> = .86, V<sub>EF</sub> = .14) and marijuana initiation (V<sub>AM</sub> = .89, V<sub>EM</sub> = .11; V<sub>CF</sub> = .79, V<sub>EF</sub> = .21); however, A could be dropped for females and C could be dropped for males across both variables. Multivariate twin analyses were not feasible, due to the low cross-trait correlations. These findings call into question the robustness of links between self-reported victimization in childhood and prospectively measured timing of substance initiation across adolescence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavior Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavior Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-025-10222-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-025-10222-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究强有力地将童年同伴受害经历与物质使用开始的时间联系起来。然而,没有研究调查遗传和环境因素对这种联系的贡献。目前的研究集中在779对年龄在9-10岁到19-20岁之间的双胞胎样本上,这些双胞胎在种族/民族和社会经济上都是大洛杉矶地区的代表。目的是调查(1)儿童受害行为(包括身体上的(如踢、推)、言语上的(如嘲弄)和关系上的(如散布谣言)与物质使用开始的时间之间的联系,以及(2)遗传/环境因素对这些联系的贡献。多项逻辑回归揭示了几个小的关联,但这些都没有经过多次检验的修正。单变量遗传模型表明遗传(A)和非共享环境影响(E)对言语伤害(VA =)有影响。43, VE = .57),共享环境(C)和非共享环境因素对关系受害的影响(VC = .57)。22, VE = .78),而家庭影响和E对身体伤害的影响不明确(VA =。34, ve = .66;vc =。26, ve = .74)。卷烟起始时间由A、C和E解释(VA =)。48、vc =。31, ve = .21)。检测了酒精中A、C和E的定量性别差异(VAM =)。90, vem = .10;vcf =。86, VEF = .14)和大麻起始(VAM = .14)。89, vem = 0.11;vcf =。79, vef = .21);然而,在这两个变量中,女性可以去掉A,男性可以去掉C。由于低交叉性状相关性,多变量双生分析不可行。这些发现对童年自我报告的受害与青春期物质起始时间的前瞻性测量之间的联系的稳健性提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peer Victimization in Childhood and Timing of Substance Use Initiation: Evidence from a Twin Study.

Previous studies robustly link childhood peer victimization experience to the timing of substance use initiation. However, no study has investigated the contributions of genetic and environmental factors to this link. The current study focused on a sample of 779 twin pairs followed from age 9-10 to 19-20, which is racially/ethnically and socioeconomically representative of the greater Los Angeles area. The aims were to investigate (1) the associations between childhood victimization, including physical (e.g., kicking, pushing), verbal (e.g., taunting), and relational victimization (e.g., spreading rumors), and timing of substance use initiation, and (2) the contributions of genetic/environmental factors to these associations. Multinomial logistic regressions revealed several small associations, but none of these survived corrections for multiple testing. Univariate genetic models suggested genetic (A) and nonshared environmental influences (E) on verbal victimization (VA = .43, VE = .57), shared environmental (C) and nonshared environmental factors on relational victimization (VC = .22, VE = .78), and ambiguous familial influences and E on physical victimization (VA = .34, VE = .66; VC = .26, VE = .74). Timing of cigarette initiation were explained by A, C, and E (VA = .48, VC = .31, VE = .21). Quantitative sex differences in contributions of A, C, and E were detected for alcohol (VAM = .90, VEM = .10; VCF = .86, VEF = .14) and marijuana initiation (VAM = .89, VEM = .11; VCF = .79, VEF = .21); however, A could be dropped for females and C could be dropped for males across both variables. Multivariate twin analyses were not feasible, due to the low cross-trait correlations. These findings call into question the robustness of links between self-reported victimization in childhood and prospectively measured timing of substance initiation across adolescence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavior Genetics
Behavior Genetics 生物-行为科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
30
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavior Genetics - the leading journal concerned with the genetic analysis of complex traits - is published in cooperation with the Behavior Genetics Association. This timely journal disseminates the most current original research on the inheritance and evolution of behavioral characteristics in man and other species. Contributions from eminent international researchers focus on both the application of various genetic perspectives to the study of behavioral characteristics and the influence of behavioral differences on the genetic structure of populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信