线性与非线性教学法对举重动作探索的影响。

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Acta Psychologica Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-10 DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105212
Riki S Lindsay, John Komar, Jia Yi Chow, Aden Kittel, Paul Larkin, Michael Spittle
{"title":"线性与非线性教学法对举重动作探索的影响。","authors":"Riki S Lindsay, John Komar, Jia Yi Chow, Aden Kittel, Paul Larkin, Michael Spittle","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The influence of linear and nonlinear pedagogies on movement exploration of a weightlifting skillTraditional linear pedagogy (LP) is frequently criticised for being overly restrictive and limiting the development of individualised movement solutions. This has led to the recommendation of less restrained approaches, such as nonlinear pedagogy, to foster broad, self-organised movement exploration. However, limited research has investigated the nature of exploration strategies between LP and NLP approaches. This study aimed to investigate the dynamics of exploration under LP and NLP approaches. A four-week intervention involving 16 novice weightlifters demonstrated that NLP and LP facilitated similar performance outcomes, challenging the assumption that structured approaches inhibit movement exploration. Cluster analyses revealed that NLP enabled broader exploration, while LP narrowed exploration to certain movements. Interestingly, even within LP's structured limits, participants exhibited meaningful adaptive behaviour through minor movement adjustments. A significant interaction between exploration and learning was observed under NLP, indicating that exploration plays a functional role in performance improvement. These findings suggest that contrary to previous research, linear pedagogies do not necessarily deny learners the opportunity to exploit functional movement variability during the learning process. This research offers new insights into the nuanced interplay between exploration and adaptation when engaged in different learning approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"258 ","pages":"105212"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of linear and nonlinear pedagogies on movement exploration of a weightlifting skill.\",\"authors\":\"Riki S Lindsay, John Komar, Jia Yi Chow, Aden Kittel, Paul Larkin, Michael Spittle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The influence of linear and nonlinear pedagogies on movement exploration of a weightlifting skillTraditional linear pedagogy (LP) is frequently criticised for being overly restrictive and limiting the development of individualised movement solutions. This has led to the recommendation of less restrained approaches, such as nonlinear pedagogy, to foster broad, self-organised movement exploration. However, limited research has investigated the nature of exploration strategies between LP and NLP approaches. This study aimed to investigate the dynamics of exploration under LP and NLP approaches. A four-week intervention involving 16 novice weightlifters demonstrated that NLP and LP facilitated similar performance outcomes, challenging the assumption that structured approaches inhibit movement exploration. Cluster analyses revealed that NLP enabled broader exploration, while LP narrowed exploration to certain movements. Interestingly, even within LP's structured limits, participants exhibited meaningful adaptive behaviour through minor movement adjustments. A significant interaction between exploration and learning was observed under NLP, indicating that exploration plays a functional role in performance improvement. These findings suggest that contrary to previous research, linear pedagogies do not necessarily deny learners the opportunity to exploit functional movement variability during the learning process. This research offers new insights into the nuanced interplay between exploration and adaptation when engaged in different learning approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"volume\":\"258 \",\"pages\":\"105212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105212\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105212","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统的线性教学法(LP)经常被批评为过于严格,限制了个性化运动解决方案的发展。这导致了推荐较少限制的方法,如非线性教学法,以促进广泛的,自组织的运动探索。然而,有限的研究调查了LP和NLP方法之间勘探策略的本质。本研究旨在探讨LP和NLP方法下的勘探动态。一项涉及16名举重新手的为期四周的干预表明,NLP和LP促进了相似的表现结果,挑战了结构化方法抑制运动探索的假设。聚类分析表明,NLP可以实现更广泛的勘探,而LP则将勘探范围缩小到某些运动。有趣的是,即使在LP的结构限制内,参与者通过轻微的动作调整表现出有意义的适应行为。在NLP下,探索与学习之间存在显著的交互作用,表明探索在绩效提高中起着功能性作用。这些发现表明,与之前的研究相反,线性教学法并不一定会剥夺学习者在学习过程中利用功能运动变异性的机会。这项研究为探索和适应在不同学习方法中的微妙相互作用提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of linear and nonlinear pedagogies on movement exploration of a weightlifting skill.

The influence of linear and nonlinear pedagogies on movement exploration of a weightlifting skillTraditional linear pedagogy (LP) is frequently criticised for being overly restrictive and limiting the development of individualised movement solutions. This has led to the recommendation of less restrained approaches, such as nonlinear pedagogy, to foster broad, self-organised movement exploration. However, limited research has investigated the nature of exploration strategies between LP and NLP approaches. This study aimed to investigate the dynamics of exploration under LP and NLP approaches. A four-week intervention involving 16 novice weightlifters demonstrated that NLP and LP facilitated similar performance outcomes, challenging the assumption that structured approaches inhibit movement exploration. Cluster analyses revealed that NLP enabled broader exploration, while LP narrowed exploration to certain movements. Interestingly, even within LP's structured limits, participants exhibited meaningful adaptive behaviour through minor movement adjustments. A significant interaction between exploration and learning was observed under NLP, indicating that exploration plays a functional role in performance improvement. These findings suggest that contrary to previous research, linear pedagogies do not necessarily deny learners the opportunity to exploit functional movement variability during the learning process. This research offers new insights into the nuanced interplay between exploration and adaptation when engaged in different learning approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信