为检验医学和病理学建立全面的人工智能生命周期框架:系列介绍。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Christopher A Garcia, Katelyn A Reed, Eric Lantz, Patrick Day, Mark D Zarella, Steven N Hart, Eric Will, John G Skiffington, Melinda Rice, Debra A Novak, David S McClintock
{"title":"为检验医学和病理学建立全面的人工智能生命周期框架:系列介绍。","authors":"Christopher A Garcia, Katelyn A Reed, Eric Lantz, Patrick Day, Mark D Zarella, Steven N Hart, Eric Will, John G Skiffington, Melinda Rice, Debra A Novak, David S McClintock","doi":"10.1093/ajcp/aqaf069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite exponential growth in artificial intelligence (AI) research for laboratory medicine and pathology, a significant gap exists between model development and clinical AI implementation. This article introduces a structured framework, the Clinical AI Readiness Evaluator (CARE), to bridge this gap and support the responsible adoption of AI in clinical laboratory settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Building upon the Machine Learning Technology Readiness Levels framework, we developed CARE specifically for the clinical laboratory environment by incorporating health care-specific requirements, regulatory considerations, and workflow integration needs. This framework was iteratively refined through practical application across diverse AI use cases within laboratory medicine and pathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CARE framework provides a systematic approach to AI development and implementation through 8 component workstreams: clinical use case, data, data pipeline, code, clinical user experience, clinical technology infrastructure, clinical orchestration, and regulatory compliance. Unlike generic AI frameworks, CARE distinguishes itself by emphasizing both health care and laboratory workflow integration, regulatory requirements, ethical considerations, and comprehensive validation for clinical contexts. The framework accommodates both internally developed models and commercial AI solutions, providing clear guidance through technology readiness levels and structured review processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CARE framework addresses the unique challenges of implementing AI in laboratory medicine and pathology by providing a comprehensive roadmap from initial concepts through clinical deployment and maintenance. This article, the first in a series of 4, establishes the foundational AI lifecycle framework, while subsequent articles will explore data documentation, ethical AI considerations, and governance structures. By adopting this structured approach, laboratories can responsibly harness AI's potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and operational efficiencies and, ultimately, improve patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7506,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing a comprehensive artificial intelligence lifecycle framework for laboratory medicine and pathology: A series introduction.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher A Garcia, Katelyn A Reed, Eric Lantz, Patrick Day, Mark D Zarella, Steven N Hart, Eric Will, John G Skiffington, Melinda Rice, Debra A Novak, David S McClintock\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ajcp/aqaf069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite exponential growth in artificial intelligence (AI) research for laboratory medicine and pathology, a significant gap exists between model development and clinical AI implementation. This article introduces a structured framework, the Clinical AI Readiness Evaluator (CARE), to bridge this gap and support the responsible adoption of AI in clinical laboratory settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Building upon the Machine Learning Technology Readiness Levels framework, we developed CARE specifically for the clinical laboratory environment by incorporating health care-specific requirements, regulatory considerations, and workflow integration needs. This framework was iteratively refined through practical application across diverse AI use cases within laboratory medicine and pathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CARE framework provides a systematic approach to AI development and implementation through 8 component workstreams: clinical use case, data, data pipeline, code, clinical user experience, clinical technology infrastructure, clinical orchestration, and regulatory compliance. Unlike generic AI frameworks, CARE distinguishes itself by emphasizing both health care and laboratory workflow integration, regulatory requirements, ethical considerations, and comprehensive validation for clinical contexts. The framework accommodates both internally developed models and commercial AI solutions, providing clear guidance through technology readiness levels and structured review processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CARE framework addresses the unique challenges of implementing AI in laboratory medicine and pathology by providing a comprehensive roadmap from initial concepts through clinical deployment and maintenance. This article, the first in a series of 4, establishes the foundational AI lifecycle framework, while subsequent articles will explore data documentation, ethical AI considerations, and governance structures. By adopting this structured approach, laboratories can responsibly harness AI's potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and operational efficiencies and, ultimately, improve patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of clinical pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of clinical pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaf069\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaf069","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管人工智能(AI)在检验医学和病理学方面的研究呈指数级增长,但在模型开发和临床人工智能实施之间存在显著差距。本文介绍了一个结构化框架,即临床人工智能准备评估器(CARE),以弥合这一差距,并支持在临床实验室环境中负责任地采用人工智能。方法:在机器学习技术准备水平框架的基础上,我们通过结合医疗保健特定要求、监管考虑和工作流程集成需求,专门为临床实验室环境开发了CARE。通过实验室医学和病理学中不同人工智能用例的实际应用,该框架得到了迭代改进。结果:CARE框架通过8个组成工作流为AI的开发和实施提供了系统的方法:临床用例、数据、数据管道、代码、临床用户体验、临床技术基础设施、临床编排和法规遵从性。与一般的人工智能框架不同,CARE的区别在于强调卫生保健和实验室工作流程的整合、监管要求、伦理考虑和临床环境的全面验证。该框架可容纳内部开发的模型和商业人工智能解决方案,通过技术准备水平和结构化审查过程提供清晰的指导。结论:CARE框架通过提供从最初概念到临床部署和维护的全面路线图,解决了在检验医学和病理学中实施人工智能的独特挑战。本文是四篇系列文章中的第一篇,建立了基本的人工智能生命周期框架,而后续文章将探索数据文档、人工智能伦理考虑和治理结构。通过采用这种结构化方法,实验室可以负责任地利用人工智能的潜力,提高诊断准确性和操作效率,并最终改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishing a comprehensive artificial intelligence lifecycle framework for laboratory medicine and pathology: A series introduction.

Objective: Despite exponential growth in artificial intelligence (AI) research for laboratory medicine and pathology, a significant gap exists between model development and clinical AI implementation. This article introduces a structured framework, the Clinical AI Readiness Evaluator (CARE), to bridge this gap and support the responsible adoption of AI in clinical laboratory settings.

Methods: Building upon the Machine Learning Technology Readiness Levels framework, we developed CARE specifically for the clinical laboratory environment by incorporating health care-specific requirements, regulatory considerations, and workflow integration needs. This framework was iteratively refined through practical application across diverse AI use cases within laboratory medicine and pathology.

Results: The CARE framework provides a systematic approach to AI development and implementation through 8 component workstreams: clinical use case, data, data pipeline, code, clinical user experience, clinical technology infrastructure, clinical orchestration, and regulatory compliance. Unlike generic AI frameworks, CARE distinguishes itself by emphasizing both health care and laboratory workflow integration, regulatory requirements, ethical considerations, and comprehensive validation for clinical contexts. The framework accommodates both internally developed models and commercial AI solutions, providing clear guidance through technology readiness levels and structured review processes.

Conclusions: The CARE framework addresses the unique challenges of implementing AI in laboratory medicine and pathology by providing a comprehensive roadmap from initial concepts through clinical deployment and maintenance. This article, the first in a series of 4, establishes the foundational AI lifecycle framework, while subsequent articles will explore data documentation, ethical AI considerations, and governance structures. By adopting this structured approach, laboratories can responsibly harness AI's potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and operational efficiencies and, ultimately, improve patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Clinical Pathology (AJCP) is the official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pathology and the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists. It is a leading international journal for publication of articles concerning novel anatomic pathology and laboratory medicine observations on human disease. AJCP emphasizes articles that focus on the application of evolving technologies for the diagnosis and characterization of diseases and conditions, as well as those that have a direct link toward improving patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信