评估能源相关二氧化碳排放中LMDI技术选择周期的计算复杂性:一种替代方法

IF 3.5 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Juan David Rivera-Niquepa, Jose M. Yusta, Paulo M. De Oliveira-De Jesus
{"title":"评估能源相关二氧化碳排放中LMDI技术选择周期的计算复杂性:一种替代方法","authors":"Juan David Rivera-Niquepa,&nbsp;Jose M. Yusta,&nbsp;Paulo M. De Oliveira-De Jesus","doi":"10.1002/ese3.70187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) decomposition analysis is widely employed to examine the drivers behind changes in carbon dioxide emissions related to energy consumption. This analysis has been applied using single-period, year-by-year, and multi-period time frames worldwide. However, these time frames often overlook trend changes in carbon emission time series, which may lead to inaccurate and biased identification of driving factors. This study replicates previous findings and proposes a novel multi-period methodology for defining time frames in decomposition analysis. The proposed approach addresses the limitations of traditional methods by accounting for trend changes in the time series and performing an exhaustive search to optimally identify the most suitable time frames for LMDI-based decomposition. The methodology comprises two stages: the first generates an exhaustive list of possible time series partitions, and the second determines the optimal partition by minimizing the total mean square error (TMSE) using sequential linear models. The results, supported by computational performance tests, demonstrate that the proposed method effectively identifies optimal time frame definitions, making it particularly suitable for annualized case studies on carbon dioxide emissions decomposition in the context of the energy transition.</p>","PeriodicalId":11673,"journal":{"name":"Energy Science & Engineering","volume":"13 7","pages":"3464-3472"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.70187","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Computational Complexity in Selecting Periods for LMDI Techniques in Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions: An Alternative Approach\",\"authors\":\"Juan David Rivera-Niquepa,&nbsp;Jose M. Yusta,&nbsp;Paulo M. De Oliveira-De Jesus\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ese3.70187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) decomposition analysis is widely employed to examine the drivers behind changes in carbon dioxide emissions related to energy consumption. This analysis has been applied using single-period, year-by-year, and multi-period time frames worldwide. However, these time frames often overlook trend changes in carbon emission time series, which may lead to inaccurate and biased identification of driving factors. This study replicates previous findings and proposes a novel multi-period methodology for defining time frames in decomposition analysis. The proposed approach addresses the limitations of traditional methods by accounting for trend changes in the time series and performing an exhaustive search to optimally identify the most suitable time frames for LMDI-based decomposition. The methodology comprises two stages: the first generates an exhaustive list of possible time series partitions, and the second determines the optimal partition by minimizing the total mean square error (TMSE) using sequential linear models. The results, supported by computational performance tests, demonstrate that the proposed method effectively identifies optimal time frame definitions, making it particularly suitable for annualized case studies on carbon dioxide emissions decomposition in the context of the energy transition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Science & Engineering\",\"volume\":\"13 7\",\"pages\":\"3464-3472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.70187\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Science & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.70187\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.70187","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对数平均分割指数(LMDI)分解分析被广泛用于研究与能源消耗相关的二氧化碳排放变化背后的驱动因素。该分析已在全球范围内应用于单期、逐年和多期时间框架。然而,这些时间框架往往忽略了碳排放时间序列的趋势变化,这可能导致对驱动因素的不准确和有偏见的识别。本研究重复了以前的发现,并提出了一种新的多时期方法来定义分解分析中的时间框架。提出的方法解决了传统方法的局限性,考虑了时间序列的趋势变化,并进行了详尽的搜索,以最佳地确定最适合基于lmi的分解的时间框架。该方法包括两个阶段:第一阶段生成可能的时间序列分区的详尽列表,第二阶段通过使用顺序线性模型最小化总均方误差(TMSE)来确定最佳分区。计算性能测试的结果表明,所提出的方法有效地确定了最佳时间框架定义,使其特别适用于能源转型背景下二氧化碳排放分解的年度案例研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing Computational Complexity in Selecting Periods for LMDI Techniques in Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions: An Alternative Approach

Assessing Computational Complexity in Selecting Periods for LMDI Techniques in Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions: An Alternative Approach

The Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) decomposition analysis is widely employed to examine the drivers behind changes in carbon dioxide emissions related to energy consumption. This analysis has been applied using single-period, year-by-year, and multi-period time frames worldwide. However, these time frames often overlook trend changes in carbon emission time series, which may lead to inaccurate and biased identification of driving factors. This study replicates previous findings and proposes a novel multi-period methodology for defining time frames in decomposition analysis. The proposed approach addresses the limitations of traditional methods by accounting for trend changes in the time series and performing an exhaustive search to optimally identify the most suitable time frames for LMDI-based decomposition. The methodology comprises two stages: the first generates an exhaustive list of possible time series partitions, and the second determines the optimal partition by minimizing the total mean square error (TMSE) using sequential linear models. The results, supported by computational performance tests, demonstrate that the proposed method effectively identifies optimal time frame definitions, making it particularly suitable for annualized case studies on carbon dioxide emissions decomposition in the context of the energy transition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Science & Engineering
Energy Science & Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
298
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Science & Engineering is a peer reviewed, open access journal dedicated to fundamental and applied research on energy and supply and use. Published as a co-operative venture of Wiley and SCI (Society of Chemical Industry), the journal offers authors a fast route to publication and the ability to share their research with the widest possible audience of scientists, professionals and other interested people across the globe. Securing an affordable and low carbon energy supply is a critical challenge of the 21st century and the solutions will require collaboration between scientists and engineers worldwide. This new journal aims to facilitate collaboration and spark innovation in energy research and development. Due to the importance of this topic to society and economic development the journal will give priority to quality research papers that are accessible to a broad readership and discuss sustainable, state-of-the art approaches to shaping the future of energy. This multidisciplinary journal will appeal to all researchers and professionals working in any area of energy in academia, industry or government, including scientists, engineers, consultants, policy-makers, government officials, economists and corporate organisations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信