Juan David Rivera-Niquepa, Jose M. Yusta, Paulo M. De Oliveira-De Jesus
{"title":"评估能源相关二氧化碳排放中LMDI技术选择周期的计算复杂性:一种替代方法","authors":"Juan David Rivera-Niquepa, Jose M. Yusta, Paulo M. De Oliveira-De Jesus","doi":"10.1002/ese3.70187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) decomposition analysis is widely employed to examine the drivers behind changes in carbon dioxide emissions related to energy consumption. This analysis has been applied using single-period, year-by-year, and multi-period time frames worldwide. However, these time frames often overlook trend changes in carbon emission time series, which may lead to inaccurate and biased identification of driving factors. This study replicates previous findings and proposes a novel multi-period methodology for defining time frames in decomposition analysis. The proposed approach addresses the limitations of traditional methods by accounting for trend changes in the time series and performing an exhaustive search to optimally identify the most suitable time frames for LMDI-based decomposition. The methodology comprises two stages: the first generates an exhaustive list of possible time series partitions, and the second determines the optimal partition by minimizing the total mean square error (TMSE) using sequential linear models. The results, supported by computational performance tests, demonstrate that the proposed method effectively identifies optimal time frame definitions, making it particularly suitable for annualized case studies on carbon dioxide emissions decomposition in the context of the energy transition.</p>","PeriodicalId":11673,"journal":{"name":"Energy Science & Engineering","volume":"13 7","pages":"3464-3472"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.70187","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Computational Complexity in Selecting Periods for LMDI Techniques in Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions: An Alternative Approach\",\"authors\":\"Juan David Rivera-Niquepa, Jose M. Yusta, Paulo M. De Oliveira-De Jesus\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ese3.70187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) decomposition analysis is widely employed to examine the drivers behind changes in carbon dioxide emissions related to energy consumption. This analysis has been applied using single-period, year-by-year, and multi-period time frames worldwide. However, these time frames often overlook trend changes in carbon emission time series, which may lead to inaccurate and biased identification of driving factors. This study replicates previous findings and proposes a novel multi-period methodology for defining time frames in decomposition analysis. The proposed approach addresses the limitations of traditional methods by accounting for trend changes in the time series and performing an exhaustive search to optimally identify the most suitable time frames for LMDI-based decomposition. The methodology comprises two stages: the first generates an exhaustive list of possible time series partitions, and the second determines the optimal partition by minimizing the total mean square error (TMSE) using sequential linear models. The results, supported by computational performance tests, demonstrate that the proposed method effectively identifies optimal time frame definitions, making it particularly suitable for annualized case studies on carbon dioxide emissions decomposition in the context of the energy transition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Science & Engineering\",\"volume\":\"13 7\",\"pages\":\"3464-3472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.70187\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Science & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.70187\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.70187","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing Computational Complexity in Selecting Periods for LMDI Techniques in Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions: An Alternative Approach
The Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) decomposition analysis is widely employed to examine the drivers behind changes in carbon dioxide emissions related to energy consumption. This analysis has been applied using single-period, year-by-year, and multi-period time frames worldwide. However, these time frames often overlook trend changes in carbon emission time series, which may lead to inaccurate and biased identification of driving factors. This study replicates previous findings and proposes a novel multi-period methodology for defining time frames in decomposition analysis. The proposed approach addresses the limitations of traditional methods by accounting for trend changes in the time series and performing an exhaustive search to optimally identify the most suitable time frames for LMDI-based decomposition. The methodology comprises two stages: the first generates an exhaustive list of possible time series partitions, and the second determines the optimal partition by minimizing the total mean square error (TMSE) using sequential linear models. The results, supported by computational performance tests, demonstrate that the proposed method effectively identifies optimal time frame definitions, making it particularly suitable for annualized case studies on carbon dioxide emissions decomposition in the context of the energy transition.
期刊介绍:
Energy Science & Engineering is a peer reviewed, open access journal dedicated to fundamental and applied research on energy and supply and use. Published as a co-operative venture of Wiley and SCI (Society of Chemical Industry), the journal offers authors a fast route to publication and the ability to share their research with the widest possible audience of scientists, professionals and other interested people across the globe. Securing an affordable and low carbon energy supply is a critical challenge of the 21st century and the solutions will require collaboration between scientists and engineers worldwide. This new journal aims to facilitate collaboration and spark innovation in energy research and development. Due to the importance of this topic to society and economic development the journal will give priority to quality research papers that are accessible to a broad readership and discuss sustainable, state-of-the art approaches to shaping the future of energy. This multidisciplinary journal will appeal to all researchers and professionals working in any area of energy in academia, industry or government, including scientists, engineers, consultants, policy-makers, government officials, economists and corporate organisations.