Jae Kyun Park, Ji Young Hwang, Soyoung Bang, Yunmi Jeon, Min Kyoung Kim, Ji Won Kim, Woo Sik Lee
{"title":"温后培养时间和囊胚形态对玻璃化温循环中生殖结果的影响:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Jae Kyun Park, Ji Young Hwang, Soyoung Bang, Yunmi Jeon, Min Kyoung Kim, Ji Won Kim, Woo Sik Lee","doi":"10.1111/jog.16357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The use of vitrified–warmed blastocyst transfer (VBT) cycles has increased significantly. This study aimed to investigate the effects of the post-warming culture duration and blastocyst morphology on clinical outcomes in VBT cycles.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1551 VBT cycles. After propensity score matching to adjust for confounding variables, cycles were categorized based on post-warming culture duration into short-period (SPC; <i>n</i> = 365) and long-period (LPC; <i>n</i> = 730) culture groups. Blastocysts were classified into good (GG; <i>n</i> = 413) and poor morphological grade (PG; <i>n</i> = 289) groups. Clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates were compared between groups to assess correlations with culture duration and morphological quality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the GG group, post-warming culture duration was not significantly associated with survival, clinical pregnancy, implantation, ongoing pregnancy, or miscarriage rates for both single and double embryo transfers. However, in the PG group, the miscarriage rate was significantly higher in the SPC group than in the LPC group (26.7% vs. 2.6%). Furthermore, the SPC-PG group showed increased vulnerability in embryonic markers (positive markers: 82.5% vs. 69.5%; negative markers: 17.5% vs. 30.5%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, no statistically significant differences were observed in clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates between the SPC and LPC groups. These findings suggest that while the timing of embryo transfer (ET) after warming can be adjusted to optimize each laboratory's workflow, the primary determinant of ET strategy should be blastocyst morphology, with culture duration tailored accordingly.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","volume":"51 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of post-warming culture duration and blastocyst morphology on reproductive outcomes in vitrified–warmed cycles: A retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Jae Kyun Park, Ji Young Hwang, Soyoung Bang, Yunmi Jeon, Min Kyoung Kim, Ji Won Kim, Woo Sik Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jog.16357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>The use of vitrified–warmed blastocyst transfer (VBT) cycles has increased significantly. This study aimed to investigate the effects of the post-warming culture duration and blastocyst morphology on clinical outcomes in VBT cycles.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1551 VBT cycles. After propensity score matching to adjust for confounding variables, cycles were categorized based on post-warming culture duration into short-period (SPC; <i>n</i> = 365) and long-period (LPC; <i>n</i> = 730) culture groups. Blastocysts were classified into good (GG; <i>n</i> = 413) and poor morphological grade (PG; <i>n</i> = 289) groups. Clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates were compared between groups to assess correlations with culture duration and morphological quality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the GG group, post-warming culture duration was not significantly associated with survival, clinical pregnancy, implantation, ongoing pregnancy, or miscarriage rates for both single and double embryo transfers. However, in the PG group, the miscarriage rate was significantly higher in the SPC group than in the LPC group (26.7% vs. 2.6%). Furthermore, the SPC-PG group showed increased vulnerability in embryonic markers (positive markers: 82.5% vs. 69.5%; negative markers: 17.5% vs. 30.5%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Overall, no statistically significant differences were observed in clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates between the SPC and LPC groups. These findings suggest that while the timing of embryo transfer (ET) after warming can be adjusted to optimize each laboratory's workflow, the primary determinant of ET strategy should be blastocyst morphology, with culture duration tailored accordingly.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research\",\"volume\":\"51 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.16357\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.16357","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of post-warming culture duration and blastocyst morphology on reproductive outcomes in vitrified–warmed cycles: A retrospective cohort study
Aim
The use of vitrified–warmed blastocyst transfer (VBT) cycles has increased significantly. This study aimed to investigate the effects of the post-warming culture duration and blastocyst morphology on clinical outcomes in VBT cycles.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1551 VBT cycles. After propensity score matching to adjust for confounding variables, cycles were categorized based on post-warming culture duration into short-period (SPC; n = 365) and long-period (LPC; n = 730) culture groups. Blastocysts were classified into good (GG; n = 413) and poor morphological grade (PG; n = 289) groups. Clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates were compared between groups to assess correlations with culture duration and morphological quality.
Results
In the GG group, post-warming culture duration was not significantly associated with survival, clinical pregnancy, implantation, ongoing pregnancy, or miscarriage rates for both single and double embryo transfers. However, in the PG group, the miscarriage rate was significantly higher in the SPC group than in the LPC group (26.7% vs. 2.6%). Furthermore, the SPC-PG group showed increased vulnerability in embryonic markers (positive markers: 82.5% vs. 69.5%; negative markers: 17.5% vs. 30.5%).
Conclusions
Overall, no statistically significant differences were observed in clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates between the SPC and LPC groups. These findings suggest that while the timing of embryo transfer (ET) after warming can be adjusted to optimize each laboratory's workflow, the primary determinant of ET strategy should be blastocyst morphology, with culture duration tailored accordingly.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research is the official Journal of the Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and aims to provide a medium for the publication of articles in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology.
The Journal publishes original research articles, case reports, review articles and letters to the editor. The Journal will give publication priority to original research articles over case reports. Accepted papers become the exclusive licence of the Journal. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two referees and/or Associate Editors expert in the field of the submitted paper.