CAD/CAM陶瓷对Vita Mark II的表面粗糙度和磨损行为

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Amirhosein Habibnezhad, Gazaleh Ahmadi, Naeeme Naderi
{"title":"CAD/CAM陶瓷对Vita Mark II的表面粗糙度和磨损行为","authors":"Amirhosein Habibnezhad,&nbsp;Gazaleh Ahmadi,&nbsp;Naeeme Naderi","doi":"10.1002/cre2.70174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to assess the surface roughness (SR) and wear behavior of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramics when compared to a feldspathic ceramic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This in vitro study was conducted on three groups of CAD/CAM ceramic blocks (<i>n</i> = 10 each): a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic, a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network, and a resin nanoceramic. Additionally, 40 feldspathic ceramic blocks and 10 bovine incisors were used as antagonist materials. Surface roughness was measured by profilometry before and after wear testing (49 N, 120,000 cycles, 30 cycles/min). Wear depth was quantified using 3D scanning and image analysis software. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and paired <i>t</i>-tests (α = 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Before wear testing, the zirconia-reinforced ceramic showed significantly higher SR than the other groups (<i>p</i> = 0.00). All groups exhibited a significant reduction in SR after testing (<i>p</i> = 0.00). Posttest SR varied significantly between most groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), except between natural enamel and the resin nanoceramic (<i>p</i> = 0.986). Wear depth differed significantly among the materials (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), with natural enamel showing the lowest wear, comparable only to the resin nanoceramic (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>All tested CAD/CAM ceramics underwent substantial wear and SR reduction when opposed by feldspathic ceramic. The resin nanoceramic demonstrated the closest wear behavior to natural enamel and may be the most suitable restorative material for contact with feldspathic ceramics.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10203,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cre2.70174","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surface Roughness and Wear Behavior of CAD/CAM Ceramics Against Vita Mark II\",\"authors\":\"Amirhosein Habibnezhad,&nbsp;Gazaleh Ahmadi,&nbsp;Naeeme Naderi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cre2.70174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to assess the surface roughness (SR) and wear behavior of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramics when compared to a feldspathic ceramic.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This in vitro study was conducted on three groups of CAD/CAM ceramic blocks (<i>n</i> = 10 each): a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic, a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network, and a resin nanoceramic. Additionally, 40 feldspathic ceramic blocks and 10 bovine incisors were used as antagonist materials. Surface roughness was measured by profilometry before and after wear testing (49 N, 120,000 cycles, 30 cycles/min). Wear depth was quantified using 3D scanning and image analysis software. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and paired <i>t</i>-tests (α = 0.05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Before wear testing, the zirconia-reinforced ceramic showed significantly higher SR than the other groups (<i>p</i> = 0.00). All groups exhibited a significant reduction in SR after testing (<i>p</i> = 0.00). Posttest SR varied significantly between most groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), except between natural enamel and the resin nanoceramic (<i>p</i> = 0.986). Wear depth differed significantly among the materials (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), with natural enamel showing the lowest wear, comparable only to the resin nanoceramic (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>All tested CAD/CAM ceramics underwent substantial wear and SR reduction when opposed by feldspathic ceramic. The resin nanoceramic demonstrated the closest wear behavior to natural enamel and may be the most suitable restorative material for contact with feldspathic ceramics.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cre2.70174\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cre2.70174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cre2.70174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)陶瓷与长石陶瓷的表面粗糙度(SR)和磨损行为。材料与方法本研究采用三组CAD/CAM陶瓷块(每组10个):氧化锆增强硅酸锂陶瓷、聚合物渗透陶瓷网络和树脂纳米陶瓷。另外,用40块长石陶瓷块和10块牛门牙作为拮抗材料。在磨损测试(49 N, 120,000 cycles, 30 cycles/min)前后,通过轮廓术测量表面粗糙度。使用三维扫描和图像分析软件量化磨损深度。数据分析采用方差分析和配对t检验(α = 0.05)。结果在磨损试验前,氧化锆增强陶瓷组的耐磨性显著高于其他组(p = 0.00)。测试后,所有组的SR均显著降低(p = 0.00)。除天然牙釉质与树脂纳米陶瓷间差异显著(p = 0.986)外,其余各组间差异均显著(p < 0.05)。不同材料的磨损深度差异显著(p < 0.001),天然牙釉质的磨损程度最低,仅与树脂纳米陶瓷相媲美(p > 0.05)。结论所有的CAD/CAM陶瓷在与长石陶瓷相对立时都有明显的磨损和SR降低。树脂纳米陶瓷表现出与天然牙釉质最接近的磨损行为,可能是与长石陶瓷接触的最合适的修复材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Surface Roughness and Wear Behavior of CAD/CAM Ceramics Against Vita Mark II

Surface Roughness and Wear Behavior of CAD/CAM Ceramics Against Vita Mark II

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the surface roughness (SR) and wear behavior of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramics when compared to a feldspathic ceramic.

Material and Methods

This in vitro study was conducted on three groups of CAD/CAM ceramic blocks (n = 10 each): a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic, a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network, and a resin nanoceramic. Additionally, 40 feldspathic ceramic blocks and 10 bovine incisors were used as antagonist materials. Surface roughness was measured by profilometry before and after wear testing (49 N, 120,000 cycles, 30 cycles/min). Wear depth was quantified using 3D scanning and image analysis software. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and paired t-tests (α = 0.05).

Results

Before wear testing, the zirconia-reinforced ceramic showed significantly higher SR than the other groups (p = 0.00). All groups exhibited a significant reduction in SR after testing (p = 0.00). Posttest SR varied significantly between most groups (p < 0.05), except between natural enamel and the resin nanoceramic (p = 0.986). Wear depth differed significantly among the materials (p < 0.001), with natural enamel showing the lowest wear, comparable only to the resin nanoceramic (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

All tested CAD/CAM ceramics underwent substantial wear and SR reduction when opposed by feldspathic ceramic. The resin nanoceramic demonstrated the closest wear behavior to natural enamel and may be the most suitable restorative material for contact with feldspathic ceramics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
165
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Dental Research aims to provide open access peer-reviewed publications of high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work within all disciplines and fields of oral medicine and dentistry. The scope of Clinical and Experimental Dental Research comprises original research material on the anatomy, physiology and pathology of oro-facial, oro-pharyngeal and maxillofacial tissues, and functions and dysfunctions within the stomatognathic system, and the epidemiology, aetiology, prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and therapy of diseases and conditions that have an effect on the homeostasis of the mouth, jaws, and closely associated structures, as well as the healing and regeneration and the clinical aspects of replacement of hard and soft tissues with biomaterials, and the rehabilitation of stomatognathic functions. Studies that bring new knowledge on how to advance health on the individual or public health levels, including interactions between oral and general health and ill-health are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信