干旱指数对草地生态系统土壤有机碳源积累的解释

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Jinpeng Ma, Lin Chen, Danbo Pang, Mengyao Wu, Yaqi Zhang, Yinglong Chen, Xuebin Li
{"title":"干旱指数对草地生态系统土壤有机碳源积累的解释","authors":"Jinpeng Ma,&nbsp;Lin Chen,&nbsp;Danbo Pang,&nbsp;Mengyao Wu,&nbsp;Yaqi Zhang,&nbsp;Yinglong Chen,&nbsp;Xuebin Li","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Plant-derived carbon (PDC) and microbial-derived carbon (MDC) are the crucial sources of soil organic carbon (SOC), and their contributions strongly affect the stability and turnover of soil organic matter. However, the mechanism underlying the contribution of PDC and MDC to SOC across different grassland types is poorly understood. In this study, we selected four grassland types in Ningxia, China, at a regional scale, including meadow steppe, typical steppe, desert steppe, and steppe desert. We analysed the characteristics of PDC and MDC in topsoil (0–20 cm) and subsoil (20–40 cm) across different grassland types and their contributions to SOC. Our results showed PDC and MDC contents in meadow steppe were significantly larger than those in the other grassland types (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), while the contribution of PDC and MDC to SOC in desert steppe was greatest (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), and bigger in subsoil than in topsoil. Vanillyl phenols-derived carbon (19%) and fungal necromass carbon (69%) were the main contributors to PDC and MDC, respectively. In addition, random forest model results showed that climate, vegetation, and soil explained 55% and 85% of the variation in PDC and MDC, respectively (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). A structural equation model revealed that aridity index was the primary factor influencing SOC sources in grassland ecosystems. This study examined the contributions of PDC and MDC to SOC across different grassland types, as well as the underlying mechanisms of SOC sequestration, providing insights into the carbon cycle processes within grassland ecosystems.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aridity Index Explains the Accumulation of Soil Organic Carbon Sources in Grassland Ecosystem\",\"authors\":\"Jinpeng Ma,&nbsp;Lin Chen,&nbsp;Danbo Pang,&nbsp;Mengyao Wu,&nbsp;Yaqi Zhang,&nbsp;Yinglong Chen,&nbsp;Xuebin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejss.70158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Plant-derived carbon (PDC) and microbial-derived carbon (MDC) are the crucial sources of soil organic carbon (SOC), and their contributions strongly affect the stability and turnover of soil organic matter. However, the mechanism underlying the contribution of PDC and MDC to SOC across different grassland types is poorly understood. In this study, we selected four grassland types in Ningxia, China, at a regional scale, including meadow steppe, typical steppe, desert steppe, and steppe desert. We analysed the characteristics of PDC and MDC in topsoil (0–20 cm) and subsoil (20–40 cm) across different grassland types and their contributions to SOC. Our results showed PDC and MDC contents in meadow steppe were significantly larger than those in the other grassland types (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), while the contribution of PDC and MDC to SOC in desert steppe was greatest (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), and bigger in subsoil than in topsoil. Vanillyl phenols-derived carbon (19%) and fungal necromass carbon (69%) were the main contributors to PDC and MDC, respectively. In addition, random forest model results showed that climate, vegetation, and soil explained 55% and 85% of the variation in PDC and MDC, respectively (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). A structural equation model revealed that aridity index was the primary factor influencing SOC sources in grassland ecosystems. This study examined the contributions of PDC and MDC to SOC across different grassland types, as well as the underlying mechanisms of SOC sequestration, providing insights into the carbon cycle processes within grassland ecosystems.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"volume\":\"76 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70158\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70158","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植物源碳(PDC)和微生物源碳(MDC)是土壤有机碳(SOC)的重要来源,它们的贡献对土壤有机质的稳定性和周转有重要影响。然而,不同草地类型中PDC和MDC对土壤有机碳贡献的机制尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们选取了宁夏区域尺度上的草甸草原、典型草原、荒漠草原和草原荒漠4种草地类型。分析了不同草地类型耕层(0 ~ 20 cm)和下层(20 ~ 40 cm)土壤中PDC和MDC的特征及其对土壤有机碳的贡献。结果表明:草甸草原中PDC和MDC含量显著大于其他草地类型(p < 0.05),荒漠草原中PDC和MDC对SOC的贡献最大(p < 0.05),且底土大于表土。香草酚衍生碳(19%)和真菌坏死块碳(69%)分别是PDC和MDC的主要贡献者。此外,随机森林模型结果显示,气候、植被和土壤分别解释了PDC和MDC变化的55%和85% (p < 0.001)。结构方程模型表明,干旱指数是影响草地生态系统有机碳来源的主要因素。本研究探讨了不同草地类型的PDC和MDC对有机碳的贡献,以及有机碳固存的潜在机制,为深入了解草地生态系统的碳循环过程提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aridity Index Explains the Accumulation of Soil Organic Carbon Sources in Grassland Ecosystem

Plant-derived carbon (PDC) and microbial-derived carbon (MDC) are the crucial sources of soil organic carbon (SOC), and their contributions strongly affect the stability and turnover of soil organic matter. However, the mechanism underlying the contribution of PDC and MDC to SOC across different grassland types is poorly understood. In this study, we selected four grassland types in Ningxia, China, at a regional scale, including meadow steppe, typical steppe, desert steppe, and steppe desert. We analysed the characteristics of PDC and MDC in topsoil (0–20 cm) and subsoil (20–40 cm) across different grassland types and their contributions to SOC. Our results showed PDC and MDC contents in meadow steppe were significantly larger than those in the other grassland types (p < 0.05), while the contribution of PDC and MDC to SOC in desert steppe was greatest (p < 0.05), and bigger in subsoil than in topsoil. Vanillyl phenols-derived carbon (19%) and fungal necromass carbon (69%) were the main contributors to PDC and MDC, respectively. In addition, random forest model results showed that climate, vegetation, and soil explained 55% and 85% of the variation in PDC and MDC, respectively (p < 0.001). A structural equation model revealed that aridity index was the primary factor influencing SOC sources in grassland ecosystems. This study examined the contributions of PDC and MDC to SOC across different grassland types, as well as the underlying mechanisms of SOC sequestration, providing insights into the carbon cycle processes within grassland ecosystems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信