微藻生物燃料:可持续能源解决方案的前沿收获和提取方法

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Abu Saleh Ahmed, Alamry Ali, Emre Gorgun, M. Jameel, Tasmina Khandaker, Md. Shaharul Islam, Md. Saiful Islam, Masuk Abdullah
{"title":"微藻生物燃料:可持续能源解决方案的前沿收获和提取方法","authors":"Abu Saleh Ahmed,&nbsp;Alamry Ali,&nbsp;Emre Gorgun,&nbsp;M. Jameel,&nbsp;Tasmina Khandaker,&nbsp;Md. Shaharul Islam,&nbsp;Md. Saiful Islam,&nbsp;Masuk Abdullah","doi":"10.1002/ese3.70111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The increasing price and demand for fossil fuels are driven by their depletion, greenhouse gas emissions, and industrial air pollution. As a result, the search for renewable alternatives has gained serious attention. Microalgae provide a sustainable alternative for biofuel production, offering high growth rates, significant oil yields and productivity, nontoxic nature, higher photosynthesis efficiencies, and the ability to thrive on nonarable land. <i>Chlorella vulgaris</i> and <i>Scenedesmus dimorphus</i> strains were chosen for this study to develop effective harvesting and oil extraction methods for sustainable energy. Three types of harvesting methods are used to optimize slurry yields, viz. flocculation, high-speed refrigerated centrifugation, and microfiltration. Moreover, two oil extraction methods were considered to enhance efficiency: Soxhlet extraction and the direct boiling method. The centrifugation method provides the fastest harvesting rate and highest slurry yields, followed by membrane separation, while flocculation, though slower, is more cost-effective and easier to perform. The direct boiling method optimizes the oil extraction process by effectively rupturing microalgae cell walls. <i>Chlorella vulgaris</i> shows a slurry recovery efficiency of 0.76 g per liter of media by centrifuge, consisting of 12%–40% oil content in overall weight; 12.7% of the oil was extracted using Soxhlet extraction, and 18.7% was extracted using the direct boiling method. On the other hand, <i>Scenedesmus dimorphus</i> shows better slurry recovery efficiency of 0.81 g per liter media by centrifuge, consisting of 22%–51% oil content in overall weight, and there is 23.8% oil extracted by using soxhlet extraction and 26.4% for every 10 g of the sample by direct boiling method compared to <i>Chlorella vulgaris</i>. Future research should focus on cost-effective harvesting and oil extraction methods for microalgae like <i>Chlorella vulgaris</i> and <i>Scenedesmus dimorphus</i> to reduce production costs, maximize biofuel yields, and tackle the global energy crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11673,"journal":{"name":"Energy Science & Engineering","volume":"13 7","pages":"3525-3540"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.70111","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microalgae to Biofuel: Cutting-Edge Harvesting and Extraction Methods for Sustainable Energy Solution\",\"authors\":\"Abu Saleh Ahmed,&nbsp;Alamry Ali,&nbsp;Emre Gorgun,&nbsp;M. Jameel,&nbsp;Tasmina Khandaker,&nbsp;Md. Shaharul Islam,&nbsp;Md. Saiful Islam,&nbsp;Masuk Abdullah\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ese3.70111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The increasing price and demand for fossil fuels are driven by their depletion, greenhouse gas emissions, and industrial air pollution. As a result, the search for renewable alternatives has gained serious attention. Microalgae provide a sustainable alternative for biofuel production, offering high growth rates, significant oil yields and productivity, nontoxic nature, higher photosynthesis efficiencies, and the ability to thrive on nonarable land. <i>Chlorella vulgaris</i> and <i>Scenedesmus dimorphus</i> strains were chosen for this study to develop effective harvesting and oil extraction methods for sustainable energy. Three types of harvesting methods are used to optimize slurry yields, viz. flocculation, high-speed refrigerated centrifugation, and microfiltration. Moreover, two oil extraction methods were considered to enhance efficiency: Soxhlet extraction and the direct boiling method. The centrifugation method provides the fastest harvesting rate and highest slurry yields, followed by membrane separation, while flocculation, though slower, is more cost-effective and easier to perform. The direct boiling method optimizes the oil extraction process by effectively rupturing microalgae cell walls. <i>Chlorella vulgaris</i> shows a slurry recovery efficiency of 0.76 g per liter of media by centrifuge, consisting of 12%–40% oil content in overall weight; 12.7% of the oil was extracted using Soxhlet extraction, and 18.7% was extracted using the direct boiling method. On the other hand, <i>Scenedesmus dimorphus</i> shows better slurry recovery efficiency of 0.81 g per liter media by centrifuge, consisting of 22%–51% oil content in overall weight, and there is 23.8% oil extracted by using soxhlet extraction and 26.4% for every 10 g of the sample by direct boiling method compared to <i>Chlorella vulgaris</i>. Future research should focus on cost-effective harvesting and oil extraction methods for microalgae like <i>Chlorella vulgaris</i> and <i>Scenedesmus dimorphus</i> to reduce production costs, maximize biofuel yields, and tackle the global energy crisis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Science & Engineering\",\"volume\":\"13 7\",\"pages\":\"3525-3540\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.70111\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Science & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.70111\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.70111","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

化石燃料的消耗、温室气体排放和工业空气污染推动了化石燃料价格和需求的不断上涨。因此,寻找可再生能源的替代品得到了认真的关注。微藻为生物燃料生产提供了一种可持续的替代方案,具有高增长率、显著的产油量和生产力、无毒特性、更高的光合作用效率以及在非耕地上茁壮成长的能力。以普通小球藻(Chlorella vulgaris)和二态小球藻(Scenedesmus dimorphus)为研究对象,探索有效的采收和油脂提取方法。三种类型的收获方法被用来优化浆料产量,即絮凝,高速冷冻离心和微过滤。此外,还考虑了索氏提取法和直接煮沸法两种提高萃取效率的方法。离心法收获速度最快,料浆产量最高,其次是膜分离法,而絮凝法虽然速度较慢,但成本效益更高,操作也更容易。直接沸腾法通过有效地破坏微藻细胞壁,优化了油脂提取工艺。普通小球藻(Chlorella vulgaris)的料浆回收率为0.76 g / l,料浆含油量占总重的12% ~ 40%;索氏浸提法提取12.7%,直接煮沸法提取18.7%。另一方面,与普通小球藻相比,双叶小球藻的料浆回收率更高,离心回收率为0.81 g / l,总重含油量为22%-51%,索氏提取法的油提取率为23.8%,直接煮沸法的油提取率为26.4%。未来的研究重点应放在对小球藻和双叶藻等微藻进行经济高效的采收和榨油方法上,以降低生产成本,最大限度地提高生物燃料产量,应对全球能源危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Microalgae to Biofuel: Cutting-Edge Harvesting and Extraction Methods for Sustainable Energy Solution

Microalgae to Biofuel: Cutting-Edge Harvesting and Extraction Methods for Sustainable Energy Solution

The increasing price and demand for fossil fuels are driven by their depletion, greenhouse gas emissions, and industrial air pollution. As a result, the search for renewable alternatives has gained serious attention. Microalgae provide a sustainable alternative for biofuel production, offering high growth rates, significant oil yields and productivity, nontoxic nature, higher photosynthesis efficiencies, and the ability to thrive on nonarable land. Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus dimorphus strains were chosen for this study to develop effective harvesting and oil extraction methods for sustainable energy. Three types of harvesting methods are used to optimize slurry yields, viz. flocculation, high-speed refrigerated centrifugation, and microfiltration. Moreover, two oil extraction methods were considered to enhance efficiency: Soxhlet extraction and the direct boiling method. The centrifugation method provides the fastest harvesting rate and highest slurry yields, followed by membrane separation, while flocculation, though slower, is more cost-effective and easier to perform. The direct boiling method optimizes the oil extraction process by effectively rupturing microalgae cell walls. Chlorella vulgaris shows a slurry recovery efficiency of 0.76 g per liter of media by centrifuge, consisting of 12%–40% oil content in overall weight; 12.7% of the oil was extracted using Soxhlet extraction, and 18.7% was extracted using the direct boiling method. On the other hand, Scenedesmus dimorphus shows better slurry recovery efficiency of 0.81 g per liter media by centrifuge, consisting of 22%–51% oil content in overall weight, and there is 23.8% oil extracted by using soxhlet extraction and 26.4% for every 10 g of the sample by direct boiling method compared to Chlorella vulgaris. Future research should focus on cost-effective harvesting and oil extraction methods for microalgae like Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus dimorphus to reduce production costs, maximize biofuel yields, and tackle the global energy crisis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Science & Engineering
Energy Science & Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
298
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Science & Engineering is a peer reviewed, open access journal dedicated to fundamental and applied research on energy and supply and use. Published as a co-operative venture of Wiley and SCI (Society of Chemical Industry), the journal offers authors a fast route to publication and the ability to share their research with the widest possible audience of scientists, professionals and other interested people across the globe. Securing an affordable and low carbon energy supply is a critical challenge of the 21st century and the solutions will require collaboration between scientists and engineers worldwide. This new journal aims to facilitate collaboration and spark innovation in energy research and development. Due to the importance of this topic to society and economic development the journal will give priority to quality research papers that are accessible to a broad readership and discuss sustainable, state-of-the art approaches to shaping the future of energy. This multidisciplinary journal will appeal to all researchers and professionals working in any area of energy in academia, industry or government, including scientists, engineers, consultants, policy-makers, government officials, economists and corporate organisations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信