Meixue Sun, Wenhui Jiang, Yingjie Liu, Jun Wang, Zheng Sun, Guangwei Ren, Pengjun Xu, Haibin Deng
{"title":"比较转录组分析揭示植食和植食蝽气味结合蛋白和化学感觉蛋白的差异","authors":"Meixue Sun, Wenhui Jiang, Yingjie Liu, Jun Wang, Zheng Sun, Guangwei Ren, Pengjun Xu, Haibin Deng","doi":"10.1002/arch.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) and chemosensory proteins (CSPs) are essential for host-seeking behaviors in herbivorous and predatory insects. However, limited studies have examined differences in the OBP and CSP profiles between herbivores and predators. Mirid bugs, which ancestrally were predatory, provide an ideal model to investigate these differences because some of mirid species have evolved to develop herbivorous capacities. In this study, we compared compared OBP and CSP profiles among transcriptome analysis of one zoophytophagous and four phytozoophagous mirid bugs, identifying a total of 146 OBPs and 69 CSPs. The number of OBPs was similar between phytozoophagous (26 in <i>Adelphocoris fasciaticollis</i>, 29 in <i>Adelphocoris lineolatus</i>, 28 in <i>Apolygus lucorum</i>, and 32 in <i>Adelphocoris suturalis</i>) and zoophytophagous (31 in <i>Nesidiocoris tenuis</i>) species. However, the zoophytophagous specie had more CSPs than the phytozoophagous species. Phylogenetic analysis revealed two types of OBPs in mirid bugs, with classic OBPs being more abundant than plus-C OBPs. Transcriptome revealed that the number of OBPs with high expressions was higher in the phytozoophagous species (18) than in the zoophytophagous species (14). By contrast, more CSPs (10) exhibited high expressions in the zoophytophagous mirid bug compared with those in the phytozoophagous species (≤ 7). These results suggest that differences in the number and expression levels of OBPs and CSPs between zoophytophagous and phytozoophagous mirid bugs affect host-selection processes. In conclusion, the findings provide a basis for developing novel pest management strategies, including the use of natural enemies or behavioral regulation of mirid bugs through OBP and CSP gene manipulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8281,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology","volume":"119 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Revealed Differences in Odorant-Binding and Chemosensory Proteins Between Zoophytophagous and Phytozoophagous Mirid Bugs\",\"authors\":\"Meixue Sun, Wenhui Jiang, Yingjie Liu, Jun Wang, Zheng Sun, Guangwei Ren, Pengjun Xu, Haibin Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/arch.70074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) and chemosensory proteins (CSPs) are essential for host-seeking behaviors in herbivorous and predatory insects. However, limited studies have examined differences in the OBP and CSP profiles between herbivores and predators. Mirid bugs, which ancestrally were predatory, provide an ideal model to investigate these differences because some of mirid species have evolved to develop herbivorous capacities. In this study, we compared compared OBP and CSP profiles among transcriptome analysis of one zoophytophagous and four phytozoophagous mirid bugs, identifying a total of 146 OBPs and 69 CSPs. The number of OBPs was similar between phytozoophagous (26 in <i>Adelphocoris fasciaticollis</i>, 29 in <i>Adelphocoris lineolatus</i>, 28 in <i>Apolygus lucorum</i>, and 32 in <i>Adelphocoris suturalis</i>) and zoophytophagous (31 in <i>Nesidiocoris tenuis</i>) species. However, the zoophytophagous specie had more CSPs than the phytozoophagous species. Phylogenetic analysis revealed two types of OBPs in mirid bugs, with classic OBPs being more abundant than plus-C OBPs. Transcriptome revealed that the number of OBPs with high expressions was higher in the phytozoophagous species (18) than in the zoophytophagous species (14). By contrast, more CSPs (10) exhibited high expressions in the zoophytophagous mirid bug compared with those in the phytozoophagous species (≤ 7). These results suggest that differences in the number and expression levels of OBPs and CSPs between zoophytophagous and phytozoophagous mirid bugs affect host-selection processes. In conclusion, the findings provide a basis for developing novel pest management strategies, including the use of natural enemies or behavioral regulation of mirid bugs through OBP and CSP gene manipulation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology\",\"volume\":\"119 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arch.70074\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arch.70074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Revealed Differences in Odorant-Binding and Chemosensory Proteins Between Zoophytophagous and Phytozoophagous Mirid Bugs
Odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) and chemosensory proteins (CSPs) are essential for host-seeking behaviors in herbivorous and predatory insects. However, limited studies have examined differences in the OBP and CSP profiles between herbivores and predators. Mirid bugs, which ancestrally were predatory, provide an ideal model to investigate these differences because some of mirid species have evolved to develop herbivorous capacities. In this study, we compared compared OBP and CSP profiles among transcriptome analysis of one zoophytophagous and four phytozoophagous mirid bugs, identifying a total of 146 OBPs and 69 CSPs. The number of OBPs was similar between phytozoophagous (26 in Adelphocoris fasciaticollis, 29 in Adelphocoris lineolatus, 28 in Apolygus lucorum, and 32 in Adelphocoris suturalis) and zoophytophagous (31 in Nesidiocoris tenuis) species. However, the zoophytophagous specie had more CSPs than the phytozoophagous species. Phylogenetic analysis revealed two types of OBPs in mirid bugs, with classic OBPs being more abundant than plus-C OBPs. Transcriptome revealed that the number of OBPs with high expressions was higher in the phytozoophagous species (18) than in the zoophytophagous species (14). By contrast, more CSPs (10) exhibited high expressions in the zoophytophagous mirid bug compared with those in the phytozoophagous species (≤ 7). These results suggest that differences in the number and expression levels of OBPs and CSPs between zoophytophagous and phytozoophagous mirid bugs affect host-selection processes. In conclusion, the findings provide a basis for developing novel pest management strategies, including the use of natural enemies or behavioral regulation of mirid bugs through OBP and CSP gene manipulation.
期刊介绍:
Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology is an international journal that publishes articles in English that are of interest to insect biochemists and physiologists. Generally these articles will be in, or related to, one of the following subject areas: Behavior, Bioinformatics, Carbohydrates, Cell Line Development, Cell Signalling, Development, Drug Discovery, Endocrinology, Enzymes, Lipids, Molecular Biology, Neurobiology, Nucleic Acids, Nutrition, Peptides, Pharmacology, Pollinators, Proteins, Toxicology. Archives will publish only original articles. Articles that are confirmatory in nature or deal with analytical methods previously described will not be accepted.