{"title":"降钙素原与糖尿病足溃疡感染:荟萃分析","authors":"Wenqiang Wang, Peilin Zhou, Xinyu Nie, Qikai Hua","doi":"10.1002/edm2.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Procalcitonin (PCT) is an effective inflammatory marker for diagnosing infection. We assessed the clinical utility of procalcitonin in diagnosing diabetic foot infections.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>This meta-analysis adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library for studies on PCT for the diagnosis of diabetic foot published before 1 July 2024. The primary outcome was the standardised mean difference (SMD) in PCT levels between IDFU and non-IDFU groups, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). The included studies were cross-sectional and cohort studies, so the quality of the literature was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) evaluation criteria. This study's statistical analyses were conducted solely with STATA 15.0 software.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Result</h3>\n \n <p>Ten studies comprising 928 patients were ultimately included. There were six cross-sectional studies and four cohort studies. In total, 532 patients were assigned to the IDFU group and 396 to the non-infected diabetic foot ulcers (NIDFU) group. The relationship between PCT and DFU was evaluated in ten studies, with significant heterogeneity among the included studies (<i>x</i><sup>2</sup> = 54.10, <i>p =</i> 0.00001; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 83.6%). Therefore, a random effects model was used with a pooled standardised mean difference of 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43–1.14). The Egger experiment results (<i>t</i> = 0.43, <i>p</i> = 0.680) indicated that there was no publication bias. Analysis of sensitivity revealed that the results were reliable. Subgroup analyses identified the area as a significant source of heterogeneity. The random-effects model's meta-regression results revealed that BMI (<i>p</i> = 0.026) and HbA1c (<i>p</i> = 0.016) had a significant impact on the heterogeneity of the association between IDFU and PCT levels.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our study showed a significant correlation between serum PCT levels and IDFU. Identification and treatment of IDFUs as soon as possible can help reduce amputation and mortality rates.</p>\n \n <p>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the association between serum procalcitonin levels and diabetic foot infections. Ten studies were included, and a random-effects model showed significantly higher procalcitonin levels in infected patients, supporting its role as a potential diagnostic biomarker for early infection detection in diabetic foot ulcers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36522,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edm2.70066","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Procalcitonin and Diabetic Foot Ulcer Infections: A Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Wenqiang Wang, Peilin Zhou, Xinyu Nie, Qikai Hua\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edm2.70066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Procalcitonin (PCT) is an effective inflammatory marker for diagnosing infection. We assessed the clinical utility of procalcitonin in diagnosing diabetic foot infections.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>This meta-analysis adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library for studies on PCT for the diagnosis of diabetic foot published before 1 July 2024. The primary outcome was the standardised mean difference (SMD) in PCT levels between IDFU and non-IDFU groups, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). The included studies were cross-sectional and cohort studies, so the quality of the literature was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) evaluation criteria. This study's statistical analyses were conducted solely with STATA 15.0 software.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Result</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ten studies comprising 928 patients were ultimately included. There were six cross-sectional studies and four cohort studies. In total, 532 patients were assigned to the IDFU group and 396 to the non-infected diabetic foot ulcers (NIDFU) group. The relationship between PCT and DFU was evaluated in ten studies, with significant heterogeneity among the included studies (<i>x</i><sup>2</sup> = 54.10, <i>p =</i> 0.00001; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 83.6%). Therefore, a random effects model was used with a pooled standardised mean difference of 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43–1.14). The Egger experiment results (<i>t</i> = 0.43, <i>p</i> = 0.680) indicated that there was no publication bias. Analysis of sensitivity revealed that the results were reliable. Subgroup analyses identified the area as a significant source of heterogeneity. The random-effects model's meta-regression results revealed that BMI (<i>p</i> = 0.026) and HbA1c (<i>p</i> = 0.016) had a significant impact on the heterogeneity of the association between IDFU and PCT levels.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our study showed a significant correlation between serum PCT levels and IDFU. Identification and treatment of IDFUs as soon as possible can help reduce amputation and mortality rates.</p>\\n \\n <p>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the association between serum procalcitonin levels and diabetic foot infections. Ten studies were included, and a random-effects model showed significantly higher procalcitonin levels in infected patients, supporting its role as a potential diagnostic biomarker for early infection detection in diabetic foot ulcers.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edm2.70066\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edm2.70066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edm2.70066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
降钙素原(PCT)是诊断感染的有效炎症标志物。我们评估了降钙素原在诊断糖尿病足部感染中的临床应用。方法本荟萃分析遵循PRISMA指南。我们检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,检索2024年7月1日前发表的PCT诊断糖尿病足的相关研究。主要结局是IDFU组和非IDFU组之间PCT水平的标准化平均差(SMD),具有相应的95%置信区间(CI)。纳入的研究为横断面和队列研究,因此采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估标准对文献质量进行评估。本研究的统计分析仅使用STATA 15.0软件进行。结果最终纳入10项研究,928例患者。有6项横断面研究和4项队列研究。共有532名患者被分配到IDFU组,396名患者被分配到非感染性糖尿病足溃疡(NIDFU)组。10项研究评估了PCT与DFU之间的关系,纳入的研究之间存在显著的异质性(x2 = 54.10, p = 0.00001;i2 = 83.6%)。因此,采用随机效应模型,合并标准化平均差为0.79(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.43-1.14)。Egger实验结果(t = 0.43, p = 0.680)表明不存在发表偏倚。敏感性分析表明,结果是可靠的。亚组分析确定该地区是异质性的重要来源。随机效应模型的meta回归结果显示,BMI (p = 0.026)和HbA1c (p = 0.016)对IDFU和PCT水平相关性的异质性有显著影响。结论血清PCT水平与IDFU有显著相关性。尽早发现和治疗idfu有助于减少截肢和死亡率。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了血清降钙素原水平与糖尿病足感染之间的关系。纳入了10项研究,随机效应模型显示感染患者的降钙素原水平显着升高,支持其作为糖尿病足溃疡早期感染检测的潜在诊断生物标志物的作用。
Procalcitonin and Diabetic Foot Ulcer Infections: A Meta-Analysis
Background
Procalcitonin (PCT) is an effective inflammatory marker for diagnosing infection. We assessed the clinical utility of procalcitonin in diagnosing diabetic foot infections.
Method
This meta-analysis adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library for studies on PCT for the diagnosis of diabetic foot published before 1 July 2024. The primary outcome was the standardised mean difference (SMD) in PCT levels between IDFU and non-IDFU groups, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). The included studies were cross-sectional and cohort studies, so the quality of the literature was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) evaluation criteria. This study's statistical analyses were conducted solely with STATA 15.0 software.
Result
Ten studies comprising 928 patients were ultimately included. There were six cross-sectional studies and four cohort studies. In total, 532 patients were assigned to the IDFU group and 396 to the non-infected diabetic foot ulcers (NIDFU) group. The relationship between PCT and DFU was evaluated in ten studies, with significant heterogeneity among the included studies (x2 = 54.10, p = 0.00001; I2 = 83.6%). Therefore, a random effects model was used with a pooled standardised mean difference of 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43–1.14). The Egger experiment results (t = 0.43, p = 0.680) indicated that there was no publication bias. Analysis of sensitivity revealed that the results were reliable. Subgroup analyses identified the area as a significant source of heterogeneity. The random-effects model's meta-regression results revealed that BMI (p = 0.026) and HbA1c (p = 0.016) had a significant impact on the heterogeneity of the association between IDFU and PCT levels.
Conclusion
Our study showed a significant correlation between serum PCT levels and IDFU. Identification and treatment of IDFUs as soon as possible can help reduce amputation and mortality rates.
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the association between serum procalcitonin levels and diabetic foot infections. Ten studies were included, and a random-effects model showed significantly higher procalcitonin levels in infected patients, supporting its role as a potential diagnostic biomarker for early infection detection in diabetic foot ulcers.