Ravinder S. Saini, Sunil Kumar Vaddamanu, Masroor Ahmed Kanji, Seyed Ali Mosaddad, Artak Heboyan
{"title":"三维成像在牙周病评估中的比较分析：一项系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Ravinder S. Saini, Sunil Kumar Vaddamanu, Masroor Ahmed Kanji, Seyed Ali Mosaddad, Artak Heboyan","doi":"10.1002/cre2.70169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of three-dimensional (3D) imaging techniques in terms of accuracy and precision for periodontal disease assessment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A literature search was conducted across multiple databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect) following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) protocols. The primary outcomes focused on comparing the accuracy and precision of 3D versus two-dimensional (2D) imaging techniques. Furthermore, it assessed their performance in determining periodontal diseases. Quality assessment was performed using the risk of bias (RoB)-2 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and ROB in nonrandomized studies-Intervention (ROBINS-I) for non-RCTs. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 with a significance level set at 0.01. While meta-regression was performed using OpenMEE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>After screening, 22 studies met the eligibility criteria for qualitative and quantitative analysis. Qualitatively, 3D imaging, particularly cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), showed superior accuracy and precision over 2D techniques. The meta-analysis revealed significant differences in several areas: overall (<i>p</i> = 0.00001, Mean Difference (MD) = −0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.96 to 0.24, <i>I</i>² = 93%), horizontal measurements (<i>p</i> = 0.00001, MD = −0.75, 95% CI: −2 to −0.49, <i>I</i>² = 92%), and vertical measurements (<i>p</i> = 0.00001, MD = −0.59, 95% CI: −2.40 to 1.23, <i>I</i>² = 92%). Nonsignificant differences were found for furcation height, width, and depth. Most studies showed good quality with a low risk of bias. Age of the participants and study quality were found to be the sources of heterogeneity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Consistent trends highlight the advantages of 3D imaging in assessing both periodontal and nonperiodontal diseases. However, given the nonsignificant differences in furcation height, width, and depth, the recommended approach is to combine CBCT with digital intraoral radiography for more comprehensive periodontal bone assessment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10203,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cre2.70169","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of 3D Imaging in Periodontal Disease Assessment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ravinder S. Saini, Sunil Kumar Vaddamanu, Masroor Ahmed Kanji, Seyed Ali Mosaddad, Artak Heboyan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cre2.70169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of three-dimensional (3D) imaging techniques in terms of accuracy and precision for periodontal disease assessment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A literature search was conducted across multiple databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect) following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) protocols. The primary outcomes focused on comparing the accuracy and precision of 3D versus two-dimensional (2D) imaging techniques. Furthermore, it assessed their performance in determining periodontal diseases. Quality assessment was performed using the risk of bias (RoB)-2 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and ROB in nonrandomized studies-Intervention (ROBINS-I) for non-RCTs. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 with a significance level set at 0.01. While meta-regression was performed using OpenMEE.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>After screening, 22 studies met the eligibility criteria for qualitative and quantitative analysis. Qualitatively, 3D imaging, particularly cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), showed superior accuracy and precision over 2D techniques. The meta-analysis revealed significant differences in several areas: overall (<i>p</i> = 0.00001, Mean Difference (MD) = −0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.96 to 0.24, <i>I</i>² = 93%), horizontal measurements (<i>p</i> = 0.00001, MD = −0.75, 95% CI: −2 to −0.49, <i>I</i>² = 92%), and vertical measurements (<i>p</i> = 0.00001, MD = −0.59, 95% CI: −2.40 to 1.23, <i>I</i>² = 92%). Nonsignificant differences were found for furcation height, width, and depth. Most studies showed good quality with a low risk of bias. Age of the participants and study quality were found to be the sources of heterogeneity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Consistent trends highlight the advantages of 3D imaging in assessing both periodontal and nonperiodontal diseases. However, given the nonsignificant differences in furcation height, width, and depth, the recommended approach is to combine CBCT with digital intraoral radiography for more comprehensive periodontal bone assessment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cre2.70169\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cre2.70169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cre2.70169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Analysis of 3D Imaging in Periodontal Disease Assessment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Objectives
The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of three-dimensional (3D) imaging techniques in terms of accuracy and precision for periodontal disease assessment.
Material and Methods
A literature search was conducted across multiple databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect) following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) protocols. The primary outcomes focused on comparing the accuracy and precision of 3D versus two-dimensional (2D) imaging techniques. Furthermore, it assessed their performance in determining periodontal diseases. Quality assessment was performed using the risk of bias (RoB)-2 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and ROB in nonrandomized studies-Intervention (ROBINS-I) for non-RCTs. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 with a significance level set at 0.01. While meta-regression was performed using OpenMEE.
Results
After screening, 22 studies met the eligibility criteria for qualitative and quantitative analysis. Qualitatively, 3D imaging, particularly cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), showed superior accuracy and precision over 2D techniques. The meta-analysis revealed significant differences in several areas: overall (p = 0.00001, Mean Difference (MD) = −0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.96 to 0.24, I² = 93%), horizontal measurements (p = 0.00001, MD = −0.75, 95% CI: −2 to −0.49, I² = 92%), and vertical measurements (p = 0.00001, MD = −0.59, 95% CI: −2.40 to 1.23, I² = 92%). Nonsignificant differences were found for furcation height, width, and depth. Most studies showed good quality with a low risk of bias. Age of the participants and study quality were found to be the sources of heterogeneity.
Conclusions
Consistent trends highlight the advantages of 3D imaging in assessing both periodontal and nonperiodontal diseases. However, given the nonsignificant differences in furcation height, width, and depth, the recommended approach is to combine CBCT with digital intraoral radiography for more comprehensive periodontal bone assessment.
期刊介绍：
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research aims to provide open access peer-reviewed publications of high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work within all disciplines and fields of oral medicine and dentistry. The scope of Clinical and Experimental Dental Research comprises original research material on the anatomy, physiology and pathology of oro-facial, oro-pharyngeal and maxillofacial tissues, and functions and dysfunctions within the stomatognathic system, and the epidemiology, aetiology, prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and therapy of diseases and conditions that have an effect on the homeostasis of the mouth, jaws, and closely associated structures, as well as the healing and regeneration and the clinical aspects of replacement of hard and soft tissues with biomaterials, and the rehabilitation of stomatognathic functions. Studies that bring new knowledge on how to advance health on the individual or public health levels, including interactions between oral and general health and ill-health are welcome.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
