动机很重要:成就、隶属关系和权力需求在商学院学生数字同伴协作中的作用

IF 5.8 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Tippawong Rodjanatham, Yuosre F. Badir
{"title":"动机很重要:成就、隶属关系和权力需求在商学院学生数字同伴协作中的作用","authors":"Tippawong Rodjanatham,&nbsp;Yuosre F. Badir","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Collaboration is increasingly recognized as a core competency in both educational and professional contexts, particularly within current management education where online group work has become prevalent. Despite its importance, student engagement in online collaborative learning remains inconsistent, with motivation identified as a key but underexplored factor influencing participation. Prior research has largely neglected the motivational dynamics underpinning students' intentions and actual behaviors in digital group settings, especially among diverse student populations such as full-time and part-time MBA students. To address this gap, we integrate McClelland's Theory of Needs (encompassing the needs for achievement, affiliation, and power) with the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to investigate how these motivational needs shape students' intentions and behaviors in online peer collaboration. We adopted a time-lagged research design, using a two-wave online survey and convenience sampling to collect data from 279 students enrolled in four business schools in Bangkok, Thailand. Structural equation modeling analysis empirically supports a U-shaped relationship between digital peer collaboration intention and actual collaboration, challenging traditional linear assumptions. Furthermore, the need for achievement and affiliation positively influenced collaboration intention, whereas the need for power exhibited no significant association. Differences between full-time and part-time students emerged regarding the impact of the need for power on collaboration intention. These findings advance understanding of the motivational mechanisms driving online collaboration and underscore the necessity of tailoring engagement strategies to different student groups in management education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100746"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motivation matters: The role of achievement, affiliation, and power needs in digital peer collaboration among business school students\",\"authors\":\"Tippawong Rodjanatham,&nbsp;Yuosre F. Badir\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Collaboration is increasingly recognized as a core competency in both educational and professional contexts, particularly within current management education where online group work has become prevalent. Despite its importance, student engagement in online collaborative learning remains inconsistent, with motivation identified as a key but underexplored factor influencing participation. Prior research has largely neglected the motivational dynamics underpinning students' intentions and actual behaviors in digital group settings, especially among diverse student populations such as full-time and part-time MBA students. To address this gap, we integrate McClelland's Theory of Needs (encompassing the needs for achievement, affiliation, and power) with the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to investigate how these motivational needs shape students' intentions and behaviors in online peer collaboration. We adopted a time-lagged research design, using a two-wave online survey and convenience sampling to collect data from 279 students enrolled in four business schools in Bangkok, Thailand. Structural equation modeling analysis empirically supports a U-shaped relationship between digital peer collaboration intention and actual collaboration, challenging traditional linear assumptions. Furthermore, the need for achievement and affiliation positively influenced collaboration intention, whereas the need for power exhibited no significant association. Differences between full-time and part-time students emerged regarding the impact of the need for power on collaboration intention. These findings advance understanding of the motivational mechanisms driving online collaboration and underscore the necessity of tailoring engagement strategies to different student groups in management education.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in human behavior reports\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100746\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in human behavior reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825001617\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825001617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在教育和专业环境中,协作越来越被认为是一种核心能力,特别是在当前的管理教育中,在线小组工作已经变得普遍。尽管它很重要,但学生在在线协作学习中的参与度仍然不一致,动机被确定为影响参与的关键因素,但尚未得到充分探索。先前的研究在很大程度上忽视了在数字群体环境中支撑学生意图和实际行为的动机动力学,特别是在不同的学生群体中,如全日制和非全日制MBA学生。为了解决这一差距,我们将麦克利兰的需求理论(包括对成就、关系和权力的需求)与计划行为理论(TPB)结合起来,研究这些动机需求如何塑造学生在在线同伴合作中的意图和行为。我们采用了滞后研究设计,采用两波在线调查和方便抽样,从泰国曼谷四所商学院的279名学生中收集数据。结构方程模型分析实证支持数字对等协作意愿与实际协作之间的u型关系,挑战了传统的线性假设。此外,成就需要和隶属需要对合作意向有正向影响,而权力需要对合作意向无显著影响。在权力需求对合作意向的影响方面,全日制学生与非全日制学生存在差异。这些发现促进了对推动在线协作的动机机制的理解,并强调了在管理教育中为不同学生群体量身定制参与策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Motivation matters: The role of achievement, affiliation, and power needs in digital peer collaboration among business school students
Collaboration is increasingly recognized as a core competency in both educational and professional contexts, particularly within current management education where online group work has become prevalent. Despite its importance, student engagement in online collaborative learning remains inconsistent, with motivation identified as a key but underexplored factor influencing participation. Prior research has largely neglected the motivational dynamics underpinning students' intentions and actual behaviors in digital group settings, especially among diverse student populations such as full-time and part-time MBA students. To address this gap, we integrate McClelland's Theory of Needs (encompassing the needs for achievement, affiliation, and power) with the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to investigate how these motivational needs shape students' intentions and behaviors in online peer collaboration. We adopted a time-lagged research design, using a two-wave online survey and convenience sampling to collect data from 279 students enrolled in four business schools in Bangkok, Thailand. Structural equation modeling analysis empirically supports a U-shaped relationship between digital peer collaboration intention and actual collaboration, challenging traditional linear assumptions. Furthermore, the need for achievement and affiliation positively influenced collaboration intention, whereas the need for power exhibited no significant association. Differences between full-time and part-time students emerged regarding the impact of the need for power on collaboration intention. These findings advance understanding of the motivational mechanisms driving online collaboration and underscore the necessity of tailoring engagement strategies to different student groups in management education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信