93. 一个稳定的方法:评估跌倒的危险因素在老年精神病学诊所

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Kacie Shannon , Kayla Murphy , Lessley Chiriboga , Molly Camp
{"title":"93. 一个稳定的方法:评估跌倒的危险因素在老年精神病学诊所","authors":"Kacie Shannon ,&nbsp;Kayla Murphy ,&nbsp;Lessley Chiriboga ,&nbsp;Molly Camp","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.04.095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Falls are a significant public health concern among older adults, representing the leading cause of disability and a major factor affecting quality of life. The risk of falls is particularly elevated in those with psychiatric conditions. Prior research has identified a correlation between psychiatric medications and fall risk, and further studies have identified medical co-morbidities— such as sleep disorders, neurocognitive impairments, and osteoporosis— as contributing to increased fragility and susceptibility to falls. While prior research has examined these factors individually, there remains a gap in the literature concerning the combined impact of psychiatric conditions, psychiatric medications, and medical co-morbidities on fall risk among older adults receiving psychiatric care. This study aims to fill this gap by using the CDC’s Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) questionnaire to identify key contributors to fall risk in a geriatric psychiatry clinic.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The geriatric psychiatry clinic at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center began administering the STEADI questionnaire with pre-visit check-in forms in September 2023. We extracted data from patients who completed the full questionnaire, including demographics, psychiatric medications, PHQ-9, GAD-7, and CHRT-SR7 scores, as well as diagnoses related to sleep, cognition, and bone health. To assess whether there was a significant difference in STEADI scores between individuals taking specific classes of medications (Yes/No), we conducted two-sample, two-tailed Z-tests for independent means in Microsoft Excel. Given that each group had a sufficiently large sample size (n ≥ 30), we assumed normality under the Central Limit Theorem. We also compared STEADI scores between in-person and virtual visits using the same Z-test approach. Additionally, we examined the relationship between PHQ-9, GAD-7, and CHRT-SR7 mood questionnaires and STEADI scores by performing Shapiro-Wilk normality tests, followed by Spearman correlation analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Data were extracted for 2,055 patients who completed the STEADI questionnaire. The cohort was 64.4% female (1,324 patients) with a mean age of 68.4 years. Racial demographics included 88.8% White (1,825), 7.6% Black (156), 3.0% Asian (62), with the remainder identifying as American Indian, Alaskan Native, Pacific Islander, multiple races, or unknown. Eighty-seven percent (1,783) identified as non-Hispanic, while 8.3% (170) identified as Hispanic. Among encounters, 1,232 were video visits, 726 were in-office visits, 94 were no-shows, and 3 visits were not characterized. Sixty-five percent of STEADI responses (2951 responses) scored ≥ 4, indicating a high fall risk.</div><div>Medication and Fall Risk:</div><div>SSRIs, benzodiazepines, and non-benzo hypnotics did not significantly impact fall risk (z=0.48, z=1.59, and z=-1.46, respectively). Individuals on antipsychotics appeared to have a significantly higher risk of falls (z=5.86, p &lt; 0.001).</div><div>Visit Type and Fall Risk:</div><div>There was not a statistically significant difference in fall risk between visit types (in-office and virtual, z=1.00, p &lt; 0.05).</div><div>Psychological Factors and Fall Risk:</div><div>Shapiro-Wilk tests indicated that GAD-7, PHQ-9, and CHRT-SR7 scores were not normally distributed (p &lt; 0.05). Therefore, Spearman correlation analyses were performed, revealing significant positive correlations between STEADI scores and GAD-7 (ρ = 0.34, p &lt; 0.001), PHQ-9 (ρ = 0.44, p &lt; 0.001), and CHRT-SR7 (ρ = 0.42, p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings provide practical insights to help clinicians better screen for fall risk by considering the unique characteristics of older adults receiving psychiatric care. In total, almost two thirds (65%) were at high risk for falling. The use of antipsychotics was significantly associated with increased fall risk, while SSRIs, benzodiazepines, and non-benzodiazepine hypnotics were not significantly linked to higher fall risk in this study. We identified significant links between fall risk and psychological factors such as anxiety, depression, and hopelessness. These results underscore the importance of integrating fall risk assessment into a comprehensive approach to care in geriatric psychiatry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55534,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"33 10","pages":"Page S69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"93. A STEADI APPROACH: ASSESSING FALL RISK FACTORS IN A GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY CLINIC\",\"authors\":\"Kacie Shannon ,&nbsp;Kayla Murphy ,&nbsp;Lessley Chiriboga ,&nbsp;Molly Camp\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.04.095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Falls are a significant public health concern among older adults, representing the leading cause of disability and a major factor affecting quality of life. The risk of falls is particularly elevated in those with psychiatric conditions. Prior research has identified a correlation between psychiatric medications and fall risk, and further studies have identified medical co-morbidities— such as sleep disorders, neurocognitive impairments, and osteoporosis— as contributing to increased fragility and susceptibility to falls. While prior research has examined these factors individually, there remains a gap in the literature concerning the combined impact of psychiatric conditions, psychiatric medications, and medical co-morbidities on fall risk among older adults receiving psychiatric care. This study aims to fill this gap by using the CDC’s Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) questionnaire to identify key contributors to fall risk in a geriatric psychiatry clinic.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The geriatric psychiatry clinic at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center began administering the STEADI questionnaire with pre-visit check-in forms in September 2023. We extracted data from patients who completed the full questionnaire, including demographics, psychiatric medications, PHQ-9, GAD-7, and CHRT-SR7 scores, as well as diagnoses related to sleep, cognition, and bone health. To assess whether there was a significant difference in STEADI scores between individuals taking specific classes of medications (Yes/No), we conducted two-sample, two-tailed Z-tests for independent means in Microsoft Excel. Given that each group had a sufficiently large sample size (n ≥ 30), we assumed normality under the Central Limit Theorem. We also compared STEADI scores between in-person and virtual visits using the same Z-test approach. Additionally, we examined the relationship between PHQ-9, GAD-7, and CHRT-SR7 mood questionnaires and STEADI scores by performing Shapiro-Wilk normality tests, followed by Spearman correlation analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Data were extracted for 2,055 patients who completed the STEADI questionnaire. The cohort was 64.4% female (1,324 patients) with a mean age of 68.4 years. Racial demographics included 88.8% White (1,825), 7.6% Black (156), 3.0% Asian (62), with the remainder identifying as American Indian, Alaskan Native, Pacific Islander, multiple races, or unknown. Eighty-seven percent (1,783) identified as non-Hispanic, while 8.3% (170) identified as Hispanic. Among encounters, 1,232 were video visits, 726 were in-office visits, 94 were no-shows, and 3 visits were not characterized. Sixty-five percent of STEADI responses (2951 responses) scored ≥ 4, indicating a high fall risk.</div><div>Medication and Fall Risk:</div><div>SSRIs, benzodiazepines, and non-benzo hypnotics did not significantly impact fall risk (z=0.48, z=1.59, and z=-1.46, respectively). Individuals on antipsychotics appeared to have a significantly higher risk of falls (z=5.86, p &lt; 0.001).</div><div>Visit Type and Fall Risk:</div><div>There was not a statistically significant difference in fall risk between visit types (in-office and virtual, z=1.00, p &lt; 0.05).</div><div>Psychological Factors and Fall Risk:</div><div>Shapiro-Wilk tests indicated that GAD-7, PHQ-9, and CHRT-SR7 scores were not normally distributed (p &lt; 0.05). Therefore, Spearman correlation analyses were performed, revealing significant positive correlations between STEADI scores and GAD-7 (ρ = 0.34, p &lt; 0.001), PHQ-9 (ρ = 0.44, p &lt; 0.001), and CHRT-SR7 (ρ = 0.42, p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings provide practical insights to help clinicians better screen for fall risk by considering the unique characteristics of older adults receiving psychiatric care. In total, almost two thirds (65%) were at high risk for falling. The use of antipsychotics was significantly associated with increased fall risk, while SSRIs, benzodiazepines, and non-benzodiazepine hypnotics were not significantly linked to higher fall risk in this study. We identified significant links between fall risk and psychological factors such as anxiety, depression, and hopelessness. These results underscore the importance of integrating fall risk assessment into a comprehensive approach to care in geriatric psychiatry.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"33 10\",\"pages\":\"Page S69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1064748125002052\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1064748125002052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

跌倒是老年人的一个重大公共卫生问题,是导致残疾的主要原因,也是影响生活质量的一个主要因素。有精神疾病的人跌倒的风险尤其高。先前的研究已经确定了精神药物与跌倒风险之间的相关性,进一步的研究已经确定了医学合并症——如睡眠障碍、神经认知障碍和骨质疏松症——会增加跌倒的脆弱性和易感性。虽然先前的研究已经单独检查了这些因素,但关于精神疾病、精神药物和医学合并症对接受精神科治疗的老年人跌倒风险的综合影响的文献仍然存在空白。本研究旨在填补这一空白,通过使用CDC的停止老年人事故,死亡和伤害(STEADI)问卷来确定老年精神病学诊所跌倒风险的主要因素。方法德克萨斯大学西南医学中心老年精神病学门诊于2023年9月开始使用STEADI问卷和预诊登记表。我们从完成完整问卷的患者中提取数据,包括人口统计学、精神药物、PHQ-9、GAD-7和CHRT-SR7评分,以及与睡眠、认知和骨骼健康相关的诊断。为了评估服用特定类别药物的个体之间的STEADI评分是否存在显著差异(是/否),我们在Microsoft Excel中进行了两样本,双尾独立均值z检验。考虑到每组的样本量足够大(n≥30),我们根据中心极限定理假设正态性。我们还使用相同的z检验方法比较了面对面访问和虚拟访问之间的STEADI分数。此外,我们通过夏皮罗-威尔克正态性检验检验了PHQ-9、GAD-7和CHRT-SR7情绪问卷与STEADI评分之间的关系,随后进行了Spearman相关分析。结果2,055名患者完成了STEADI问卷调查,提取了数据。该队列中女性占64.4%(1324例),平均年龄为68.4岁。种族人口统计包括88.8%的白人(1825人),7.6%的黑人(156人),3.0%的亚洲人(62人),其余为美洲印第安人、阿拉斯加原住民、太平洋岛民、多种族或未知。87%(1783人)为非西班牙裔,8.3%(170人)为西班牙裔。在接触中,1232人是视频访问,726人是办公室访问,94人没有出现,3人没有特征。65%的STEADI应答(2951例应答)得分≥4分,表明有较高的跌倒风险。药物和跌倒风险:SSRIs、苯二氮卓类药物和非苯类催眠药对跌倒风险没有显著影响(z=0.48、z=1.59和z=-1.46)。服用抗精神病药物的个体似乎有更高的跌倒风险(z=5.86, p <;0.001)。就诊类型与跌倒风险:不同就诊类型(办公室就诊与虚拟就诊)的跌倒风险差异无统计学意义(z=1.00, p <;0.05)。心理因素与跌倒风险:夏皮罗-威尔克检验显示,GAD-7、PHQ-9和CHRT-SR7评分不呈正态分布(p <;0.05)。因此,进行Spearman相关分析,显示STEADI评分与GAD-7之间存在显著正相关(ρ = 0.34,p <;0.001), PHQ-9 (ρ = 0.44,p <;0.001), CHRT-SR7 (ρ = 0.42,p <;0.001)。结论我们的研究结果为临床医生更好地筛查接受精神科治疗的老年人的跌倒风险提供了实用的见解。总共有近三分之二(65%)的人有摔倒的高风险。在本研究中,抗精神病药物的使用与跌倒风险增加显著相关,而SSRIs、苯二氮卓类药物和非苯二氮卓类催眠药物与跌倒风险增加无显著相关。我们发现跌倒风险与焦虑、抑郁和绝望等心理因素之间存在显著联系。这些结果强调了将跌倒风险评估纳入老年精神病学综合护理方法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
93. A STEADI APPROACH: ASSESSING FALL RISK FACTORS IN A GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY CLINIC

Introduction

Falls are a significant public health concern among older adults, representing the leading cause of disability and a major factor affecting quality of life. The risk of falls is particularly elevated in those with psychiatric conditions. Prior research has identified a correlation between psychiatric medications and fall risk, and further studies have identified medical co-morbidities— such as sleep disorders, neurocognitive impairments, and osteoporosis— as contributing to increased fragility and susceptibility to falls. While prior research has examined these factors individually, there remains a gap in the literature concerning the combined impact of psychiatric conditions, psychiatric medications, and medical co-morbidities on fall risk among older adults receiving psychiatric care. This study aims to fill this gap by using the CDC’s Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) questionnaire to identify key contributors to fall risk in a geriatric psychiatry clinic.

Methods

The geriatric psychiatry clinic at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center began administering the STEADI questionnaire with pre-visit check-in forms in September 2023. We extracted data from patients who completed the full questionnaire, including demographics, psychiatric medications, PHQ-9, GAD-7, and CHRT-SR7 scores, as well as diagnoses related to sleep, cognition, and bone health. To assess whether there was a significant difference in STEADI scores between individuals taking specific classes of medications (Yes/No), we conducted two-sample, two-tailed Z-tests for independent means in Microsoft Excel. Given that each group had a sufficiently large sample size (n ≥ 30), we assumed normality under the Central Limit Theorem. We also compared STEADI scores between in-person and virtual visits using the same Z-test approach. Additionally, we examined the relationship between PHQ-9, GAD-7, and CHRT-SR7 mood questionnaires and STEADI scores by performing Shapiro-Wilk normality tests, followed by Spearman correlation analyses.

Results

Data were extracted for 2,055 patients who completed the STEADI questionnaire. The cohort was 64.4% female (1,324 patients) with a mean age of 68.4 years. Racial demographics included 88.8% White (1,825), 7.6% Black (156), 3.0% Asian (62), with the remainder identifying as American Indian, Alaskan Native, Pacific Islander, multiple races, or unknown. Eighty-seven percent (1,783) identified as non-Hispanic, while 8.3% (170) identified as Hispanic. Among encounters, 1,232 were video visits, 726 were in-office visits, 94 were no-shows, and 3 visits were not characterized. Sixty-five percent of STEADI responses (2951 responses) scored ≥ 4, indicating a high fall risk.
Medication and Fall Risk:
SSRIs, benzodiazepines, and non-benzo hypnotics did not significantly impact fall risk (z=0.48, z=1.59, and z=-1.46, respectively). Individuals on antipsychotics appeared to have a significantly higher risk of falls (z=5.86, p < 0.001).
Visit Type and Fall Risk:
There was not a statistically significant difference in fall risk between visit types (in-office and virtual, z=1.00, p < 0.05).
Psychological Factors and Fall Risk:
Shapiro-Wilk tests indicated that GAD-7, PHQ-9, and CHRT-SR7 scores were not normally distributed (p < 0.05). Therefore, Spearman correlation analyses were performed, revealing significant positive correlations between STEADI scores and GAD-7 (ρ = 0.34, p < 0.001), PHQ-9 (ρ = 0.44, p < 0.001), and CHRT-SR7 (ρ = 0.42, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our findings provide practical insights to help clinicians better screen for fall risk by considering the unique characteristics of older adults receiving psychiatric care. In total, almost two thirds (65%) were at high risk for falling. The use of antipsychotics was significantly associated with increased fall risk, while SSRIs, benzodiazepines, and non-benzodiazepine hypnotics were not significantly linked to higher fall risk in this study. We identified significant links between fall risk and psychological factors such as anxiety, depression, and hopelessness. These results underscore the importance of integrating fall risk assessment into a comprehensive approach to care in geriatric psychiatry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry is the leading source of information in the rapidly evolving field of geriatric psychiatry. This esteemed journal features peer-reviewed articles covering topics such as the diagnosis and classification of psychiatric disorders in older adults, epidemiological and biological correlates of mental health in the elderly, and psychopharmacology and other somatic treatments. Published twelve times a year, the journal serves as an authoritative resource for professionals in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信