{"title":"为哥斯达黎加公共部门建立国家计算机断层扫描诊断参考水平:第一步","authors":"Dagoberto Eloy González-López , Adlin López-Díaz , Fredys Santos-Gutiérrez , Lourdes Salvador-Hernández , Leonel Alberto Torres-Aroche , Simone Kodlulovich-Renha","doi":"10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aim</h3><div>Computed Tomography (CT) is a key tool in medical diagnostics but is associated with significant ionizing radiation exposure, highlighting the need to optimize doses through Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs). The current study aimed to assess CT radiation dose and propose a National Diagnostic Reference Level (NDRL) for the 5 most frequent adult studies using CT dose parameters such as CT Dose Index Volume (CTDI<sub>vol</sub>) and Dose Length Product (DLP) as well as to compare the practices for aforementioned examinations between hospitals in Costa Rica's public sector.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Data from patients and studies developed in 11/12 public hospitals in Costa Rica between January to August 2024 were collected. Procedures performed on adults for five main anatomical regions (head, cervical spine, chest, abdomen-pelvis, and chest-abdomen-pelvis) were analysed, using the 50th and 75th percentiles of dosimetric parameters (CTDI<sub>vol</sub> and DLP) as reference exposure values. The NDRL was achieved from the third quartile of median CTDI<sub>vol</sub> and DLP for each hospital and examination.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The proposed public National Diagnostic Reference Levels (NDRLs) are as follows: for Head examinations, a CTDI<sub>vol</sub> of 52 mGy and a DLP of 1239 mGy cm; for Cervical Spine, 22 mGy and 774 mGy cm; for Chest, 10 mGy and 594 mGy cm; for combined Abdomen-Pelvis studies, 14 mGy and 1283 mGy cm; and for combined Chest-Abdomen-Pelvis studies, 12 mGy and 1498 mGy cm. Overall, these values align with international reference levels in terms of CTDI<sub>vol</sub>; however, notable discrepancies were observed in DLP values—particularly for Chest-Abdomen-Pelvis exams, where the proposed level exceeded the French NDRL by up to 170 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While the NDRLs outlined in this study were generally acceptable and consistent with previously published research, optimizing radiation doses remains imperative, particularly for those equipment and hospitals with values above the reference. This analysis represents the first effort to establish DRLs in Costa Rica, providing a robust foundation for optimizing radiological safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8096,"journal":{"name":"Applied Radiation and Isotopes","volume":"225 ","pages":"Article 112043"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Setting up a national diagnostic reference level for computed tomography for the public sector in Costa Rica: first step\",\"authors\":\"Dagoberto Eloy González-López , Adlin López-Díaz , Fredys Santos-Gutiérrez , Lourdes Salvador-Hernández , Leonel Alberto Torres-Aroche , Simone Kodlulovich-Renha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and aim</h3><div>Computed Tomography (CT) is a key tool in medical diagnostics but is associated with significant ionizing radiation exposure, highlighting the need to optimize doses through Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs). The current study aimed to assess CT radiation dose and propose a National Diagnostic Reference Level (NDRL) for the 5 most frequent adult studies using CT dose parameters such as CT Dose Index Volume (CTDI<sub>vol</sub>) and Dose Length Product (DLP) as well as to compare the practices for aforementioned examinations between hospitals in Costa Rica's public sector.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Data from patients and studies developed in 11/12 public hospitals in Costa Rica between January to August 2024 were collected. Procedures performed on adults for five main anatomical regions (head, cervical spine, chest, abdomen-pelvis, and chest-abdomen-pelvis) were analysed, using the 50th and 75th percentiles of dosimetric parameters (CTDI<sub>vol</sub> and DLP) as reference exposure values. The NDRL was achieved from the third quartile of median CTDI<sub>vol</sub> and DLP for each hospital and examination.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The proposed public National Diagnostic Reference Levels (NDRLs) are as follows: for Head examinations, a CTDI<sub>vol</sub> of 52 mGy and a DLP of 1239 mGy cm; for Cervical Spine, 22 mGy and 774 mGy cm; for Chest, 10 mGy and 594 mGy cm; for combined Abdomen-Pelvis studies, 14 mGy and 1283 mGy cm; and for combined Chest-Abdomen-Pelvis studies, 12 mGy and 1498 mGy cm. Overall, these values align with international reference levels in terms of CTDI<sub>vol</sub>; however, notable discrepancies were observed in DLP values—particularly for Chest-Abdomen-Pelvis exams, where the proposed level exceeded the French NDRL by up to 170 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While the NDRLs outlined in this study were generally acceptable and consistent with previously published research, optimizing radiation doses remains imperative, particularly for those equipment and hospitals with values above the reference. This analysis represents the first effort to establish DRLs in Costa Rica, providing a robust foundation for optimizing radiological safety.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Radiation and Isotopes\",\"volume\":\"225 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112043\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Radiation and Isotopes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969804325003884\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Radiation and Isotopes","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969804325003884","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
Setting up a national diagnostic reference level for computed tomography for the public sector in Costa Rica: first step
Background and aim
Computed Tomography (CT) is a key tool in medical diagnostics but is associated with significant ionizing radiation exposure, highlighting the need to optimize doses through Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs). The current study aimed to assess CT radiation dose and propose a National Diagnostic Reference Level (NDRL) for the 5 most frequent adult studies using CT dose parameters such as CT Dose Index Volume (CTDIvol) and Dose Length Product (DLP) as well as to compare the practices for aforementioned examinations between hospitals in Costa Rica's public sector.
Materials and methods
Data from patients and studies developed in 11/12 public hospitals in Costa Rica between January to August 2024 were collected. Procedures performed on adults for five main anatomical regions (head, cervical spine, chest, abdomen-pelvis, and chest-abdomen-pelvis) were analysed, using the 50th and 75th percentiles of dosimetric parameters (CTDIvol and DLP) as reference exposure values. The NDRL was achieved from the third quartile of median CTDIvol and DLP for each hospital and examination.
Results
The proposed public National Diagnostic Reference Levels (NDRLs) are as follows: for Head examinations, a CTDIvol of 52 mGy and a DLP of 1239 mGy cm; for Cervical Spine, 22 mGy and 774 mGy cm; for Chest, 10 mGy and 594 mGy cm; for combined Abdomen-Pelvis studies, 14 mGy and 1283 mGy cm; and for combined Chest-Abdomen-Pelvis studies, 12 mGy and 1498 mGy cm. Overall, these values align with international reference levels in terms of CTDIvol; however, notable discrepancies were observed in DLP values—particularly for Chest-Abdomen-Pelvis exams, where the proposed level exceeded the French NDRL by up to 170 %.
Conclusion
While the NDRLs outlined in this study were generally acceptable and consistent with previously published research, optimizing radiation doses remains imperative, particularly for those equipment and hospitals with values above the reference. This analysis represents the first effort to establish DRLs in Costa Rica, providing a robust foundation for optimizing radiological safety.
期刊介绍:
Applied Radiation and Isotopes provides a high quality medium for the publication of substantial, original and scientific and technological papers on the development and peaceful application of nuclear, radiation and radionuclide techniques in chemistry, physics, biochemistry, biology, medicine, security, engineering and in the earth, planetary and environmental sciences, all including dosimetry. Nuclear techniques are defined in the broadest sense and both experimental and theoretical papers are welcome. They include the development and use of α- and β-particles, X-rays and γ-rays, neutrons and other nuclear particles and radiations from all sources, including radionuclides, synchrotron sources, cyclotrons and reactors and from the natural environment.
The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria.
Papers dealing with radiation processing, i.e., where radiation is used to bring about a biological, chemical or physical change in a material, should be directed to our sister journal Radiation Physics and Chemistry.