Xiaolong Ma, Jiayue Chang, Xinru Chai, Yan Liu, Jianming Li
{"title":"不同机械化种植布局下温室番茄冠层光环境、光合作用及果实综合性能评价","authors":"Xiaolong Ma, Jiayue Chang, Xinru Chai, Yan Liu, Jianming Li","doi":"10.1016/j.hpj.2025.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Plant layout is critical for the formation of canopy microenvironment, and fruit yield and quality. Plant-layout designs that meet the requirements of photosynthetically efficient and mechanizable greenhouse cultivation are urgently needed. Here, we report our findings from a two-year trial using tomatoes grown in a plastic film greenhouse at high planting density (HPD, 4.55 plants · m<ce:sup loc=\"post\">−2</ce:sup>) or low planting density (LPD, 3.13 plants · m<ce:sup loc=\"post\">−2</ce:sup>). Each density comprised south-north (SN) and east-west (EW) row orientations, with three plant layouts (S1–S3 or E1-E3, S and E represent SN and EW row orientations, respectively) in each orientation: 90 cm + 35 cm + 35 cm, 90 cm + 60 cm + 30 cm, and 90 cm + 90 cm + 25 cm for HPD; and 120 cm + 40 cm + 40 cm, 120 cm + 60 cm + 36 cm, and 120 cm + 120 cm + 27 cm for LPD. Analysis included canopy accumulated light absorption (ACL), photosynthesis (ACP), and light uniformity (UC<ce:inf loc=\"post\">LP</ce:inf>) conducted using a three-dimensional canopy photosynthesis model, along with individual fruit indices, and a comprehensive evaluation using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Plants grown under S2 and E2 exhibited respective dominance in both planting densities compared to those grown under any other treatment. Particularly, S2 showed higher ACL and single fruit weight, whereas E2 showed superior UC<ce:inf loc=\"post\">LP</ce:inf>, comprehensive fruit quality, and fruit uniformity. Therefore, E2 was identified as an optimal plant configuration for both HPD and LPD based on overall fruit performance as evaluated using the TOPSIS method. Correlation analysis indicated that the light environment of the lower canopy layer under HPD and that of the middle canopy layer under LPD showed the strongest correlations with the main fruit indices. Overall, the optimal plant layout identified herein provides valuable decision support for horticultural production under mechanized planting conditions. The correlations between canopy light and fruit indices define quantitative breeding and management targets for optimizing fruit performance through adjustments in plant structure.","PeriodicalId":13178,"journal":{"name":"Horticultural Plant Journal","volume":"205 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the canopy light environment, photosynthesis, and fruit comprehensive performance of greenhouse tomato under different mechanized planting layouts\",\"authors\":\"Xiaolong Ma, Jiayue Chang, Xinru Chai, Yan Liu, Jianming Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hpj.2025.03.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Plant layout is critical for the formation of canopy microenvironment, and fruit yield and quality. Plant-layout designs that meet the requirements of photosynthetically efficient and mechanizable greenhouse cultivation are urgently needed. Here, we report our findings from a two-year trial using tomatoes grown in a plastic film greenhouse at high planting density (HPD, 4.55 plants · m<ce:sup loc=\\\"post\\\">−2</ce:sup>) or low planting density (LPD, 3.13 plants · m<ce:sup loc=\\\"post\\\">−2</ce:sup>). Each density comprised south-north (SN) and east-west (EW) row orientations, with three plant layouts (S1–S3 or E1-E3, S and E represent SN and EW row orientations, respectively) in each orientation: 90 cm + 35 cm + 35 cm, 90 cm + 60 cm + 30 cm, and 90 cm + 90 cm + 25 cm for HPD; and 120 cm + 40 cm + 40 cm, 120 cm + 60 cm + 36 cm, and 120 cm + 120 cm + 27 cm for LPD. Analysis included canopy accumulated light absorption (ACL), photosynthesis (ACP), and light uniformity (UC<ce:inf loc=\\\"post\\\">LP</ce:inf>) conducted using a three-dimensional canopy photosynthesis model, along with individual fruit indices, and a comprehensive evaluation using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Plants grown under S2 and E2 exhibited respective dominance in both planting densities compared to those grown under any other treatment. Particularly, S2 showed higher ACL and single fruit weight, whereas E2 showed superior UC<ce:inf loc=\\\"post\\\">LP</ce:inf>, comprehensive fruit quality, and fruit uniformity. Therefore, E2 was identified as an optimal plant configuration for both HPD and LPD based on overall fruit performance as evaluated using the TOPSIS method. Correlation analysis indicated that the light environment of the lower canopy layer under HPD and that of the middle canopy layer under LPD showed the strongest correlations with the main fruit indices. Overall, the optimal plant layout identified herein provides valuable decision support for horticultural production under mechanized planting conditions. The correlations between canopy light and fruit indices define quantitative breeding and management targets for optimizing fruit performance through adjustments in plant structure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Horticultural Plant Journal\",\"volume\":\"205 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Horticultural Plant Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpj.2025.03.010\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HORTICULTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Horticultural Plant Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpj.2025.03.010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HORTICULTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
植株布局对冠层微环境的形成、果实的产量和品质至关重要。迫切需要满足光合高效和机械化温室栽培要求的植物布置设计。在这里,我们报告了一项为期两年的试验结果,该试验使用在高种植密度(HPD, 4.55株·m−2)或低种植密度(LPD, 3.13株·m−2)的塑料薄膜温室中种植的西红柿。每个密度由南北向(SN)和东西向(EW)组成,每个方向有三种植物布局(S1-S3或E1-E3, S和E分别代表SN和EW行方向):HPD为90 cm + 35 cm + 35 cm, 90 cm + 60 cm + 30 cm和90 cm + 90 cm + 25 cm;LPD为120cm + 40cm + 40cm、120cm + 60cm + 36cm、120cm + 120cm + 27cm。利用三维冠层光合作用模型进行树冠累积光吸收(ACL)、光合作用(ACP)和光均匀度(UCLP)分析,结合单果指数,利用TOPSIS (Order Preference by Similarity to a Ideal Solution)进行综合评价。与其他处理相比,S2和E2处理在两种密度上均表现出优势。其中,S2表现出较高的ACL和单果重,E2表现出较好的UCLP、果实综合品质和均匀性。因此,根据TOPSIS方法评估的整体果实性能,E2被确定为HPD和LPD的最佳植株配置。相关分析表明,高低温下冠层下部光环境和低低温下冠层中部光环境与主要果实指标的相关性最强。总体而言,本文确定的最优植物布局为机械化种植条件下的园艺生产提供了有价值的决策支持。冠层光与果实指标的相关性确定了通过调整植株结构来优化果实性能的定量育种和管理目标。
Evaluating the canopy light environment, photosynthesis, and fruit comprehensive performance of greenhouse tomato under different mechanized planting layouts
Plant layout is critical for the formation of canopy microenvironment, and fruit yield and quality. Plant-layout designs that meet the requirements of photosynthetically efficient and mechanizable greenhouse cultivation are urgently needed. Here, we report our findings from a two-year trial using tomatoes grown in a plastic film greenhouse at high planting density (HPD, 4.55 plants · m−2) or low planting density (LPD, 3.13 plants · m−2). Each density comprised south-north (SN) and east-west (EW) row orientations, with three plant layouts (S1–S3 or E1-E3, S and E represent SN and EW row orientations, respectively) in each orientation: 90 cm + 35 cm + 35 cm, 90 cm + 60 cm + 30 cm, and 90 cm + 90 cm + 25 cm for HPD; and 120 cm + 40 cm + 40 cm, 120 cm + 60 cm + 36 cm, and 120 cm + 120 cm + 27 cm for LPD. Analysis included canopy accumulated light absorption (ACL), photosynthesis (ACP), and light uniformity (UCLP) conducted using a three-dimensional canopy photosynthesis model, along with individual fruit indices, and a comprehensive evaluation using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Plants grown under S2 and E2 exhibited respective dominance in both planting densities compared to those grown under any other treatment. Particularly, S2 showed higher ACL and single fruit weight, whereas E2 showed superior UCLP, comprehensive fruit quality, and fruit uniformity. Therefore, E2 was identified as an optimal plant configuration for both HPD and LPD based on overall fruit performance as evaluated using the TOPSIS method. Correlation analysis indicated that the light environment of the lower canopy layer under HPD and that of the middle canopy layer under LPD showed the strongest correlations with the main fruit indices. Overall, the optimal plant layout identified herein provides valuable decision support for horticultural production under mechanized planting conditions. The correlations between canopy light and fruit indices define quantitative breeding and management targets for optimizing fruit performance through adjustments in plant structure.
期刊介绍:
Horticultural Plant Journal (HPJ) is an OPEN ACCESS international journal. HPJ publishes research related to all horticultural plants, including fruits, vegetables, ornamental plants, tea plants, and medicinal plants, etc. The journal covers all aspects of horticultural crop sciences, including germplasm resources, genetics and breeding, tillage and cultivation, physiology and biochemistry, ecology, genomics, biotechnology, plant protection, postharvest processing, etc. Article types include Original research papers, Reviews, and Short communications.