{"title":"地缘政治风险正在重塑全球能源贸易网络吗?全球视角","authors":"Youyi Deng , Hong-Dian Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, the rise of the anti-globalization wave and multiple changes in international relations have intensified geopolitical risks (GPR), which bring uncertainty and instability to the global energy market and accelerate the evolution of the global energy trade networks (GETN). Based on this, this paper portrays the evolution of GETN by constructing a weighted directed trade network with a sample of 41 countries around the world from 2000 to 2022, and explores the impact and mechanisms of GPR on GETN. The findings show that (1) GETN presents three major trade circles: the European energy trade network, the Oceania-Asia energy trade network, and the Americas energy trade network. However, the Oceania-Asia energy trade network is gradually expanding due to the different development stages and speeds. (2) GPR has weakened the centrality of countries in GETN, and the impact is mainly realized through the reduction of trade scale. (3) Financial development and the advancement of the digitalization process can provide financial support and digital risk monitoring services for countries to participate in the GETN, which mitigates the negative impact of the GPR to a certain extent. (4) Testing for spatiotemporal heterogeneity finds that the current GETN is developing towards regionalization, with the formation of the European-Americas energy trade network and the Eurasian energy trade network.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 108717"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are geopolitical risks reshaping the global energy trade networks? A global perspective\",\"authors\":\"Youyi Deng , Hong-Dian Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In recent years, the rise of the anti-globalization wave and multiple changes in international relations have intensified geopolitical risks (GPR), which bring uncertainty and instability to the global energy market and accelerate the evolution of the global energy trade networks (GETN). Based on this, this paper portrays the evolution of GETN by constructing a weighted directed trade network with a sample of 41 countries around the world from 2000 to 2022, and explores the impact and mechanisms of GPR on GETN. The findings show that (1) GETN presents three major trade circles: the European energy trade network, the Oceania-Asia energy trade network, and the Americas energy trade network. However, the Oceania-Asia energy trade network is gradually expanding due to the different development stages and speeds. (2) GPR has weakened the centrality of countries in GETN, and the impact is mainly realized through the reduction of trade scale. (3) Financial development and the advancement of the digitalization process can provide financial support and digital risk monitoring services for countries to participate in the GETN, which mitigates the negative impact of the GPR to a certain extent. (4) Testing for spatiotemporal heterogeneity finds that the current GETN is developing towards regionalization, with the formation of the European-Americas energy trade network and the Eurasian energy trade network.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"149 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108717\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325005444\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325005444","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Are geopolitical risks reshaping the global energy trade networks? A global perspective
In recent years, the rise of the anti-globalization wave and multiple changes in international relations have intensified geopolitical risks (GPR), which bring uncertainty and instability to the global energy market and accelerate the evolution of the global energy trade networks (GETN). Based on this, this paper portrays the evolution of GETN by constructing a weighted directed trade network with a sample of 41 countries around the world from 2000 to 2022, and explores the impact and mechanisms of GPR on GETN. The findings show that (1) GETN presents three major trade circles: the European energy trade network, the Oceania-Asia energy trade network, and the Americas energy trade network. However, the Oceania-Asia energy trade network is gradually expanding due to the different development stages and speeds. (2) GPR has weakened the centrality of countries in GETN, and the impact is mainly realized through the reduction of trade scale. (3) Financial development and the advancement of the digitalization process can provide financial support and digital risk monitoring services for countries to participate in the GETN, which mitigates the negative impact of the GPR to a certain extent. (4) Testing for spatiotemporal heterogeneity finds that the current GETN is developing towards regionalization, with the formation of the European-Americas energy trade network and the Eurasian energy trade network.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.