Armaan F. Akbar BS , Alice L. Zhou MS , Jessica M. Ruck MD, PhD , Chetan Pasrija MD, Antonio Polanco MD, Ahmet Kilic MD
{"title":"体外灌注心脏移植在全国的应用及效果。","authors":"Armaan F. Akbar BS , Alice L. Zhou MS , Jessica M. Ruck MD, PhD , Chetan Pasrija MD, Antonio Polanco MD, Ahmet Kilic MD","doi":"10.1016/j.healun.2025.06.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In recent years, machine perfusion (MP) for heart transplantation has been increasingly adopted in the United States. However, pragmatic national studies on the utilization and outcomes of this practice are lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adult (≥18 years) heart recipients transplanted between October 18, 2018 and September 30, 2023 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were included. We compared outcomes of MP and non-MP transplants among donation after brain death (DBD) and circulatory death (DCD) donors. We used Cox regression to evaluate survival at 30 days and 1 year post-transplant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 13,500 DBD transplants, 403 (3.0%) utilized MP. Donors of MP vs non-MP grafts were older (34 vs 32 years, <em>p</em> = 0.003) and traveled longer distances to the recipient center (478 vs 228 nautical miles, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Recipients of MP vs non-MP DBD grafts had increased risk of predischarge dialysis (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.33 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.75], <em>p</em> = 0.04) and predischarge stroke (aOR 1.66 [95% CI: 1.08-2.55], <em>p</em> = 0.02), but similar hazards of mortality at 30 days (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.01 [95% CI: 0.54-1.86], <em>p</em> = 0.99) and 1 year (aHR 0.98 [95% CI: 0.66-1.43], <em>p</em> = 0.90). Of 976 DCD transplants, 633 (64.9%) utilized MP. Recipients of MP vs non-MP DCD grafts had similar risks of dialysis (aOR 1.19 [95% CI: 0.82-1.72], <em>p</em> = 0.36) and stroke (aOR 1.68 [95% CI: 0.82-3.49, <em>p</em> = 0.16), and similar hazard of 30-day (aHR 1.62 [95% CI: 0.67-3.94], <em>p</em> = 0.28), and 1-year mortality (aHR 0.91 [95% CI: 0.54-1.54], <em>p</em> = 0.73).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MP use in heart transplantation was associated with favorable outcomes, suggesting it has the potential to increase donor heart utilization, particularly for donors with long projected ischemic times.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","volume":"44 11","pages":"Pages 1714-1724"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National utilization and outcomes of heart transplantation using ex situ machine perfusion\",\"authors\":\"Armaan F. Akbar BS , Alice L. Zhou MS , Jessica M. Ruck MD, PhD , Chetan Pasrija MD, Antonio Polanco MD, Ahmet Kilic MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healun.2025.06.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In recent years, machine perfusion (MP) for heart transplantation has been increasingly adopted in the United States. However, pragmatic national studies on the utilization and outcomes of this practice are lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adult (≥18 years) heart recipients transplanted between October 18, 2018 and September 30, 2023 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were included. We compared outcomes of MP and non-MP transplants among donation after brain death (DBD) and circulatory death (DCD) donors. We used Cox regression to evaluate survival at 30 days and 1 year post-transplant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 13,500 DBD transplants, 403 (3.0%) utilized MP. Donors of MP vs non-MP grafts were older (34 vs 32 years, <em>p</em> = 0.003) and traveled longer distances to the recipient center (478 vs 228 nautical miles, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Recipients of MP vs non-MP DBD grafts had increased risk of predischarge dialysis (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.33 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.75], <em>p</em> = 0.04) and predischarge stroke (aOR 1.66 [95% CI: 1.08-2.55], <em>p</em> = 0.02), but similar hazards of mortality at 30 days (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.01 [95% CI: 0.54-1.86], <em>p</em> = 0.99) and 1 year (aHR 0.98 [95% CI: 0.66-1.43], <em>p</em> = 0.90). Of 976 DCD transplants, 633 (64.9%) utilized MP. Recipients of MP vs non-MP DCD grafts had similar risks of dialysis (aOR 1.19 [95% CI: 0.82-1.72], <em>p</em> = 0.36) and stroke (aOR 1.68 [95% CI: 0.82-3.49, <em>p</em> = 0.16), and similar hazard of 30-day (aHR 1.62 [95% CI: 0.67-3.94], <em>p</em> = 0.28), and 1-year mortality (aHR 0.91 [95% CI: 0.54-1.54], <em>p</em> = 0.73).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MP use in heart transplantation was associated with favorable outcomes, suggesting it has the potential to increase donor heart utilization, particularly for donors with long projected ischemic times.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"44 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1714-1724\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053249825021023\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053249825021023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
National utilization and outcomes of heart transplantation using ex situ machine perfusion
Background
In recent years, machine perfusion (MP) for heart transplantation has been increasingly adopted in the United States. However, pragmatic national studies on the utilization and outcomes of this practice are lacking.
Methods
Adult (≥18 years) heart recipients transplanted between October 18, 2018 and September 30, 2023 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were included. We compared outcomes of MP and non-MP transplants among donation after brain death (DBD) and circulatory death (DCD) donors. We used Cox regression to evaluate survival at 30 days and 1 year post-transplant.
Results
Of 13,500 DBD transplants, 403 (3.0%) utilized MP. Donors of MP vs non-MP grafts were older (34 vs 32 years, p = 0.003) and traveled longer distances to the recipient center (478 vs 228 nautical miles, p < 0.001). Recipients of MP vs non-MP DBD grafts had increased risk of predischarge dialysis (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.33 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.75], p = 0.04) and predischarge stroke (aOR 1.66 [95% CI: 1.08-2.55], p = 0.02), but similar hazards of mortality at 30 days (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.01 [95% CI: 0.54-1.86], p = 0.99) and 1 year (aHR 0.98 [95% CI: 0.66-1.43], p = 0.90). Of 976 DCD transplants, 633 (64.9%) utilized MP. Recipients of MP vs non-MP DCD grafts had similar risks of dialysis (aOR 1.19 [95% CI: 0.82-1.72], p = 0.36) and stroke (aOR 1.68 [95% CI: 0.82-3.49, p = 0.16), and similar hazard of 30-day (aHR 1.62 [95% CI: 0.67-3.94], p = 0.28), and 1-year mortality (aHR 0.91 [95% CI: 0.54-1.54], p = 0.73).
Conclusions
MP use in heart transplantation was associated with favorable outcomes, suggesting it has the potential to increase donor heart utilization, particularly for donors with long projected ischemic times.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, the official publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, brings readers essential scholarly and timely information in the field of cardio-pulmonary transplantation, mechanical and biological support of the failing heart, advanced lung disease (including pulmonary vascular disease) and cell replacement therapy. Importantly, the journal also serves as a medium of communication of pre-clinical sciences in all these rapidly expanding areas.