听觉与视觉情态在普通话焦点知觉中的作用。

IF 2.2
Shanpeng Li, Yihan Wu, Sasha Calhoun, Mengzhu Yan
{"title":"听觉与视觉情态在普通话焦点知觉中的作用。","authors":"Shanpeng Li, Yihan Wu, Sasha Calhoun, Mengzhu Yan","doi":"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Speech perception is a complex process that involves multiple sensory modalities. Despite our intuitions of speech as something we hear, accumulating evidence has shown that speech perception is not solely dependent on the auditory modality. While it is well established that auditory and visual cues can both help listeners perceive focus, the latter is not established in Mandarin, and the relative contribution of these cues is not established at all. The current study investigated Mandarin listeners' integration of auditory and visual cues in the interpretation of focus in noise-degraded speech, through a question-answer appropriateness rating experiment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>To explore the effectiveness and relative contribution of auditory and visual modality in the interpretation of Mandarin focus, participants did a question-answer appropriateness rating task involving subject focus, object focus, and broad focus. All the question-answer pairs were constructed in three modalities: audio only, visual only, and audiovisual. They were instructed to rate the appropriateness of the question-answer pairs. A babble noise was superimposed on the audio track for the audio only and audiovisual conditions.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>Although auditory cues via prosodic prominence were an effective cue to interpreting focus, visual cues were proven more effective, at least with degraded audio. Overall, this research contributes to our understanding of the interaction between linguistic cues and sensory information during language comprehension, widens the range of languages included in this body of research, and provides important implications for future studies on focus processing in various linguistic contexts and communication settings. This, in turn, will deepen our understanding of the multimodal nature of language comprehension.</p>","PeriodicalId":520690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Auditory and Visual Modality in Perception of Focus in Mandarin Chinese.\",\"authors\":\"Shanpeng Li, Yihan Wu, Sasha Calhoun, Mengzhu Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Speech perception is a complex process that involves multiple sensory modalities. Despite our intuitions of speech as something we hear, accumulating evidence has shown that speech perception is not solely dependent on the auditory modality. While it is well established that auditory and visual cues can both help listeners perceive focus, the latter is not established in Mandarin, and the relative contribution of these cues is not established at all. The current study investigated Mandarin listeners' integration of auditory and visual cues in the interpretation of focus in noise-degraded speech, through a question-answer appropriateness rating experiment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>To explore the effectiveness and relative contribution of auditory and visual modality in the interpretation of Mandarin focus, participants did a question-answer appropriateness rating task involving subject focus, object focus, and broad focus. All the question-answer pairs were constructed in three modalities: audio only, visual only, and audiovisual. They were instructed to rate the appropriateness of the question-answer pairs. A babble noise was superimposed on the audio track for the audio only and audiovisual conditions.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>Although auditory cues via prosodic prominence were an effective cue to interpreting focus, visual cues were proven more effective, at least with degraded audio. Overall, this research contributes to our understanding of the interaction between linguistic cues and sensory information during language comprehension, widens the range of languages included in this body of research, and provides important implications for future studies on focus processing in various linguistic contexts and communication settings. This, in turn, will deepen our understanding of the multimodal nature of language comprehension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00664\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:语音感知是一个涉及多种感觉方式的复杂过程。尽管我们的直觉认为语言是我们听到的东西,但越来越多的证据表明,语言感知并不仅仅依赖于听觉模式。虽然听觉和视觉线索都可以帮助听者感知焦点,但后者在普通话中没有建立,并且这些线索的相对贡献根本没有建立。本研究通过问答适当性评价实验,考察了普通话听者在低噪声语音焦点解释中听觉和视觉线索的整合情况。方法:为探讨听觉模态和视觉模态在普通话焦点解释中的有效性和相对贡献,被试进行了包括主题焦点、对象焦点和广义焦点的问答性适当性评定任务。所有的问答对都以三种方式构建:纯音频、纯视频和视听。他们被要求对问答对的适当性进行评分。在纯音频和视听条件下,在音轨上叠加了一个咿呀学语噪声。结果和结论:虽然通过韵律突出的听觉线索是解释焦点的有效线索,但视觉线索被证明更有效,至少在退化的音频中是如此。总的来说,本研究有助于我们理解语言理解过程中语言线索和感觉信息之间的相互作用,拓宽了本研究的语言范围,并为未来在各种语言语境和交际环境下的焦点加工研究提供了重要启示。反过来,这将加深我们对语言理解的多模态本质的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Auditory and Visual Modality in Perception of Focus in Mandarin Chinese.

Purpose: Speech perception is a complex process that involves multiple sensory modalities. Despite our intuitions of speech as something we hear, accumulating evidence has shown that speech perception is not solely dependent on the auditory modality. While it is well established that auditory and visual cues can both help listeners perceive focus, the latter is not established in Mandarin, and the relative contribution of these cues is not established at all. The current study investigated Mandarin listeners' integration of auditory and visual cues in the interpretation of focus in noise-degraded speech, through a question-answer appropriateness rating experiment.

Method: To explore the effectiveness and relative contribution of auditory and visual modality in the interpretation of Mandarin focus, participants did a question-answer appropriateness rating task involving subject focus, object focus, and broad focus. All the question-answer pairs were constructed in three modalities: audio only, visual only, and audiovisual. They were instructed to rate the appropriateness of the question-answer pairs. A babble noise was superimposed on the audio track for the audio only and audiovisual conditions.

Results and conclusions: Although auditory cues via prosodic prominence were an effective cue to interpreting focus, visual cues were proven more effective, at least with degraded audio. Overall, this research contributes to our understanding of the interaction between linguistic cues and sensory information during language comprehension, widens the range of languages included in this body of research, and provides important implications for future studies on focus processing in various linguistic contexts and communication settings. This, in turn, will deepen our understanding of the multimodal nature of language comprehension.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信