乳酸和碱缺乏在预测外伤性凝血功能障碍中的作用。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-07-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0327321
Wook Tae Yang, Il Jae Wang, Suck Ju Cho, Seok-Ran Yeom, Sung-Wook Park, Won Ung Tae, Tae Sik Goh, Up Huh, Dongman Ryu, Chanhee Song, Young Mo Cho
{"title":"乳酸和碱缺乏在预测外伤性凝血功能障碍中的作用。","authors":"Wook Tae Yang, Il Jae Wang, Suck Ju Cho, Seok-Ran Yeom, Sung-Wook Park, Won Ung Tae, Tae Sik Goh, Up Huh, Dongman Ryu, Chanhee Song, Young Mo Cho","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0327321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Timely and accurate initial assessment of trauma patients can significantly affect future outcomes. This study aimed to compare the predictive value of the lactate level and base deficit for traumatic coagulopathy, in-hospital mortality, and massive transfusion. This retrospective, observational, single-center study included patients who visited a trauma center from 2016 to 2020. The primary outcome was traumatic coagulopathy, and the secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and massive transfusion. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether the lactate level and base deficit were independent risk factors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated to assess the predictive value of lactate and base deficit. In total, 4,379 patients were included in the study. In the logistic regression analysis, base deficit was identified as an independent risk factor for traumatic coagulopathy, whereas lactate was not. Regarding in-hospital mortality, the lactate level was an independent risk factor, whereas base deficit was not. The area under the curve values for predicting traumatic coagulopathy using lactate levels and base deficit were 0.710 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.696-0.723) and 0.756 (95% CI, 0.743-0.769), respectively; this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.0001; 95% CI, 0.030-0.0622). Base deficit excelled in traumatic coagulopathy prediction, whereas lactate levels prevailed in mortality prediction. Both markers warrant careful observation in the assessment and management of patients with trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 7","pages":"e0327321"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12250580/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Roles of lactate and base deficit in predicting traumatic coagulopathy.\",\"authors\":\"Wook Tae Yang, Il Jae Wang, Suck Ju Cho, Seok-Ran Yeom, Sung-Wook Park, Won Ung Tae, Tae Sik Goh, Up Huh, Dongman Ryu, Chanhee Song, Young Mo Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0327321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Timely and accurate initial assessment of trauma patients can significantly affect future outcomes. This study aimed to compare the predictive value of the lactate level and base deficit for traumatic coagulopathy, in-hospital mortality, and massive transfusion. This retrospective, observational, single-center study included patients who visited a trauma center from 2016 to 2020. The primary outcome was traumatic coagulopathy, and the secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and massive transfusion. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether the lactate level and base deficit were independent risk factors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated to assess the predictive value of lactate and base deficit. In total, 4,379 patients were included in the study. In the logistic regression analysis, base deficit was identified as an independent risk factor for traumatic coagulopathy, whereas lactate was not. Regarding in-hospital mortality, the lactate level was an independent risk factor, whereas base deficit was not. The area under the curve values for predicting traumatic coagulopathy using lactate levels and base deficit were 0.710 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.696-0.723) and 0.756 (95% CI, 0.743-0.769), respectively; this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.0001; 95% CI, 0.030-0.0622). Base deficit excelled in traumatic coagulopathy prediction, whereas lactate levels prevailed in mortality prediction. Both markers warrant careful observation in the assessment and management of patients with trauma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 7\",\"pages\":\"e0327321\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12250580/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327321\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327321","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对创伤患者进行及时准确的初步评估可以显著影响未来的预后。本研究旨在比较乳酸水平和基础缺陷对创伤性凝血功能障碍、住院死亡率和大量输血的预测价值。这项回顾性、观察性、单中心研究纳入了2016年至2020年在创伤中心就诊的患者。主要结局是外伤性凝血功能障碍,次要结局是住院死亡率和大量输血。通过Logistic回归分析确定乳酸水平和碱性缺陷是否是独立的危险因素。计算受试者工作特征曲线下的面积,以评估乳酸和碱性赤字的预测价值。总共有4379名患者参与了这项研究。在logistic回归分析中,碱基缺陷被确定为创伤性凝血功能障碍的独立危险因素,而乳酸则不是。关于住院死亡率,乳酸水平是一个独立的危险因素,而基础缺陷不是。使用乳酸水平和基础缺陷预测外伤性凝血功能的曲线下面积值分别为0.710(95%可信区间[CI], 0.696-0.723)和0.756 (95% CI, 0.743-0.769);差异有统计学意义(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Roles of lactate and base deficit in predicting traumatic coagulopathy.

Roles of lactate and base deficit in predicting traumatic coagulopathy.

Roles of lactate and base deficit in predicting traumatic coagulopathy.

Roles of lactate and base deficit in predicting traumatic coagulopathy.

Timely and accurate initial assessment of trauma patients can significantly affect future outcomes. This study aimed to compare the predictive value of the lactate level and base deficit for traumatic coagulopathy, in-hospital mortality, and massive transfusion. This retrospective, observational, single-center study included patients who visited a trauma center from 2016 to 2020. The primary outcome was traumatic coagulopathy, and the secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and massive transfusion. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether the lactate level and base deficit were independent risk factors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated to assess the predictive value of lactate and base deficit. In total, 4,379 patients were included in the study. In the logistic regression analysis, base deficit was identified as an independent risk factor for traumatic coagulopathy, whereas lactate was not. Regarding in-hospital mortality, the lactate level was an independent risk factor, whereas base deficit was not. The area under the curve values for predicting traumatic coagulopathy using lactate levels and base deficit were 0.710 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.696-0.723) and 0.756 (95% CI, 0.743-0.769), respectively; this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.0001; 95% CI, 0.030-0.0622). Base deficit excelled in traumatic coagulopathy prediction, whereas lactate levels prevailed in mortality prediction. Both markers warrant careful observation in the assessment and management of patients with trauma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信