海南岛是否经历了明显的新生代构造位移,影响了其生物群的来源和演化?

IF 3.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Pei-Han Huang, Yi-Gang Song, Jie Li, Hong-Hu Meng
{"title":"海南岛是否经历了明显的新生代构造位移,影响了其生物群的来源和演化?","authors":"Pei-Han Huang,&nbsp;Yi-Gang Song,&nbsp;Jie Li,&nbsp;Hong-Hu Meng","doi":"10.1111/jbi.15168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>A significant Cenozoic tectonic displacement of Hainan Island has been proposed, suggesting that the island underwent southeastward movement from an Eocene connection with Vietnam and Guangxi to its current location. This hypothesis has been adopted in some studies to explain the biotic origin of Hainan Island. In this study, we aim to critically evaluate the validity of this hypothesis based on available evidence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Hainan Island and its nearby areas.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Taxon</h3>\n \n <p>No specific taxon.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We reviewed the relevant literature and examined the geological, palaeomagnetic, and biological evidence for the proposed tectonic displacement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We found that the proposed drift scenario primarily stemmed from palaeomagnetic estimates and simplified geological schematic diagrams, neither of which provided robust evidence or a comprehensive explanation for such movement. Our evaluation incorporating geological, palaeomagnetic, and biological data reveals no definitive evidence for large-scale displacement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Given the complex biogeographic patterns of Hainan Island, we argue that discussions on its origin and evolution should adopt a more cautious attitude, avoiding reliance on assumed drift mechanisms without substantial supporting evidence.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15299,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biogeography","volume":"52 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Did Hainan Island (Southern China) Undergo Significant Cenozoic Tectonic Displacement, and Impact Its Biota's Sourcing and Evolution?\",\"authors\":\"Pei-Han Huang,&nbsp;Yi-Gang Song,&nbsp;Jie Li,&nbsp;Hong-Hu Meng\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jbi.15168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>A significant Cenozoic tectonic displacement of Hainan Island has been proposed, suggesting that the island underwent southeastward movement from an Eocene connection with Vietnam and Guangxi to its current location. This hypothesis has been adopted in some studies to explain the biotic origin of Hainan Island. In this study, we aim to critically evaluate the validity of this hypothesis based on available evidence.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Hainan Island and its nearby areas.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Taxon</h3>\\n \\n <p>No specific taxon.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We reviewed the relevant literature and examined the geological, palaeomagnetic, and biological evidence for the proposed tectonic displacement.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We found that the proposed drift scenario primarily stemmed from palaeomagnetic estimates and simplified geological schematic diagrams, neither of which provided robust evidence or a comprehensive explanation for such movement. Our evaluation incorporating geological, palaeomagnetic, and biological data reveals no definitive evidence for large-scale displacement.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Given the complex biogeographic patterns of Hainan Island, we argue that discussions on its origin and evolution should adopt a more cautious attitude, avoiding reliance on assumed drift mechanisms without substantial supporting evidence.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"52 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.15168\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.15168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的提出海南岛在始新世与越南、广西连接后,经历了一次明显的新生代构造位移,表明海南岛在今位置上经历了东南运动。这一假说在一些研究中被用来解释海南岛的生物起源。在本研究中,我们的目标是根据现有证据批判性地评估这一假设的有效性。海南岛及其周边地区。没有特定的分类群。方法回顾相关文献,从地质、古地磁和生物等方面对构造位移进行研究。结果提出的漂移假设主要来源于古地磁估算和简化的地质示意图,两者都不能提供强有力的证据或全面的解释。我们的评估结合了地质、古地磁和生物数据,没有发现大规模位移的明确证据。鉴于海南岛复杂的生物地理格局,我们认为在讨论其起源和演化问题时应采取更为谨慎的态度,避免在没有充分证据支持的情况下依赖于假设的漂移机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Did Hainan Island (Southern China) Undergo Significant Cenozoic Tectonic Displacement, and Impact Its Biota's Sourcing and Evolution?

Aim

A significant Cenozoic tectonic displacement of Hainan Island has been proposed, suggesting that the island underwent southeastward movement from an Eocene connection with Vietnam and Guangxi to its current location. This hypothesis has been adopted in some studies to explain the biotic origin of Hainan Island. In this study, we aim to critically evaluate the validity of this hypothesis based on available evidence.

Location

Hainan Island and its nearby areas.

Taxon

No specific taxon.

Methods

We reviewed the relevant literature and examined the geological, palaeomagnetic, and biological evidence for the proposed tectonic displacement.

Results

We found that the proposed drift scenario primarily stemmed from palaeomagnetic estimates and simplified geological schematic diagrams, neither of which provided robust evidence or a comprehensive explanation for such movement. Our evaluation incorporating geological, palaeomagnetic, and biological data reveals no definitive evidence for large-scale displacement.

Main Conclusions

Given the complex biogeographic patterns of Hainan Island, we argue that discussions on its origin and evolution should adopt a more cautious attitude, avoiding reliance on assumed drift mechanisms without substantial supporting evidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biogeography
Journal of Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.10%
发文量
203
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Papers dealing with all aspects of spatial, ecological and historical biogeography are considered for publication in Journal of Biogeography. The mission of the journal is to contribute to the growth and societal relevance of the discipline of biogeography through its role in the dissemination of biogeographical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信